What invites are worth (Improvements and suggestions Thread)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Invites_4_You

Please read what is bold.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Patriot foreve

[color="Blue"]hi

i am going to post the improvemnts applied to the what invites are worth here to see what do u think of it before applying it

as far as u can see,i have implented an overall ranking besides the rarity ranking that is currentky used ,the new overall ranking will be either

---

---

Does this make my comment useless or what are you implying?

HDBits should be a blue I think. HDBits specialises on HD content and they have a lot of HD content that is not available to obtain from other trackers. TL, RevoTT, iPLAY should be a red IMO - maybe CZone as well. These sites have their own packs that's not available anywhere else and some torrents that's not uploaded in other trackers.

i agree about TL iPLAY and CZONE
and sure HDBits and Swelaoders need to be in blue

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by crossfade

If this ranking is solely based on rarity, only U*** should be on 5 and FTN and SCT should be at the same level - so both 5 or both 4.5.
If content plays somewhat a role, FTN and SCT should be both on 5 and U*** should be on 4.5 or 4.
BitMeTV and Oink should be 3.5, perhaps Bitme as well.
From rarity point of view, I see no difference between levels 2 and 2.5 - they can all be obtained very easily. It is true some have better content and maybe that's why they're rated 2.5 but I'm not sure content plays a role here.

---

The new ranking now is based on two things

First:Rarity which is the same old mode with the levels thing

Second:content+speed+pre-times which u can find them between Brackets

Both Rankings now will help members decide what they want to use or what they actully needs

U*** for example is doesn't have anything special regarding content so it's 3 while it's rarity rank is a 5

Tl as another example is a 4.5 now for the speeds,content,pre-times while it's rarity rank is a 2 becauise it's offered for free

Hope u got the idea

Hdbits and sweloaders has got there blue nicks :D in the 2nd Beta improvement which will be posted in the next reply :)

The new improvements in the Beta 2 Release
=================================

The () has been replaced By []

The Trackers name has Got the Same Color now

The new colors are for example

for 0-day trackers

for dedicated trackers like oink for music,bitmetv,TT ,etc

for 0-day Trackers which have content which mayn't exist in alot of other trackers

And here is the new thread


What Invites Are Worth

Maintained by: Buggyme and Patriot foreve

This Scale Is To Rate Sites From 1 To 5

• 1 being the easiest to get an invite or account and 5 the hardest.
• This has nothing to do with the contents of the trackers.

To Contribute To This Post

• Post site name and number according to value you think site has.
• Choices are not definitive so anyone could drop an opinion.
• Make suggestions what trackers should be added.
• Not all trakers will be in this list.

Tracker Reviews NEW!

• Trackers listed in BOLD have reviews, just simply click on it to see the review.
• Reviews are for FST members only! Please DO NOT copy it or use it on another site.

THIS LIST SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TOO LITERALLY.
It's just to figure where each site stands (rarity-wise)
Do NOT ask the URL of the sites specified in this thread.


Level 1 •••••
These sites are open for sign ups. Any users looking to join any of those sites can simply go to the site and register.

Bitsoup[3.5], ILoveTorrents[3], docs.torrents.ro[3.5], Midnight Torrents[3] and countless others...


Level 2 •••••
Accounts at these sites are very easy to obtain. If you ask for an invite/account here in this board, chances are you will get one for free.

TL[4.5], FL[3], TauriTracker[3], Demonoid[3]*, ChronicTracker[3], TD[3], ST[3.5], Bitspyder[3.5], Learnbits[3.5], SCC[3.5], HorrorChannel[3.5], TVJunkies[3], UKNova[3.5], Elbitz[3.5], SITR[2.5], BitHDTV[3.5], PussyTorrents[4], DH[3], HT[2.5], Quorks[2], XboxSky[4], etc.


2.5: A-L[2.5], VIPMusic[4], Music-Vids[3], TTi[3.5], CO[3], ThePlace[3.5], TheVault[3.5], ExtremeBits(3), TB(3), PotUK[3], BTMusic[3], TVTorrents[4], TvT.ro[3], FinDVDR[2.5], RevTT[4],Sweloaders[3], SoftTorrents[3], ProAudioTorrents[3.5] etc.


Level 3 •••••
Accounts at these sites are harder to obtain due to various reasons. However, it is still fairly easy to get provided that you offer a site with the same value in return.

rSR[3], CZone[3.5], iPLAY[4], BitMe[4.5], BitMeTV(5), OiNK[4], Pisexy(3)*, TS-Tracker[3], x264[3], FileFight[3], HDBits[3], FileZone[3], KrayTracker[3], etc.


3.5: TT[3.5], PT[4], KG[3.5], Swebits[3.5], TorrentBits[3.5], RMVBusters[3.5] etc.


Level 4 •••••
Accounts at these sites are quite difficult to obtain. It may take you a while to get into these sites.

SweDVDR[4], FSC[3.5]*, WB[3.5], E***o[4], Revolt[1], NB[4]*, IT[4], Thor's Land[3]*, etc.

4.5: FTN(5)*, FB[4]*, RP(4)*, FTWR[3]*, etc.


Level 5 •••••
Getting an account at these sites are very difficult if not impossible. Consider yourselves lucky if you have an account at these trackers.

ScT[5]* and UK-T[3].

:yahoo:

Nice job. This is much better than before. A new format that integrates overall quality and invite scarcity. :)

The link to FL's detail page is corrupt: http://filesharingtalk.com/p-what-in...4/postcount380

revolt 1 yes it deserve it.
thanks for new rating system

Cool changes. =) It's very user-friendly.

Imo, IT, and Swebits shouldn't be as high rarity-wise as they currently are. I still stand by that BitmeTV should be .5 higher. Also, some of the [] are still (). ;) In addition, I don't think Elbitz should be 3.5 on quality. The last time I was there, they didn't have many torrents at all. For me, x264 should be 3.5 in quality, RTT should be 4.5 in quality, and Pisexy should be 3.5 in quality.