Mental problems ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Biggles

Although the screen on my Skype isn't the greatest I can confirm that Squeams has a lovely bum.

---

Nice pins too. She was traipsing around the London underground in her knickers a while back.

---

I didn't think it was her. Was it her?
I only looked at the point in the vid you mentioned. It was like 15 minutes long :dabs:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

Nice pins too. She was traipsing around the London underground in her knickers a while back.

---

I didn't think it was her. Was it her?
I only looked at the point in the vid you mentioned. It was like 15 minutes long :dabs:

---

Mate, I pinpointed them pins to the max. It totally was her, like.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

I didn't think it was her. Was it her?
I only looked at the point in the vid you mentioned. It was like 15 minutes long :dabs:

---

Mate, I pinpointed them pins to the max. It totally was her, like.

---

I will take your word for it. They were decent legs but I was disappointed with the lack of camel toe.

Black kecks is cheating, imo.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chavis

Mate, I pinpointed them pins to the max. It totally was her, like.

---

I will take your word for it. They were decent legs but I was disappointed with the lack of camel toe.

Black kecks is cheating, imo.

---

I vaguely recall that clip - the girl in the pants made it worth a glance imho. The rest were all too hairy

I never did work out why they were all in their pants. Was it some sort protest at tube prices or something else?

Wasn't it the 99% thing?
It was political or something else.

I think.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

Wasn't it the 99% thing?
It was political or something else.

I think.

---

They never do that on question time...might liven it up a bit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Squeamous

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mjmacky

I hope none of this badgering of Keira Knightly's tits will make the female here squeamish. I'd still rape Keira.

---

Not at all. In fact, if I were inclined to worry about having perfect tits I would be more worried about the shape than the size. It's a fact that big ones tend to attract insalubrious sorts of men who drive around in dirty vans and have a coarse vernacular, but are likely to knock your back end into next week. Smaller ones tend to be the preserve of your more intellekshul man, who are likely to have a little more finesse in the sack. Either way, you can't really lose. You wouldn't really want one that hangs lower than the other, or is two sizes bigger, or sit around your waistline tho'.
I'm really not that bothered about any of that anyway, since I have decided that they are the ones I was born with and that's that. I'm quite glad they're a bit more Knightley than epic porn star though, because I'm athletically built and they'd be hard to cart around on long runs. And would look really stupid, obviously :ermm:

---

Have you seen the scene that I have seen? You know, from Dangerous Method... I'll screencap it later. Don't get me wrong, I hate big tits, I prefer them to be streamlined with the body. I just would still prefer something that can be put in my hand if I'm to go around collecting tits and the like.

We can get algebraic with this. I'd say B, and if not, than A is better than C. However, C beats 0. Sorry for leaving out the algebra. Algae bra... that's what a mermaid wears...

:pinch:

..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rejectOfAllah

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manker

I didn't think it was her. Was it her?

---

Yes it was.

---

Stalker.