MIT and the US of A.

..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

All scientists or just the ones you know?

---

Scientists are turning dirty water into potable water, and turds into ground beef. You're thinking of capitalists.

..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaS99JMxqNo

..

Dave lied when he said he wouldn't be posting here, ergo Dave is a liar. Q.E.D.

Glad we cleared that up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

:lol:

That used to be me chavis.

---

Has it ever occurred to you that the ONLY reason you are even remotely of interest around here has to do with the fact that you were ONCE connected with Squeams. Beyond that, you are yesterday's toenail clippings. Period. :dry:

..

..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

Dave lied when he said he wouldn't be posting here, ergo Dave is a liar. Q.E.D.

Glad we cleared that up.

---

Dave said there was no point posting here as you all made any post he made about your favourite friend, encouraging her to join in the abuse. Now it would appear she has finally got the message, Dave can come here and abuse you all as much as he likes.

Nice try though, fuckwit.

I guess you'll have more time on your hands to hang around here and be abused by me now that so many of your friends have been sent to jail.

---

None of my friends have been sent to jail, Dave. Your reading skills are deteriorating rapidly.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted By Deceptive Dave...

Take my case for example. You took a bloke who couldn't have gave any kind of fuck about Squeamous, and who only wanted her to stay completely away from him. You battered him around for month after month with your twisted fucked up delsional thoughts. She seeing the fun you were all having with screwing around with this bloke, joined in, and he finally gets reduced to actually doing to her what she has been doing to him, and starts insulting her back. Eventually hurting her becomes something really important to him, so much so that he actually starts thinking about how to do it properly... and I mean that seriously... so he leaves.

He is forced to leave because you twisted fucks made someone he was determined to leave behind, into someone he couldn't escape, someone who no matter how hard he tried he couldn't get to stop being insulted about, and insulted by. Until he finally reslised he was seriously starting to lose the plot. Then he leaves because it's the only way of leaving that woman behind, and of stopping himself being inexorably being driven to actually damaging her as he is constantly reminded she has damaged him.

At least that's why I've left.

Have a nice life wmanker

---

Maybe you're not a liar, Dave. Maybe you're just catastrophically confused out of all memory of past events.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

Has it ever occurred to you that the ONLY reason you are even remotely of interest around here has to do with the fact that you were ONCE connected with Squeams. Beyond that, you are yesterday's toenail clippings. Period. :dry:

---

Then you should add me to your ignore list, so I don't have to keep reading the absolute shite you post in response to my posts.

---

No chance. You are a canvas in which others get to wipe filth on.

I'm re-watching the Hobbits, so I'll throw this analogy in: You are A LOT like the character Golem- that is, if each of the interesting, full characters took turns urinating, and wiping their asses on him. That, and Golem is portrayed as 1/10 as obsessed, and 20 times more mentally stable than the real you.

..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

Oh! Good, so once I've abused chavis into running away and hiding again, I can have a go at you :)

---

Your post had nothing to do with Squeams, so I'm off. :yawn:

..

..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

Oh! Good, so once I've abused chavis into running away and hiding again, I can have a go at you :)

---

Your post had nothing to do with Squeams, so I'm off. :yawn:

---

Yeah, that'll happen, Dave.

As a matter of fact I'm typing this sealed in a spastic-proof bunker where the seeds of your poppycock find no purchase.

..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

Nope, past events, especially recent ones have been very important, they've changed me dramtically, so I tend to try and keep track of them. Although it is possible that my intentions and reasoning are sometimes not explained fully, but then why would I care if they are, after all I'm only explain things to people like you, and you're of no importance. To me or anyone else I suspect.

---

Jebus, Dave, you're one impressionable little shrinking violet, aren't you. All these people changing you from week to week, rearranging your philosophies, redefining your existence.

You're plasticine, Dave, and the rest of the world are malicious chisellers, sculpting you into the stupid cunt you are now. Did you ever have a personality of your own, Dave?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

Your post had nothing to do with Squeams, so I'm off. :yawn:

---

Yeah, that'll happen, Dave.

As a matter of fact I'm typing this sealed in a spastic-proof bunker where the seeds of your poppycock find no purchase.

---

That was just Dave raising his oblivious level.

..

..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

chavis,

Have a look at the video in my "Why" thread, it's a good video. A good tool to help you understand why you've behaved like a dick for decades, and to help you understand that you have to change into exactly the kind of person who has used, abused and fucked you over for years.

---

I don't think I will, Dave. I don't think anybody else will either. The last thing I ever want to do is understand you. I don't think anyone has ever used, abused, or for that matter, fucked me over. That kinda thing only happens in the heads of people like you, Dave.

It looks like 18 minutes of profit-garnering 'self-improvement'. Have you joined a cult, Dave?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

As a matter of fact I'm typing this sealed in a spastic-proof bunker where the seeds of your poppycock find no purchase.

---

:lol:

I actually barked out loud

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

A good tool to help you understand why you've behaved like a dick for decades, and to help you understand that you have to change into exactly the kind of person who has used, abused and fucked you over for years.

---

Weak people are affected by the world around them. Strong people shape it. If you're trying to imply that experience is meant to make you stronger, and that this is the culmination of your cognition, then I'm sorely disappointed.

..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Darth Rings

Job interview at MIT in 2 weeks.

For the Americunts in the crowd, do I need to practice my southern accent?

For the Canadians in the crowd, box me up some snow.

For the Brits in the crowd, continue talking about Squeams. :shifty:

---

What accent does that Sheldon chap on Big Bang have? I would have tried that one.


Edited due to date issues i.e. I didn't notice the first post date

..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

However for all my stupidity I have finally got the message.

