WEB DL downloads

I am not even an encoder. He is talking out of his ass as usual.

WEB-DL v. HDTV (MPEG-2)

Screens taken with Rec.709 selected

http://thumbnails44.imagebam.com/150...8150752075.jpg http://thumbnails28.imagebam.com/150...2150752117.jpg http://thumbnails54.imagebam.com/150...5150752160.jpg http://thumbnails47.imagebam.com/150...c150752185.jpg
http://thumbnails30.imagebam.com/150...0150752220.jpg http://thumbnails45.imagebam.com/150...2150752311.jpg http://thumbnails25.imagebam.com/150...5150752321.jpg http://thumbnails53.imagebam.com/150...c150752329.jpg
http://thumbnails33.imagebam.com/150...a150752336.jpg http://thumbnails24.imagebam.com/150...b150752345.jpg http://thumbnails41.imagebam.com/150...4150752353.jpg http://thumbnails47.imagebam.com/150...b150752363.jpg
http://thumbnails53.imagebam.com/150...4150752370.jpg http://thumbnails36.imagebam.com/150...3150752380.jpg http://thumbnails27.imagebam.com/150...0150752387.jpg http://thumbnails34.imagebam.com/150...1150752399.jpg

All the mpeg2 look bad, was there a point to that post or did you just give up on trying to make one?

The mpeg2 are far superior in those comparisons. You obviously don't know what you are talking about. The grain is completely gone... I mean if you like looking at wax figures on screen that is your preference but the web-dl has a huge loss in quality

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hotshot6473

The mpeg2 are far superior in those comparisons

---

If that was the point you were trying to make, you should probably pick a better sample set. Those MPEG2's look extremely noisy, are heavily saturated, and are missing details that can be seen on the web-dls. You can assume they have both lost detail since they are both encoded from source, it looks like the TV stream got the raw end of the deal in those. I mean, they're pretty gross. Is that Glee? Why couldn't you have at least picked a good show?

I didn't make the comparisons or like the show. The grain is there because the show is shot on film and that is what film is supposed to look like. The fact that the web-dl doesn't have the grain tells you that it doesn't look right. That is the assumption you are supposed to make not the other way around like the way you are thinking.

http://babesnboobs.hubpages.com/hub/...vies_Explained

:glag:

There are hundreds of posts about this on HDBits and on the http://www.blu-ray.com/ forums

Either educate yourself or just stop posting nonsense

Ohh nooo, don't stop. Please more examples

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hotshot6473

There are hundreds of posts about this on HDBits and on the http://www.blu-ray.com/ forums

Either educate yourself or just stop posting nonsense

---

And he was the affront to accuse me of not having a life.:mellow:

Btw before you protest I should remind you that you said that you also spent your time downloading TV shows and posting them on HD sites for presumably the express purpose of boosting your status in the bt world.:mellow:

Anyway enough of you , I spent an hour and a half looking at that fuzzy picture you posted and I have come to the conclusion that I agree with mjmacky and that show sucks. After that I wisely invested another hour and a half staring at two identical pieces of paper before deciding the one on the right was better to draw on.:)
Sad fact is that after all that work the picture turn out looking like Kurt from Glee. :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hotshot6473

There are hundreds of posts about this on HDBits and on the http://www.blu-ray.com/ forums

Either educate yourself or just stop posting nonsense

---

I'm going to go out on a limb and wager that no one has ever accused you of reading too much between the lines. You seem to be so unaware, I'd be surprised if you told me there was a chair under your ass.