Illegal File-Sharing

As far as i know sharing isn't illegal and yes it is, well most of it..few examples:
u must not share illegal stuff, u can share pictures of your undies (but not without)
nobody knows for sure if this exsist:
If you are affiliated with any government, or ANTI-Piracy group or any other related group or were formally a worker of one you CANNOT (enter this web site), cannot access any of its files and you cannot view any of the (HTML files). All the objects on this site are PRIVATE property and are not meant for viewing or any other purposes other then bandwidth space. DO NOT ENTER whatsoever! If you enter this site you are not agreeing to these terms and you are violating code 431.322.12 of the Internet Privacy Act signed by Bill Clinton in 1995 and that means that you CANNOT threaten our ISP(s) or any person(s) or company storing these files, cannot prosecute any person(s) affiliated with this page which includes family, friends or individuals who run or enter this web site. By continuing to enter this site, you are expressly and impliedly agreeing to all terms as stated above.
Well u can modify this one by wish lol...haha
hmmm:
Bram Cohen(Torrent inventor) & Dan Glickman(chief executive officer of the Motion Picture Association of America(MPAA)) sure are a dream team.
I wonder what agreement is logical, when its about file sharing. But well its like with ganja. U can grow it but u can't sell it. U can share stuff but u can't share with anybody else than your wife and close friends. For me i got wifes all over the globe and i share only with friends and only legal stuff. ;P
http://www.p2pnet.net/story_images/7080.jpg
http://torrentfreak.com/images/mpaabram.jpg

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1...torrent1_f.jpg
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/pics15/glickmandan.jpg

It's like asking Smackheads if they would like heroin legalised.

Kinda no brainer tbh.

I don't think it should be legalized. The artest should have a larger slice of the pie.(Instead of record executives,producers,Public Relations,advertizing)

CDs are cheaper to produce than old time vinyl records. Internet downloads only cost bandwidth and server space.

i use to be a person who would download music. What made me different however was that i would search a broad catagory like techno and would download a bunch of songs from different artists. after i found an artist i liked i would go and buy their cd. so in the end they do not lose any money. the only thing that i wonder then is what id you download a cd that you use to own? is it still bad for you to do that since you did own the music? and also i just want to point out that last time i checked it is illegal to share music not to download it.

Why are you so concerned if the artsits looses money?
I am personally concerned witht the fact that the people that do the actual labor get scrap for pay. I have to work long hours just to barely get paid anything. Artists simply doing entertainment such as music, acting, singing, dancing, and so forth should not get paid. It is not actual work.

I download everything I can, and will continue even if I could afford to pay for anything.

Artist should be happy that their loving fan are able to listen to their music anywhere at anytime.. just like radio.. I don't see problem recording radio right?

If you can share last rolo you can do it over internet .
Most thestuff i download is to see wot it is like , if it anygood i'll buy it :)

Yes, of course. People who downloads songs of the internet will still buy it from the stores if it's good.

i voted no, because if it was legal then it'd be one less whiner we get to laugh at lol