Printable View
Which you are exactly doing now and when you were "following the conversation" before?:unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by ringhunter
Nah not really. I think I was confused by the mixed signals of you calling me trash, and continuing to argue infantile points that only trash would care about.Quote:
Originally Posted by AbyBeats
Make love, not war!
I decide to give out an invite and everyone provides me with free entertainment. Maybe I should give invites out more often...
if u wud have had pinched a smiley along with it wud have become more interestingQuote:
Originally Posted by Slickerey
that's very unlikely.Quote:
Originally Posted by whatcdfanif u wud have had pinched a smiley along with it wud have become more interestingQuote:
Originally Posted by Slickerey
bcoz i didnt got his mood is he angry or is he celebrating.........a smiley wud have helped
mind u iam not gay and it isnt a war its a debate..........Quote:
Originally Posted by senegal
seems like a war from my chair.
Are you actually this thick? I've quickly drafted up a rearrangement of who wins this thread's stupidity title:Quote:
Originally Posted by AbyBeats
1) AbyBeats - For exceptional stupidity in ignoring all forms of wit, insisting insults can win him an argument, being a great judge on all things trash or not, and failing to follow conversations in post/tree form. (The funny part is he will regret winning this argument because he thought the runners-up were both less intelligent than himself.)
2) whatcdfan - For truly pointing out what racists armed with visions of righteousness are capable of when given a keyboard.
3) Barclays - Even though at first it seemed like he was in the lead, he later proved he was unfit for the title for catching on to one instance of sarcasm. Pity, I had some money down on him. Cut the soccer references out, though, bro.
now u r showing some intelligence u think u can surround me in ur racism theory...........well good luckQuote:
Originally Posted by ringhunterAre you actually this thick? I've quickly drafted up a rearrangement of who wins this thread's stupidity title:Quote:
Originally Posted by AbyBeats
1) AbyBeats - For exceptional stupidity in ignoring all forms of wit, insisting insults can win him an argument, being a great judge on all things trash or not, and failing to follow conversations in post/tree form. (The funny part is he will regret winning this argument because he thought the runners-up were both less intelligent than himself.)
2) whatcdfan - For truly pointing out what racists armed with visions of righteousness are capable of when given a keyboard.
3) Barclays - Even though at first it seemed like he was in the lead, he later proved he was unfit for the title for catching on to one instance of sarcasm. Pity, I had some money down on him. Cut the soccer references out, though, bro.
neither do i challenge ur history and current events knowledge
and +1 for creativity in ur last post.......................
but whatever you shouldn't have said anything related to abybeats familia
k :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by ringhunterAre you actually this thick? I've quickly drafted up a rearrangement of who wins this thread's stupidity title:Quote:
Originally Posted by AbyBeats
1) AbyBeats - For exceptional stupidity in ignoring all forms of wit, insisting insults can win him an argument, being a great judge on all things trash or not, and failing to follow conversations in post/tree form. (The funny part is he will regret winning this argument because he thought the runners-up were both less intelligent than himself.)
and this is what ringhunter means by "following conversations"
and beware of ringhunter's high grade wits and also remember he doesn't insult anyone one.Quote:
Originally Posted by ringhunter