Printable View
Oh, poor Kev....the "Woe is me, the poor beleaguered conservative" card hits the felt.Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Really, when was the last time you had to actively defend yourself against hostile blacks regarding your "complicity"?
Are there even any blacks at all in your neck o the woods?
That's an awfully klutzy-sounding name you've coined - file it alongside your own "right-wing conspiracy" and "right-wing media", all of which qualifies as fictional..anyway, name for me a conservative who is not "beleaguered" by you Alinskyites?Quote:
Originally Posted by clockerOh, poor Kev....the "Woe is me, the poor "beleaguered conservative" card hits the felt.Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Really, when was the last time you had to actively defend yourself against hostile blacks regarding your "complicity"?
Are there even any blacks at all in your neck o the woods?
As to your "are there any" query, the answer is yes.
If you don't think that Fox News qualifies as "right wing", you're delusional.
And if you don't think ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, et al, qualify as left-wing, you are delusional.Quote:
Originally Posted by clocker
Is there no un-biased news in America?
Ah, I see.Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4And if you don't think ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, et al, qualify as left-wing, you are delusional.Quote:
Originally Posted by clocker
You get to claim that ABC et al are left biased while simultaneously claiming that Fox is "fair and balanced".
How convenient for you.
And you get to claim precisely the opposite, no matter that you do so without any acclamation whatsoever...even more convenient.Quote:
Originally Posted by clockerAh, I see.Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
You get to claim that ABC et al are left biased while simultaneously claiming that Fox is "fair and balanced".
How convenient for you.
Congatulations you two, whens the Big Day?
In the meantime, why not get a room? :whistling
I'm pretty sure that I gave my opinions upon Inheritance Tax recently, but I honestly can't be bothered to look up the post..Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4Shit...these days it's considered racist if a honkie like me even denies complicity in the "slave question".Quote:
Originally Posted by Rat Faced
It's what is considered to be a "disqualifying" blow in the arena of ideas.
Anyhoo...
How do you propose to qualify the idle rich for your morally-justified (read government-sanctioned) fleecing?
How many tabloid appearances would be required, for instance?
Suffice to say I think that there should be a substantial amount that is "Tax Free" (Far more than the UK has as a threashold now), to support the family of the Deceased.
The rest should be very heavily taxed, with no loopholes. If they want to leave to avoid paying, let them.. but don't let them back in either (even to visit) until they've paid the Tax.
Generally;
The Rich often pay accountants and end up paying less than office cleaners, and then demand special consideration by local authorities for Policing etc. Frankly, the country would be better off without some of them.
I encourage Michael Caine etc to live in the USA where they can have their "Special" status and pay the Private Sector there for the stuff they want for free here.
I'm all for closing loopholes, etc., but how do you even presume to appropriate money that does not belong to any but he/she who possesses it?
No matter what you think of them personally, I mean?
If the law says you cannot thieve it away from them, you choose government auspices?
By the way, do you propose to mark the houses of the idle rich (I'm thinking Michael Caine, here) with some sort of bobby-not signage?
I mean, ffs - actually, hang on a sec.......
Would you be interested in swapping Mr. Caine for Ms. Streisand?
We'll throw in the Brolin fellow for free...
I don't think there's a media organisation in the world that can be said to be completely free of bias.Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4And you get to claim precisely the opposite, no matter that you do so without any acclamation whatsoever...even more convenient.Quote:
Originally Posted by clocker
Having said that, though, CNN is kind of internationally respected as being fairly accurate, which certainly is in clocker's favour. I've no real bearing on the others, and I don't much follow the political bits in your media, including CNN, 'cos it was all sort of stupid since there was so much taking of sides last I bothered.
Some people on the internets seem to think NBC are closest to center, though.
Didn't Fox like label that Mark Foley guy as a democrat? That was kind of really bad, if so.