sex offenders lists

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Not necessary. In that same link there was an instance of posting a list led to idiots beating down folks with the same surnames.

Still not a reason to not publish a list.

---

Innocent people getting beaten up doesn't worry you?

You do realise how damaging it could be to someone to be labelled a pedophile don't you? Even when they are later proven to not be one the shit will still stick if you ken what I mean.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GepperRankins

their theory is vote labour to stop yourself reaching middle class, then? :dry:

---

Duno, I never read it. Pages are too big and the writing is too small :unsure:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Richard Littlejohn (Sun Columnist and full time chubby beardy bloke) says that Guardian readers are middle class, soft soaping idiots who probably work in the civil service.

---

Well, I'm a student so the soap bit doesn't apply. But the rest is spot on (my mum works in teh civil service). :ermm:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Criminal records are public record.
Criminal records are public record.
Criminal records are public record.
Criminal records are public record.
Criminal records are public record.

---

Yes, but that's irrelevant.

Edit: And really, repeating something five times? That is so childish. :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420

Well, I'm a student so the soap bit doesn't apply. But the rest is spot on (my mum works in teh civil service). :ermm:

---

Shit, I meant to say that you've bucked the trend but it seems I didn't write that :huh:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420

Yes, but that's irrelevant.

Edit: And really, repeating something five times? That is so childish. :lol:

---

Oh well.....

Criminal records are public record.
Criminal records are public record.
Criminal records are public record.
Criminal records are public record.
Criminal records are public record.

So you think all criminal records should be sealed and court cases should be held in secret? :huh:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420

Well, I'm a student so the soap bit doesn't apply.

---

:sick:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Oh well.....

Criminal records are public record.
Criminal records are public record.
Criminal records are public record.
Criminal records are public record.
Criminal records are public record.

So you think all criminal records should be sealed and court cases should be held in secret? :huh:

---

No, because that would be very stupid. And it's completely irrelevant kiddo.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420

Innocent people getting beaten up doesn't worry you?

---

having a sexual predator move in next door to you wouldn't worry you,
if you had a young child? :blink:

you wouldn't want at least the chance to protect your child? :blink:

and I am not talking about assembling a mob to burn the alleged paedo's house down....
just the knowledge that there may be a risk, so you can take precautions

I find nothing wrong with that :blink:

I am quite sure that the vigilante population is a minority,
we're not talking about 99% of the people going bugshit and killing people
they'll be caught and delt with if they cross the line,
and if they happen to take a sick bastard off the face of the earth, so what?

[sarcasm]
oh wait, killing is wrong, I forgot, even if it is in defense of a child's innocense :dry:
[/sarcasm]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420

No, because that would be very stupid. And it's completely irrelevant kiddo.

---

Hmmm seems relevent to me.

You don't want folks spouting off about someone's criminal record yet you still want criminal records to be public.

Time to do some rethinkin' little boy.