What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eden297

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fatcat69

Where do you get that? I stated about 10 posts ago that AOM is level 6, due to how hard it is to get an invite. What are you smoking kid?


Just because it is not in high demand here at FST doesnt mean its not rare.

I havent seen a demand for F*** or u*-* in a while, so those arent rare anymore? seriously, look at your argument, atleast I have facts to back mine up.:happy:

If demand =rarity, then water is the rarest substance on earth...since everyone demands it.


Believe it or not, FST is not the entire torrent invite world :lol:

---

SO IF I CREAT NEW TRACKER WITH 80 TORRENTS AND 50 MEMBERS THAT NO ONE HAS INVITES, AND I WILL MAKE A REVIEW OF IT IN FST, WILL IT BE LEVEL 10?

---

YES :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fatcat69

Demand has nothing to do with level!

If that logic was true, then u*-* would be level 4 and Waffles would be level 10

To your rankings:

Nearly all your reasons are not viable in this discussion, they are personal opinions and not fact. Levels are based on how hard it is to get into the site.

FTN in no way is harder to get into then FSC. FTN still has invites out, and lots of them. FTN also has alot more members, therefore less rare.

ScT gave out invites to all power users at xmas. You state that it is more rare then iTS/ScL and other level 5's. iTS has only 10 users outside staff that have invites. 10 ScL only allows 50 of its users to ask for invites...ASK, it does not mean they will get one.

If you can show proof that there are less then 100 users with invites at ScT, id be happy to agree with you, however that is not the case. ScT has been offered for both of the above mentioned sites and turned down. ScT invite giveaways are far more common ever since the xmas invite granting to all power users.

You need to realize that content is in the [ ] while rarity is level.

---

Thor's land invite closed befor the creation of *its* but this new is more rare than thor's land because he since about 15days close invites , LOL
once WTAW told me thor's land cant go up because no demand on it, so if you know better than him, ask him to give you the job :P

to fatcat69: they do actually have a point. to get a true picture of rarity i'd say you have to see demand and supply of invites in relation to eachother. for example, diamonds wouldn't be rare if only one person in the world wants them, right? high demand + low supply = highest rarity. likewise very low demand + high supply = lowest rarity level. then you have all the combinations in between. do you get my point?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by danio

to fatcat69: they do actually have a point. to get a true picture of rarity i'd say you have to see demand and supply of invites in relation to eachother. for example, diamonds wouldn't be rare if only one person in the world wants them, right? high demand + low supply = highest rarity. likewise very low demand + high supply = lowest rarity level. then you have all the combinations in between. do you get my point?

---

I agree totally. Rarity is not only how much invites are given or how easily or how difficult the tracker is to obtain. The demand also counts. For example, AOM invites or accounts are hard to get, but the demand is also low, and then you also need to consider the amount of people who really want the tracker or want it for trade. I think the tracker worthy level should undergo some drastic changes. One needs to look namely how high the demand is, and demands for different trackers switch throughout time. Of course I also agree that some trackers are hard to obtain, even so hard, that people are not trying even anymore.

Rarity = not only rartiy but also demand in my opinion.

What changes would I suggest? I do not know, that takes me some time to figure out and read what posters request and want.

obviously, rarity take into consideration the number of users, the invite system, the difficulty to trade an account and the demand

to the person saying a 50 members tracker with 80 torrents and completly closed would be level 10, that's not how things work, i wouldn't even be listed which such content

for example, staff can apply to be community reps on FST but there is condition to match, the number of torrents and the date of creation of their trackers are part of it,

that's pretty much the same thing for trackers rankings...

Shouldn't the levels be composed of an amalgam of the quality of the trackers while the "rarity", which is subjective to say the least, should be put into brackets? Doing this emphasizes the importance of rarity which, in the torrent world, should mean absolutely nothing. When one organizes and structures this scene based on rarity, it draws unnecessary attention to trackers and promotes trading and cheating. Likewise, the ratings seem to be highly biased; how can there be so many "10" ranked trackers? There should be few 10's, if any and, instead of being biased, rated or justified on a scale that actually has a consistency to it. Just because everyone wants to be part of FTN doesn't mean it should be ranked so high; the content is par when compared to trackers like ScT and TL. There needs to be consistency for this whole thing not to be taken as a joke, while in my opinion, basis on rarity needs to be scrapped altogether.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by krunktastic

Shouldn't the levels be composed of an amalgam of the quality of the trackers while the "rarity", which is subjective to say the least, should be put into brackets? Doing this emphasizes the importance of rarity which, in the torrent world, should mean absolutely nothing. When one organizes and structures this scene based on rarity, it draws unnecessary attention to trackers and promotes trading and cheating. Likewise, the ratings seem to be highly biased; how can there be so many "10" ranked trackers? There should be few 10's, if any and, instead of being biased, rated or justified on a scale that actually has a consistency to it. Just because everyone wants to be part of FTN doesn't mean it should be ranked so high; the content is par when compared to trackers like ScT and TL. There needs to be consistency for this whole thing not to be taken as a joke, while in my opinion, basis on rarity needs to be scrapped altogether.

