Re: World trade center video
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
Proof?
Quote:
See the Insurance Claims case.
Proof?
Quote:
...the charges would need to be placed before 911.
Proof?
have you watched the video?
Re: World trade center video
Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
Proof?
Proof?
Quote:
...the charges would need to be placed before 911.
Proof?
have you watched the video?
Doubtful. If you watch the video then the terrorists win.
Re: World trade center video
Quote:
Originally Posted by Withcheese
My opinion is still out on this. But, unlike some of the lamers in this thread, I have watched this video.
I haven't got time to watch the video, but I gather it's something to do with claims that WTC7 was deliberately demolished, with explosive charges that were planted prior to 9/11...?
But does it explain...
WHY? :unsure:
Re: World trade center video
Quote:
have you watched the video?
Yes. I thought that would have evident by my previous posts.
The information I'm looking for is proof, not a conspiracy theorist yelling into a microphone on the street saying it to be so. Heck, I've seen the homeless doing that. ;)
Re: World trade center video
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barbarossa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Withcheese
My opinion is still out on this. But, unlike some of the lamers in this thread, I have watched this video.
I haven't got time to watch the video, but I gather it's something to do with claims that WTC7 was deliberately demolished, with explosive charges that were planted prior to 9/11...?
But does it explain...
WHY? :unsure:
I haven't watched the video either but that doesn't seem a pre-requisite in this thread.
I expect the charges were to ensure that the buildings fell in a regular fashion so as not to tumble into adjacent buildings, which would cause even more loss of life.
Re: World trade center video
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
Quote:
have you watched the video?
Yes. I thought that would have evident by my previous posts.
The information I'm looking for is
proof, not a conspiracy theorist yelling into a microphone on the street saying it to be so. Heck, I've seen the homeless doing that. ;)
That's not how the evidence was presented in the video though. Which suggests to me that you didn't watch it or that you are engaging in a similar tactic to that you deplore in that you are just shouting "Conspiracy Nuts!" at the top of your voice (perhaps into a microphone) as your only defence.
Heck, I've seen children doing that.
Re: World trade center video
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barbarossa
I haven't got time to watch the video, but I gather it's something to do with claims that WTC7 was deliberately demolished, with explosive charges that were planted prior to 9/11...?
But does it explain...
WHY? :unsure:
I haven't watched the video either but that doesn't seem a pre-requisite in this thread.
I expect the charges were to ensure that the buildings fell in a regular fashion so as not to tumble into adjacent buildings, which would cause even more loss of life.
Lamers.:ermm:
Re: World trade center video
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barbarossa
I haven't got time to watch the video, but I gather it's something to do with claims that WTC7 was deliberately demolished, with explosive charges that were planted prior to 9/11...?
But does it explain...
WHY? :unsure:
I haven't watched the video either but that doesn't seem a pre-requisite in this thread.
I expect the charges were to ensure that the buildings fell in a regular fashion so as not to tumble into adjacent buildings, which would cause even more loss of life.
one thing is, the building wouldn't have fallen. another is, like J2 said it would have taken quite some time to set it up to be demolished, so the charges must have been set before september 11th
Re: World trade center video
Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
I haven't watched the video either but that doesn't seem a pre-requisite in this thread.
I expect the charges were to ensure that the buildings fell in a regular fashion so as not to tumble into adjacent buildings, which would cause even more loss of life.
one thing is, the building wouldn't have fallen. another is, like J2 said it would have taken quite some time to set it up to be demolished, so the charges must have been set before september 11th
Quite. Altho' how can anyone be absolutely sure that they wouldn't have fallen.
Maybe lots of tall buildings also have charges in them to detonate if they look as if they're about to fall into other buildings :unsure:
Re: World trade center video
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
one thing is, the building wouldn't have fallen. another is, like J2 said it would have taken quite some time to set it up to be demolished, so the charges must have been set before september 11th
Quite. Altho' how can anyone be absolutely sure that they wouldn't have fallen.
Maybe lots of tall buildings also have charges in them to detonate if they look as if they're about to fall into other buildings :unsure:
maybe they do, if so why is no-one using this as a defense?
