Exigo IRC support channel

I'm not a devoted p2p user, but I do appreciate value of such network and commitment of others, who are responsible for creating and maintaining its quality. As far as I know Exigo is one of the highest ranked music trackers with, more or less, integrated community, has uncommonly restricted application methods and every other technical element of site at "professional standards". How is that possible that person in management allows explanation based on a simple "memory thing" to be in a range of consideration? What I mean is irresponsible and even simple-minded guy with profound lack of any wits, should be capable of awareness that a wide group of people gives a gargantuan fuck.
Well, I hope that admin at least won't back in couple weeks with a smile at his face: "Hiya, mates!".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Stabber

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by n00bz0r

:lol:
He should have left the ownership to someone else who gave a fuck. I am quite sure one of the admins or mods would have gladly stepped up.

---

Here is the answer from someone over at pedro's

"I don't presume to be able to read anyone else's mind but I've often noticed that many people seem to prefer letting something of their own degrade or collapse altogether rather than handing it over to someone else who can and will keep it going strong. IMO, it's simply a Control Thing and/or an Ego Thing. I don't know if this is the case with their sysop or not (there are an infinite number of other possible reasons), only that it's not an uncommon thing to see in humanity in general."

---

I'd definitely agree with that. I was pretty blown away when WhatMan stepped down and handed everything over, never expected him to do that. Most people in a position like that would tell the other staff to run things while keeping the sysop / monarch chair for themselves but remaining relatively un-involved.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BobFromAccounting

I'd definitely agree with that. I was pretty blown away when WhatMan stepped down and handed everything over, never expected him to do that. Most people in a position like that would tell the other staff to run things while keeping the sysop / monarch chair for themselves but remaining relatively un-involved.

---

And for the umpteenth time I will say this: What is the follow-up act to Oink. Will people already understand the gravity of that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by observe

I'm not a devoted p2p user, but I do appreciate value of such network and commitment of others, who are responsible for creating and maintaining its quality. As far as I know Exigo is one of the highest ranked music trackers with, more or less, integrated community, has uncommonly restricted application methods and every other technical element of site at "professional standards". How is that possible that person in management allows explanation based on a simple "memory thing" to be in a range of consideration? What I mean is irresponsible and even simple-minded guy with profound lack of any wits, should be capable of awareness that a wide group of people gives a gargantuan fuck.
Well, I hope that admin at least won't back in couple weeks with a smile at his face: "Hiya, mates!".

---

The site is back online ;)

No announcement though :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Darth Cicero

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BobFromAccounting

I'd definitely agree with that. I was pretty blown away when WhatMan stepped down and handed everything over, never expected him to do that. Most people in a position like that would tell the other staff to run things while keeping the sysop / monarch chair for themselves but remaining relatively un-involved.

---

And for the umpteenth time I will say this: What is the follow-up act to Oink. Will people already understand the gravity of that?

---

I have no idea what you're implying nor do I bother reading every post on here or keeping track of your opinion.