E**** open for invites

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IdolEyes787

So what you are saying is no there's no appreciable difference.
I don't know why my dog keeps going on about how FLAC is so great then.:happy:

There's nothing wrong with the lounge .It's just like the bt section where the biggest assholes make the most noise.

---

For most people there is no difference, or they don't have the equipment to appreciate it. Never said FLAC was for everyone, I just proposed that as a method to see whether FLAC is for you :)

There are other reasons for its use as well (archiving, tons of spare disk space, burning 1:1 copies, etc).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IdolEyes787

So what you are saying is no there's no appreciable difference.
I don't know why my dog keeps going on about how FLAC is so great then.:happy:

---

So what you're saying is that E if full of dogs, is it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IdolEyes787

There's nothing wrong with the lounge .It's just like the bt section where the biggest assholes make the most noise.

---

I concur, the lounge isa bit David innit? :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ca_aok

Never said FLAC was for everyone, I just proposed that as a method to see whether FLAC is for you :)

There are other reasons for its use as well (archiving, tons of spare disk space, burning 1:1 copies, etc).

---

I never said that you never said that FLAC was for everyone.I doesn't bother me if people want to have the best thing available.
I'm just happen to be happy with MPEG and XviD.
Actually I'm just happy to be in relatively good health , food on the table and a roof over my head.:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ovisan

I concur, the lounge isa bit David innit? :lol:

---

Hopefully not that bad.:ohmy:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jeremyjoonsung

your an idiot. e**** is not prized for its content but its rarity. people don't go to e**** seeking to dl.

---

You really aren't that bright.

that's a very irrational statement. everybody has their own personal opinion and maybe i was misinformed about e****. i am at btmusic and love it there but still find myself using what.cd and waffles more for flac.

http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f133/p...ps-mp3-439212/
that's what you get when you ask audiophiles to put their egos aside and present honest opinions.
Some couldn't even tell the difference at as low as 192kbps.
So sometimes its good to just listen to the music and enjoy it instead of listening to it for the sake of finding some forensic redundant errors.

mp3 is for the deaf:P

I'm deaf. :(

and blind, that's why you dl only xvid movies and not HD; those are for sighted people:P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TP635

and blind, that's why you dl only xvid movies and not HD; those are for sighted people:P

---

and stupid right? ;)