---

I totally agree on this one.. One should emphazise quality instead of using rarity as the main ranking.

heh, I posted the same thing a couple pages back

FB should not be a [7] seriously that site is horrible in content, I would give it a solid 4 or 5

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mister Moo

FB should not be a [7] seriously that site is horrible in content, I would give it a solid 4 or 5

---

that site is horrible in every way ,not just content. It is the most useless tracker i've ever had the bad luck of getting my hands on

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dragos

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mister Moo

FB should not be a [7] seriously that site is horrible in content, I would give it a solid 4 or 5

---

that site is horrible in every way ,not just content. It is the most useless tracker i've ever had the bad luck of getting my hands on

---

True! :lol:
I wonder why SCL is still level 5, side by side with ScT, PT and BitMeTV... It is a very recent tracker and signups were opens couple of months ago for gods sake. be sensible and put it in level 4.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 0Ri0N

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dragos

that site is horrible in every way ,not just content. It is the most useless tracker i've ever had the bad luck of getting my hands on

---

True! :lol:
I wonder why SCL is still level 5, side by side with ScT, PT and BitMeTV... It is a very recent tracker and signups were opens couple of months ago for gods sake. be sensible and put it in level 4.

---

the most reasone why is scl on lvl5 is because its much harder to get these unlike on ScT or other sites that are on same lvl5..

u can almost always see someone want to trade acc or invites for sct,also there are few GA for sct and bitmetv,but not for scl at all

lol yea they have had open signups *few months ago*(lol we could just wait couple of years then?) and if u call it very recent tracker than its not..they have been online over 4 months now and i dont call that recent( but that is not the point here)

;)

I think that scl will be the best

0ri0n are you sane ? it's almost impossible getting an invite to scl today.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fusionz

0ri0n are you sane ? it's almost impossible getting an invite to scl today.

---

I believe that, site is down so its really impossible! :naughty:
C´mon guys, we should be reasonable, a recent tracker (a tracker to be considered mature should have more that 1 year of existence. Remember SCN and RTS?) can not be in the same position of mature trackers like ScT and BitmeTV, even if the demand and difficulty to get an invite is the same.

0ri0n
1. bitmetv is a joke don't even mention it.
2. true, scl is young but you can't judge by that. it's already online for 4 months and shows great potential.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 0Ri0N

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fusionz

0ri0n are you sane ? it's almost impossible getting an invite to scl today.

---

I believe that, site is down so its really impossible! :naughty:
C´mon guys, we should be reasonable, a recent tracker (a tracker to be considered mature should have more that 1 year of existence. Remember SCN and RTS?) can not be in the same position of mature trackers like ScT and BitmeTV, even if the demand and difficulty to get an invite is the same.

---

no u are unreasonable or u dont understand some things here..

also (lol) u could said 5 years at least to be on net before he can be on list at all:dabs:

RTS?? u really know how to compare sites:cool:

I will go with ORiON..... u have to give trackers sometime before judging them....certaily not 5 years....but within 5 months u can't put SCL and ITS in the same league as SCT and Bitmetv....Trackers ranking on rarity isn't right for me .....This rarity thing doesn't takes time considerations whether the trackers is new or old .... and ..how good they are....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Akamajor

but within 5 months u can't put SCL and ITS in the same league as SCT and Bitmetv....

---

This topic is classifying sites from level 1 to 10 based on their rarity

• 1 being the easiest to get into a site and 10 the hardest.
• This has nothing to do with contents of the trackers.

also there is no rule or something to prevent (new) tracker to be in higher list

we are only playing by the (book) :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Akamajor

I will go with ORiON..... u have to give trackers sometime before judging them....certaily not 5 years....but within 5 months u can't put SCL and ITS in the same league as SCT and Bitmetv....Trackers ranking on rarity isn't right for me .....This rarity thing doesn't takes time considerations whether the trackers is new or old .... and ..how good they are....

