it will drop in ratings :PQuote:
Originally Posted by relik
Printable View
it will drop in ratings :PQuote:
Originally Posted by relik
TL should stay where it is. Invites won't last for long - a short period of time was mentioned if i ain't wrong.
let's see what is that short period of time if it's longer then a week i suggest it should go down a level, for now leave it where it is.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylar666
TL is good at level 4....
TL should go down lvl3,since every PU have one invite lol
that means many many invites,vips have 2 so..everything is very clear why down:)
TL down to level 3
they opend invites and there tones of giveaways..
I agree with lvl 3 for TL .)
TL is good at level 4. Another level 4 trackers have invites :)
I think it should stay at lv 4 :)
Tl? Should wait on how many new members get invites and sign up until his rank goes down. My buddy has a acc there and could not invite anyone for a long time!BC opened signup's public a month ago, should they drop to whatever level tl is going to go to? I know from what i read that they both are cool, but this ranking stuff brings traders, it is taken serious though! Assuming a lot of members here have seen from inside all of em? Should know what is what.
:stupid:Quote:
Originally Posted by predateur
Em, 1 torrent, the others are with good pre-times. What about ScT. One torrent had 1 year pre-time :D
we have in general talked abouth new torrent on FTN pretime,yea i have seen also 2 year ago pretime on sct but that was old torrentQuote:
Originally Posted by Prio
ScT have far far better pre then FTN;)
Tl should go down.
ScT should go up
Ftn Pretime : 3.5/5
Ftn Content : 4/5
FTN content 4/5? Hey man, FTN has great things. Many torrents, great packs. About the pre, it should be at least 4 ;)
Agreed about the content ... it has great packs ! Should stay 5/5
nCore should go up. Very hard to get invites and they are closed now, are they?
Yeah UP!!!.....ahhh no cuz there are more than 59 000 users there ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Prio
Hey, thats stupid with the number of the members... If I create site with 100 members, it shoud be level 50, right :D
should go UP for sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by monsterevilYeah UP!!!.....ahhh no cuz there are more than 59 000 users there ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Prio
:stupid:
ncore is good where it is.
ftn's content should be 4.5/5
and pre times 3.5/5
that's what i think after digging in the site a bit.
i agree with u about content but about pre time i dont think thoughQuote:
Originally Posted by fusionz
How does a tracker go down in content?!Quote:
Originally Posted by MESSI_19i agree with u about content but about pre time i dont think thoughQuote:
Originally Posted by fusionz
lol They arent doing anything different then they used to, still has everything, it is just slower.:lol:
And to the person who claimed TL should go up...take a look at the invite section and tell me how rare it is :lol::lol::lol:
Torrent leech should go down to lvl 2 now, every power user got an invite...which means like what ...20k invites...
DISCLAIMER: I would rather the ranking system be done away with altogether, but lets face it, that wont happen anytime soon.
I'm thinking its high time the whole ratings thing got a remake. I'd rather see a tracker being sought after because of its QUALITY, rather than its quantity of users/invites.
To begin with, I'd like to see more than a 1-10 ranking when it comes to the quality of a tracker. There are too many 8-10s, some of the 8s & 9s being very low quality in my opinion. So while I'm not suggesting we push those trackers down in rating, I AM suggesting we push some others up.
I suppose I am suggesting a switch of the numbers. I'd rather a system where there are around 12 rankings, based on quality ratings, and in the brackets [] we put the RARITY.
This way, we can at least have decent discussions on why a tracker should go up in rank.
Dunno about you guys, but I'd rather talk about why a tracker is better quality than about how many users and invites it has.
THey could do that...but quality is all matter of perspective. Rarity is not.Quote:
Originally Posted by mamacita
i think iPLAY go up
invites system is close
when SCT gave out invites for power users and up it has downed 2 levels :P
and TL , for more power users , and vip (x2) and still in the same level ?
WTAW you joke lol
it's easy, uploaders changes, do less work and you get less content.Quote:
Originally Posted by fatcat69How does a tracker go down in content?!Quote:
Originally Posted by MESSI_19
lol They arent doing anything different then they used to, still has everything, it is just slower.:lol:
And to the person who claimed TL should go up...take a look at the invite section and tell me how rare it is :lol::lol::lol:
Torrent leech should go down to lvl 2 now, every power user got an invite...which means like what ...20k invites...
