Re: Should anti-traders be banned?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
stoi
Pleased they are happy with you.
tbh i dont know who the hell you were on BCG or why you got disabled, but maybe thats the point, i havnt missed you 1 iota.
so basically what you're saying is, other then the 20-30 friends/admins on BCG, you wouldn't notice if anybody disappeard (how could you? you're human as well) thus you wouldn't miss them, meaning, apart from that 20-30, the rest of your members are useless or at least not "valuable"? is that right?
Re: Should anti-traders be banned?
get those traders, they don't share the love
Re: Should anti-traders be banned?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
L3g3ndary
Quote:
Originally Posted by
stoi
Pleased they are happy with you.
tbh i dont know who the hell you were on BCG or why you got disabled, but maybe thats the point, i havnt missed you 1 iota.
so basically what you're saying is, other then the 20-30 friends/admins on BCG, you wouldn't notice if anybody disappeard (how could you? you're human as well) thus you wouldn't miss them, meaning, apart from that 20-30, the rest of your members are useless or at least not "valuable"? is that right?
you will be surprised how many people i will recognise, that is what taking part in the community entails.
Tell me what your name was, i very well may recognise it, but tbh trying to get me riled with your UG comment was just childish in the extreme. (i hear it all the time, we ban someone, "well UG is better", as if i give a fuck)
Re: Should anti-traders be banned?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
stoi
Quote:
Originally Posted by
L3g3ndary
so basically what you're saying is, other then the 20-30 friends/admins on BCG, you wouldn't notice if anybody disappeard (how could you? you're human as well) thus you wouldn't miss them, meaning, apart from that 20-30, the rest of your members are useless or at least not "valuable"? is that right?
you will be surprised how many people i will recognise, that is what taking part in the community entails.
Tell me what your name was, i very well may recognise it, but tbh trying to get me riled with your UG comment was just childish in the extreme. (i hear it all the time, we ban someone, "well UG is better", as if i give a fuck)
looks like you do give a fuck, else why are you still here, replying to me? btw I didn't wanted to offend you with my UG comment but it's the truth, this is how I feel
Re: Should anti-traders be banned?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
stoi
Tell me what your name was, i very well may recognise it, but tbh trying to get me riled with your UG comment was just childish in the extreme. (i hear it all the time, we ban someone, "well UG is better", as if i give a fuck)
Yet here you are in an anti-trader/trader thread?
Please stfu with your bullshit. You do care and this place pisses you off. What other reason do you have to be here other than to find out who's trading what?
But either way since you hate traders you have no reason to be in the trading section am I right or do you trade?
Re: Should anti-traders be banned?
So who the hell is classifed as a good member in a tracker?
The trackers primary purpose is for sharing a file not taking part in some arsed community shit .. There are better forums out there with much more activity than tracker forums ..
Since the primary purpose is to share files the members who do it diligently should be classified as good members ..
Re: Should anti-traders be banned?
If only people could appreciate the fact that some staffers still hang out in this place, despite all the shit that goes on in here, instead of treating them as a threat... it's obvious why the majority of them never post here any more, and that is a shame.
Re: Should anti-traders be banned?
well said kaffeine
the rest of you are just fucking scum and i have every right to go to the trade section to ban you sad bastards as you have to go in there to be sad bastards.
and NO i do not give a fuck about U-G, why should i, we are a different tracker to them, why should i give a shit.
Edit: I had just woke up so blew a fuse but my point still stands, if you can go in their to trade, then surely i can go in there to see you trading and ban you, if i want to.
Anti-traders and tracker staff are 2 different types of members imho, anti-traders are those that are not staff, but tell staff stuff, staff have every right to be in the trade section.
and regarding U-G and BG, not once since they opened, have i ever been to their URL, that is how much i care about them, as long as BCG is good and doing fine, i could not give a monkeys about any tracker.
Re: Should anti-traders be banned?
Back to Basics
If freedom is outlawed only Outlaws will have them :)
Re: Should anti-traders be banned?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
apextwin146
So who the hell is classifed as a good member in a tracker?
The trackers primary purpose is for sharing a file not taking part in some arsed community shit .. There are better forums out there with much more activity than tracker forums ..
Since the primary purpose is to share files the members who do it diligently should be classified as good members ..
Actually no, the people who made private trackers want more than just anonymous leechers/seeders, why on earth would they be a private community if they wanted that. The whole point of a private bit torrent tracker is a small (they have user limits) user group that are known. By known I mean that make a contribution to the tracker be it via uploading, irc and forum activity not just leeching the files.If the staff of the trackers just wanted a huge amount of leechers/seeders they could just set up the tracker as a public one, but no, they, the people that made the tracker in the first place made a private place to share privately.
Maybe you should ask the staff of the trackers that you so want to be a part of what they want and expect from a user. If you just want to leech files then usenet is beckoning and of course then there is no upload ratio required.
The whole point of the filesharing community and the bit torrent trackers in particular is to share, not just files but to share as a community.