Quote:
Why do your take offense at my notice of your proud claim of being "left" of any American political party?
That was not your statement. This is what you actually said -
Quote:
So you are left of everyone, huh? That's too bad.
I am not left of everyone, however I am left of most US parties. Sorry, but the US does not qualify as "everyone".
Quote:
It would seem you believe you alone enjoy the sunshine of true enlightenment
Where did I say that? I present things for debate and debate other people's posts.
Quote:
I have a different opinion.
Opinion appears to be all you have, unnsupported by facts.
Quote:
You, by virtue of your remarks, denigrate the U.S. and it's political system, then claim immunity from anyone who would question your motivation.
But you are the one who pointed out the Democrats took backhanders from Enron etc, not me. So you are quite happy to point the finger at US politics too.
However I am not against the US, I am against the elite in the US that harm both US citizens and the wider world. Now if you cannot distinguish between criticism of political process and racism/nationalism (which if I attacked the US as a people for no reason I would be guilty of) that is not my problem but yours. Bush is not America, neither was Clinton.
Also, what immunity? From random insults like the ones you post? Now quite sure I follow you there.
Quote:
I haven't made remark one about the political systems of any European country.
Feel free if you want, I look forward to hearing how erroneous your views are there too. However, this thread is about George Bush so it's hardly surprising that it's mostly about US politics is it?
Quote:
You, on the other hand, can't make enough about mine, or the U.S.
The thread is about US politics you goof :) As for your views, I can only comment on what you post. Stop posting baseless drivel and I will stop pointing that drivel out.
Quote:
You suffer the intolerance and tyranny of your extremism, and attempt to visit same on others who disagree with you, and you seem to have fixated on me.
What intolerance and tyranny? Care to provide examples? Or is this just one more baseless accusation from you, to add to the many. As for you, I have already said that I would attempt to expose the fallacies of anyone who posts as much baseless drivel as you (cf the guy defending Theresa). I can't help it if you post most of the crap here :P Stop thinking you are a special case, you are not.
Quote:
While I am flattered by your obsessive behavior, I would not anticipate a dinner invitation.
Ah, back to the juvenile insults - with a gay undertone too! Ok, maybe you are a special case. But only as in special ed maybe.
Quote:
BTW-Please attend to your ignorance as to correct use of the "QUOTE" function.
You have no excuse for this, as everyone here has the same one, and your pretension precludes your reliance on the sham of it "not working".
Hmm you mean like you do? Typing Quote, followed by the quote in question? Or by using the tags? Oh dear you must be pretty desperate if you are attempting to use a board bug to belittle people now. I use code quotes whenever the board lets me, as do you. That is shown by when you don't use tags and just type Quote.
Want me to post some examples?
QUOTE
My figure of 85% expenditure applies to U.S. entitlements.
QUOTE
Medical Care is the eternal political football; the libs (if they had their way) would nationalize it, effectively dulling the "cutting edge" of medical research (no competition=no profit opportunity=no money for research=no breakthroughs) and we'd have to also pay the exhorbitant costs of the attendent bureaucracy (bureaucratic costs approach 85% of revenue income in some cases)
QUOTE
As Clinton is doubtless (for you) a heroic figure, I shall refrain from a comprehensive recounting of this fact.
These are from this thread. Are you hoping no one would notice or something?
You sad little man heh. Every attempt at trying to be superior is shot down by your own inadequacies. First we had the laughs that were "estopped" and now quote tags.
Quote:
Can you give me one good reason why anyone should answer your questions when you refuse to answer their questions about your position on a topic 5 times?
Leftism, but I did answer him and provided links. He doesn't because he knows his first statement was fictitous and was hoping not to be pulled on it.
Quote:
As do yours, sir.
How do you like it?
As I just said, I provided answers and links supporting those answers. So your are incorrect saying neither side presents data or evidence. Just you mate, just you.