Ya but you still see the same content on FTN as all the other 0day trackers that people compare it to, they just have slower pretimes on certain things.Quote:
Originally Posted by fusionzit's easy, uploaders changes, do less work and you get less content.Quote:
Originally Posted by fatcat69
TL level 3 or level 2...EVERY PU got an invite...which comes out to more invites then members are nearly every other tracker :lol::lol:
why ? so you can trade it ?Quote:
Originally Posted by G1adiator
Ncore UP-no invite system right now and invite cost 500 points which is very hard to get.
RevTT UP-no invites right now and they kicked lots of memvers after sign up.
TL Stay-I cant tell why i just think it's more rare than other trackers in lvl 3.
This is just out of curiosity, how many members is too many members to up lvls in this, as that obviously has something to do with it. as i hear all the time, its got XXXXXXX members so cant go up.
is there an unwriten rule that.
LVL 4 and below is any,
LVL 5 is less than 30,000,
LVL 6 is less than 20,000,
LVL 7 is less than 15,000,
LVL 8 is less than 10,000,
LVL 9 and 10 is less than 5,000
above are just examples.
Just curiosity getting the better of me here more than anything else realy.
PiSEXY got 10,000 and its not deserve to be in level 8 .
i think 6 for PiSEXY, no invites.
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoi
well, the number of members on a site is certainly a criterion to consider when determining its level cause it does affect rarity, less members, less potential traders in it, however it's not the only aspect to check
Others are :
Invite system specifications
How many time since invite system is closed
How many time since open-signup is closed
The difficulty to trade an account (with mail, ip history monitored closely by staff, etc...)
The demand vs the offer
So it's basically a case to case thing, judging by its size only would certainly be misleading
I still haven't seen a tracker with 30000+ members in the higher levels, but a specific context could make it possible i guess, who knows!
yeah i realise the other criteria, was just wondering if there an underlying rule somewhere, as like you say, there isnt any in the top lvls with over 30,000 members.
IMO and we are realising this with BCG atm, staying closed and having no invites makes the tracker stagnant, peers are dropping through the floor as everyone has everything they need. (mind you new games have been few lately so that could be another cause of this). and we have just went under 50,000 members.
this is why i believe that opening up or even invites are a good thing, a it brings new members to bring new life to the tracker, obviously there is always a downside as you get cheaters etc as well in with those new members.
ah well, just rambling here lol cheers for the answer though :)
The Vault in this system shoould be level 10...
so it's not good system.
Soooo ScL and iTS both should go up to lv 6/7 very little amount of members and not many invites :)Quote:
Originally Posted by WTAWQuote:
Originally Posted by stoi
well, the number of members on a site is certainly a criterion to consider when determining its level cause it does affect rarity, less members, less potential traders in it, however it's not the only aspect to check
Others are :
Invite system specifications
How many time since invite system is closed
How many time since open-signup is closed
The difficulty to trade an account (with mail, ip history monitored closely by staff, etc...)
The demand vs the offer
So it's basically a case to case thing, judging by its size only would certainly be misleading
I still haven't seen a tracker with 30000+ members in the higher levels, but a specific context could make it possible i guess, who knows!
Ok for torrentleech:
Members: 149,564 with open invites
How is that rarer then
HDBITS: Registered users21,000 Which is maxed at 21k users and not taking anymore.
Or how is TL = to ScL or iTS when both those trackers have under 5k members and invites are pretty hard to get.
am i taking crazy pillz?!
lol
According to me ScL and AOM should swap places. The reason for this:
- ScL is much more sought than AOM
- People only seek AOM for the level and most of the times only want to trade it further and not for personal use.
- ScL is already closed for signups, invite rules have changed (you have to have more than 100GB uploaded + 30 weeks registered)
- People offer more for an ScL invite than for AOM
- ScL offers content which more people are interested in than AOM does (AOM is only useful to a minority group)
For these reasons I think ScL and AOM should swap places. If not swapm then ScL should go up 1 level, next to AOM.