---

5 months is enough time rating a tracker you can still see the demand and rarity is high. :naughty:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Akamajor

I will go with ORiON..... u have to give trackers sometime before judging them....certaily not 5 years....but within 5 months u can't put SCL and ITS in the same league as SCT and Bitmetv....Trackers ranking on rarity isn't right for me .....This rarity thing doesn't takes time considerations whether the trackers is new or old .... and ..how good they are....

---

we talk here about rarity
scl + its now very hard to get any one
so great work wtaw :)

Should be about Quality-Speed-priva-content of whatever rank( i do not have too many sites, mostly e learn):frusty:
S*t should go up, can not get a invite+= impossible? Plus demand is really the thing too.

i think today every tracker in the right level or the most fair one

WTAW http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../.....lies/laugh.gif I want to hear ur opinion about MV http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../.....lies/smile.gifi think it should go up as i know only few members have an invites and really small number of members
and it should be [10] the best site for MV and it has very good content

Here are my opinions about the other trackers:
ScL should go to lv 6/7 reason : U should be PU to REQUEST an invite and thats mean 100 gb upload and there are about 60 PU(It is like FTN but not 200gb upload but 100)
Traded accounts get disabled
So even 7lv wont be bad for it
iTS - invites closed and only about 1000 members there
AOM - Only the staff can invite people and only about 900 members
and finally i think iPLAY should go back to lv 5 :)
http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../.....ies/tongue.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monsterevil

Here are my opinions about the other trackers:
ScL should go to lv 6/7 reason : U should be PU to REQUEST an invite and thats mean 100 gb upload and there are about 60 PU(It is like FTN but not 200gb upload but 100)
Traded accounts get disabled
So even 7lv wont be bad for it

http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../.....ies/tongue.gif

---

you can even put it at level 10 if you think about it a bit more ...

This is what i think for now

iTS and ScL, should be lvl6

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wormtail

This is what i think for now

iTS and ScL, should be lvl6

---

no

they are still new

level 5 is enough for now... maybe they will be level 6 in some weeks..

and scl was open for signup for long time no?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dragos

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mister Moo

FB should not be a [7] seriously that site is horrible in content, I would give it a solid 4 or 5

---

that site is horrible in every way ,not just content. It is the most useless tracker i've ever had the bad luck of getting my hands on

---

ditto, my favorite is when you get the randomly generated banne "probably the best tracker in the world" , makes me laugh every time:lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eden297

no

they are still new

level 5 is enough for now... maybe they will be level 6 in some weeks..

and scl was open for signup for long time no?

---

yes i agree lvl 5 is fine for now..To others:lol people he was just moved from lvl 4 day before:ermm: u cant really think that site will go 2 lvl up in two day:lol:

but also i dont agree with u that these sites are new,they are not new anymore (u go and buy yourself some pc and after 4 or 5 months u cant say it still new)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dragos

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monsterevil

Here are my opinions about the other trackers:
ScL should go to lv 6/7 reason : U should be PU to REQUEST an invite and thats mean 100 gb upload and there are about 60 PU(It is like FTN but not 200gb upload but 100)
Traded accounts get disabled
So even 7lv wont be bad for it

http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/../.....ies/tongue.gif

---

you can even put it at level 10 if you think about it a bit more ...

---

If you think a bit more harder you could actually put it in level 11. :ermm:

pisexy doesnt worth any of the other level 6...

pisexy level 5

FTN will very soon go right up... no more invite for anyone.

Expect a ton of threads about this subject soon.

indeed FTN moved to level 9, invites being completly removed

NCore should go up,
i didn't see any giveaways when there were invites and now no invites at all.
any way 500 points it's extremly hard to get and that's the cost of invite when theya aren't banned.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WTAW

indeed FTN moved to level 9, invites being completly removed

---

Nice job ;)

PS : SweDVDR should stay level 8 ;)

ahhh many dreams of F*N will be shattered

I'm not sure why you moved ScL and iTS up one level, they just opened a few months ago.
I don't judge trackers by their level.. just wondering.

Lol , SweDvDr rarer than TT? Nah. TT has closed invites for long time now , and it is rare just like SweDvDr. TT should go up , and for lvl 7 maybe NB or BH. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WTAW

indeed FTN moved to level 9, invites being completly removed

---

if FTN is 9 then F***[7] - E****[8] should be on lvl 10;)

they are far more rare then FTN:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Forumas

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WTAW

indeed FTN moved to level 9, invites being completly removed

---

if FTN is 9 then F***[7] - E****[8] should be on lvl 10;)

they are far more rare then FTN:)

---

Yes, i agree with you.

If you change F***[7] you must change E****[8].