---

If I thought for a moment you had actually got the message, I'd be changing my siggy about now.

..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

If I thought for a moment you had actually got the message, I'd be changing my siggy about now.

---

Oh! I can assure you I have got the message loud and clear, scum like you and your mates kept telling me it, many of her friends also kept telling me it, but it took her to finally get it through to me. I accept you might not like the message that you've all contributed to me getting, but there you are, it's too late to go pretending you're decent people to someone who has finally come to understand you're all scum, and who has realise I can and should behave as you do.

---

I just watched the first couple minutes of your "Why" video, and it occurred to me how you think you are somehow enlightened through your experiences, but none of the people mentioned would stand up on a stage and blather about being fucked over, victimized, etc.

If anything, Squeams has only served to reveal what a pathetic, lowly little man you have always been AND continue to be. Both in real life AND online.

..

Reject, in the near future a group of scientists will be at your door fully garbed in stained off-white lab coats and over-sized Nitrile gloves. They will be escorting 2 confused individuals, an Asian man and some girl. I ask that you let these people into your home to indulge in your perversions of scientific debauchery. Become one with the centipede. Later, perhaps, start a blog. Maybe then I could assign a modicum of merit to your "science is destroying the planet" howls*.

*by planet, Dave is talking about Dave. When Dave talks about how women behave, or what shape the planet is in, Dave is talking about how women treat him, and what state his body is in. To further illustrate, here is Dave's "planet".

Attachment 99519

:lol:

..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

given your history of the misuse of this measurement

---

I attended a seminar about predicting diabetic onset today. Their results were 79% metabolite increase for something they were testing +/- 58%. Their theory was that there might be two mechanistic onset due to this result. Reminded me of you and how silly you can be some times.

:yes:

..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Darth Rings

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

given your history of the misuse of this measurement

---

I attended a seminar about predicting diabetic onset today. Their results were 79% metabolite increase for something they were testing +/- 58%. Their theory was that there might be two mechanistic onset due to this result. Reminded me of you and how silly you can be some times.

:yes:

---

You must excuse Dave, he tends to believe that all scientists are Bond villains in the making. It might have happened after he crossed paths with Dr. No Dave Her Tumor Isn't Benign.

..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

No I just recognise that most of you are crap at doing science (you know use of ridiculous tolerance levels and the like to make it look like you've actually got some kind of conclusion, when in reality you haven't), and of course that your crapness has had a detrimental effect upon the planet. Like for example all them scientists who insisted scrapie couldn't jump the species barrier into bovine, and who caused millions of cows to be slaughtered, when their science was shown to have been completely wrong.

---

That's why peer review and experimental reproduction exist. Atypical scrapie is a special case. The research carried out on it couldn't have been faster due to its late discovery. You let me know when you can understand the detriments of a mechanism gone awry, instated over 250 million years of evolution, within 10 years.

As for why "tolerance levels" are so high, it's a problem inherent with how we calculate the world around us. It's not because science is bad. It's like saying "why isn't there a simple expression for elliptic operators?" Well, because Math is as much a language as English. You can't simply translate into the solution you need without going through the diligence.

But you know what, you're welcome to stop going to doctors period once you learn how much of what they do is random intuition based on "bad statistics". You're welcome to stop playing the stock markets, if you do so in the first place, based on how the same "bad statistics" are applied in portfolio management research. You're welcome to just sleep in a cardboard box down the street on accounts that the engineers who manufactured your building based their knowledge on stress handling, earthquake codes and circuit topology all based on the same "bad statistics."

Please.

I don't argue that most scientists aren't bad. I'm actually quite arrogant and believe that some countries just need to scrap their scientific funding all together (Scandinavian countries, and the Crownies being the worst offenders). But that doesn't mean that all science is broken. Some of the most important scientific discoveries in the past 100 years were reported as anomalies at first.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Darth Rings

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

No I just recognise that most of you are crap at doing science (you know use of ridiculous tolerance levels and the like to make it look like you've actually got some kind of conclusion, when in reality you haven't), and of course that your crapness has had a detrimental effect upon the planet. Like for example all them scientists who insisted scrapie couldn't jump the species barrier into bovine, and who caused millions of cows to be slaughtered, when their science was shown to have been completely wrong.

---

That's why peer review and experimental reproduction exist. Atypical scrapie is a special case. The research carried out on it couldn't have been faster due to its late discovery. You let me know when you can understand the detriments of a mechanism gone awry, instated over 250 million years of evolution, within 10 years.

As for why "tolerance levels" are so high, it's a problem inherent with how we calculate the world around us. It's not because science is bad. It's like saying "why isn't there a simple expression for elliptic operators?" Well, because Math is as much a language as English. You can't simply translate into the solution you need without going through the diligence.

But you know what, you're welcome to stop going to doctors period once you learn how much of what they do is random intuition based on "bad statistics". You're welcome to stop playing the stock markets, if you do so in the first place, based on how the same "bad statistics" are applied in portfolio management research. You're welcome to just sleep in a cardboard box down the street on accounts that the engineers who manufactured your building based their knowledge on stress handling, earthquake codes and circuit topology all based on the same "bad statistics."

Please.

I don't argue that most scientists aren't bad. I'm actually quite arrogant and believe that some countries just need to scrap their scientific funding all together (Scandinavian countries, and the Crownies being the worst offenders). But that doesn't mean that all science is broken. Some of the most important scientific discoveries in the past 100 years were reported as anomalies at first.

---

This is my last post as I have literally now been bored to death.........arrrhhhhh...uhhhhh.............
Thank God he didn't also sputter something in that Math language so at least I wasn't both killed and bx + ay = 1ed..........gasp.........