We are in bat first and so far we are 91-0 :01:
Come on boys, lets win this one
Printable View
We are in bat first and so far we are 91-0 :01:
Come on boys, lets win this one
191-3 :01:
And 2 dropped catches, come on
Bell! :frusty:
Muppet! :pinch:
50 for Vaughn :01:
Vaughn out for a little nick :(
We want The Simpsons. :angry:
Rain now - so it won't be long.Quote:
Originally Posted by lynx
I've always considered you to be of a similar temperament to Boycott. Fairly surprised you don't share his love of the sound of leather on willow.
stupid rainy country
btw that Bell sux give Collingwood a go if Flintoff peterson bad for 30 overs you will make 400 no worries
but looks like a draw becasue of the rain
poms back to their usual form early
When are you going to admit that England are currently a better cricketing side than Australia. We're head and shoulders above you lot right now, I just hope that the results will go on to reflect England's superiority.
Great bowling from McGrath and Warne apart this series, our batsmen have got themselves out.
471 - 9
Not a bad score, can't see Aus bettering it.
477 all out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanB
still 1 -1 and a drawn series is no good to you we will retain teh ashes
England dont have 2 good innings in them all aust need is a good 600 and england bowled out for 130 aust get the runs win last day easy :P
21-2
England > Spelling > Adster
My bad, 22-3
win the ashes series then we will talk about poms being best in the world at cricket
it is great for cricket though Aust finally getting some good opposition and got me watching it again
so used to the other team being out for 130 and Aust getting 500 and winning by a innings
Adster >fuck spelling
64-4
Your avaraging about 21 runs a batsman.
our batting is shit i think our players are coming to a end in there carrers all in their 30s apart from clarke
Aust cricket era dynasty is coming to a end
there finally facing good bowlers
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adster
So Glenn McGrath so quit Cricket because of his age?
no i don't mean that most of the players are getting old and will retire soon
as for Mcgrath look his 35 he cant bowl forever and hes starting to get some injuries now maybe his age is catching up to him??
Hayden IMO has been given far to many chances yes 3 years ago he was awsome but now he sux he cant handle good bowlers when he first came in he sucked average about 10 his first 10 tests couldn't play the west indies bowlers Ambrose Walsh
So should he give up when he becomes a certain age (say 36) or when he feels he's not good enough to make the team.Quote:
Originally Posted by Adster
depends few years ago he was thinking retiring for family reasons
maybe its his body?
maybe he wants to spend time with family
or he may not have it anymore (which isn't true hes still got it)
Australia made to follow for the first time since Karachi 1988.
The Ashes are coming home, oh yes.
Follow :unsure:
bad Idea england I wouldnt want to0 enforce the follow on meaning you have to chase runs against Aust it aint over yet
You Aussies really need better schooling, i can't make head from tail from anything you've said in the last 10 posts Adster, which might be why everyone ignores you :unsure:
you don't understand what following on means in cricket??
I just fell asleep during that first session of Aust
getting 48 runs in 2 hrs
Clarke out 5/270
I'm listening to it on the radio. :lol:
Anyone want to donate a tv aerial cord to a good cause?
what was I saying before about the poms not being able to play 2 innings???
eat that Australian schooling
FFS, how tense is this.
116 - 7
England need 13 to win.
8 to win, 3 wickets left.
Warne keeps talking to himself :huh:
Full toss from Lee
4 to Hoggard.
4 to go.
2 to win!!!!
Well played Hoggard, great over.
Yeeeeeessssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
Well done Engerland
England with teh win :01: