Its gonna be great becuase many people will come back and its 3 hours. :w00t: :w00t: :w00t:
Printable View
Its gonna be great becuase many people will come back and its 3 hours. :w00t: :w00t: :w00t:
Wrestling is fake. :dry:
Exactly. This is the Sports Club. WWE is a sitcom. This thread goes in Movies and TV. :dry:Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
Stop dry-snitching.Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
It can go in either, it will generate as much dry-snitching in both forums so what is the point of moving it? I've made a number of wrestling threads in this forum that haven't been moved. Should we also move my Fantasy League thread to Gameworld? Baseball threads to Cheating Fucksworld?
OT: I'm looking forward to this Raw, it has a PPV feel about it and it will be great to see SCSA back. Let's hope he's back for a while. Also with Mick Foley, HHH and Hulk Hogan (:dry: ) back it should be a good show. I'd like to see the Hulkster get his ass handed to him...not gonna happen though.
STFU dumbass. It's a joke. :dry:Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheese
WWE is considered a sport (even though it really isn't). Everyone knows that.
Besides that, having a thread moved and still working isn't dry-snitching. Getting someone banned is btw. :ermm:
Was the "dry" smilie the punchline? Which bit am I supposed to laugh at?:unsure:Quote:
STFU dumbass. It's a joke. :dry:
And yet people still insist on telling other people that it is fake. You'd think they were the only people on the planet who are privy to this snippet of information.Quote:
WWE is considered a sport (even though it really isn't). Everyone knows that.
Perhaps they can go and tell some adults that the Easter Bunny isn't real and not to expect and presents from Santa this Christmas. And what's this? The tooth fairy ain't real? Awww shucks, I just knocked out all ma teeths for nothin'.
Who is banned? I can't remember any bannings here for a while? (Not counting spammers and the like).Quote:
Besides that, having a thread moved and still working isn't dry-snitching. Getting someone banned is btw. :ermm:
No one said anyone is banned. RIFQuote:
Originally Posted by Cheese
Wow ever since I turned you on to the word dry-snitching, you love to use the word any chance you get. As far as banning, your right. I think the last non-spammer to get banned was dry-snitched on. It was for something not involving a thread a move though....you know...something that actually affected the member's ability to post altogether and not where a precious diamond encrusted thread was located. :ermm:
Nope, I'm pretty sure he wasn't banned if you're referring to Samurai. In fact I think I saw him post today. You seem to be getting your facts muddled.Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
So as you seem to think threads shouldn't be treated with too much seriousness you'll refrain from bumping your own threads or linking to them if someone makes a similar themed thread (and doesn't search through pages and pages first). Thanks for that.Quote:
where a precious diamond encrusted thread was located. :ermm:
Not something I've ever said, so pretty irrelevant to me.Quote:
...and yet people still insist Americans can't read subtitles...
Strange thing to write on an international forum.Quote:
It's a free country man.
No, though I am going to see a Raw house show with two autistic children in November...they know it's fake in case you're wondering. We won't be needing Skizo to break the news to them.Quote:
So this means you watch Raw with children?
And I've used "dry-snitching" in all of two threads (one of which ranks 10 on a Google search of said term...:blink: )
From WWE.com:
Quote:
They say you can’t go home again, but next week, RAW breaks the rules one more time as the flagship returns to the USA Network with a bang.
Two weeks ago, Mr. McMahon decided that John Cena would make his first defense of the WWE Championship on USA against none other than RAW General Manager Eric Bischoff. Last week, Kurt Angle put Cena through a table with an Angle Slam, and the final RAW on Spike TV went off the air with the GM holding the WWE Championship high. Was this a premonition, or will The Champ overcome the odds once again to retain his gold?
Prior to disrupting last week’s main event, Angle campaigned to Mr. McMahon for another title shot, claiming he earned it by defeating Cena at Unforgiven. Angle’s plea was interrupted by Shawn Michaels, and after a verbal sparring session, Mr. McMahon announced a blockbuster: HBK vs. Angle in a 30-Minute WWE Iron Man Match at Homecoming. Kurt made Michaels tap out at WrestleMania, with HBK evening the score at Vengeance; next week, the man who can score the most falls in 30 minutes will take the rubber match. Angle also put HBK through a table at the conclusion of last week’s RAW; will this give the Olympic Gold Medalist a leg up?
While RAW begins a new era on USA, one man will see the end of his RAW days at Homecoming. The rivalry between Edge and Matt Hardy will come to a head when they do battle in a Loser Leaves RAW Money in the Bank Ladder Match. Last week, Hardy sent Edge flying off a ladder, giving the fans a brief preview of next week. Will Edge be at 100 percent next week to eliminate Hardy once and for all, or will Matt claim a shot at the WWE Championship and put his nemesis out of a job?
SmackDown General Manager Theodore Long made an appearance on RAW, asking Eric Bischoff for some exposure at Homecoming. Mr. McMahon thought this was a great idea, and has given Long the opportunity to have a SmackDown match on the show. Be sure to tune into Friday Night SmackDown to see who will compete in this historic match.
Also, Women’s Champion Trish Stratus and Ashley will face Torrie Wilson, Candice, and Victoria in a three-on-two Bra and Panties Match. Candice made the challenge after Trish and Ashley stripped her to her bra and panties last week; which Divas will be brought down to their lingerie at Homecoming?
And finally, WWE Homecoming wouldn’t be complete without a dose of the men who helped get RAW off the ground. “Rowdy” Roddy Piper will host Mick Foley on Piper’s Pit. Also, WWE Homecoming will feature the return of “The Texas Rattlesnake” Stone Cold Steve Austin, Hulk Hogan and Triple H.
On top of all this, several legendary names from the past will also be appearing on RAW Monday night. Scheduled to appear are “Hacksaw” Jim Duggan, Jimmy Hart, Hillbilly Jim, Superstar Billy Graham, Fabulous Moolah, Mae Young, Harley Race, Jimmy “Superfly” Snuka, Chief Jay Strongbow, Greg “The Hammer” Valentine, Nikolai Volkoff and Koko B. Ware.
Either way, glad I could introduce you to the word seeing that at the time, it was fitting. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheese
Only in your interpretation, which given your remarkeable talent for being deliberately obtuse makes it a questionable observation. At best.Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
My guilt or lack of aside, Samurai isn't banned, that's pretty much a fact as he seems to be posting today.Quote:
So Samurai was never banned as a result of your dry-snitching?
Not in the same way as a ban does perhaps, but it is still a way of stifling other people's free speech. Given your high ideals on this "dry snitching" I would have thought you were above "back-seat moderating".Quote:
It still doesn't affect whether a member can post or not. :dry:
And I live in England (not Texas as my user details suggest), which still means your statement makes little sense here, especially when addressed to me directly. Unless you actually believe I am in Texas right now?Quote:
Yet I live in America.
No 'cause I said Texas is kinda free. RIFQuote:
Originally Posted by Cheese
I've seen you bump your own thread from months before if someone starts a new one on the same topic. Linking to your own thread (another of your favourites) only encourages someone to go and bump that as well. Seems to me, that you're the one who wants that "warmspecialfeelingofgettinganawardfortheirveryownthreadtocalltheirown".Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
Remind me which one of us makes up words and phrases when he can't express himself properly?:unsure:Quote:
...glad I could help expand the vocab mang
So, he's not banned. End of story.Quote:
Not anymore no.
Still doesn't explain your bizarre statement. Reading is fundamental but I think it helps if the writer makes an effort to avoid nonsense.Quote:
No 'cause I said Texas is kinda free. RIF
I don't rule. No fix necessary.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheese
If my life ever does one day depend on dechipering the rantings of internet nerds I still don't think that will change the fact that you didn't make sense initially.Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
One post I made. Would have slipped under the radar of the mods if someone (you) hadn't have kicked up such a fuss in that thread. So really, it was your fault that attention was drawn to the thread.Quote:
True. He's not banned anymore after you dry-snitched on him.
Not that I really think the mods listen to me quite that closely and your whole reasoning behind calling me a "dry snitch" is ignoring my single post's...what's that word? Context. If your life depended on it you'd understand...
Wow, going by my previous post's edit it takes you around quarter of an hour to type out a reply to the "linked-to-stupid" Cheese's posts. Either you have a 28k modem or you're just slow-witted. Either way...
.....it shows I can multi-task. I actually a have a job.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheese
(I'm on wireless broadband btw)
stop Quoting, it looks like several Peerzy at once :frusty:
btw where did wwe went that it wants come back, they said something about not airing the show in spike tv anymore.
I know it's been lost in the thread a bit but it looks like it'll be on USA.Quote:
Originally Posted by BawA
Busyman, the image in you're signature is too big.
Please change it or I'll report you to a moderator :dry:
Doesn't really detract from what I said in response. It's still a strange thing to say on an international forum. This isn't a country and it's not free.Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
Perhaps if you weren't such a hypocrit on the issue I wouldn't. But you are so I will.Quote:
A real concern comes in with a PM. Good lord why'd you have to bring dry-snitching into this.
It was just one post. Your over-reaction caused more problems as I recall, next time you should consider taking something to PM's. That way there will be less repurcussions for innocent members like Samurai.Quote:
It wasn't just one post.
Well, get back to work or I'm telling your boss on you.Quote:
.....it shows I can multi-task. I actually a have a job.
What does dry snitching mean.
:lol: :lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by dry snitch
Good one. Starting a dry-snitch account.
I bet you would. It wouldn't matter obviously. Internet usage is tracked. I'm already being told on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheese
A small example:Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
I once saw someone on here with a Columbo avatar even though it was against the rules.
Lying about what the rules are is dry snitching :blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
:lol: :lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
No mank. Think 'if there was a rule against having a Columbo avatar' and that was said in the presence of someone with said avatar.
:crazy:
Talk about going round the houses.
You could have made an example of an existing rule:
"Busyman has a 150kb .gif of a dancing butt-pirate in his sig - that's against the rules'
However, it still doesn't answer the question. Giving an example of dry-snitching isn't defining it.
So what is dry snitching.
I think that if I complained to the mods to get Bustyboy banned for his over-sized sig then that counts as dry-snitching. For some reason the mods all listen to me and do my bidding.Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
Damn, if I knew I had such powers I'd have abused them long ago. :balamm:
So why is it "dry" snitching, as opposed to just the standard type snitching.
it just is. :happy:Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
Agreed. I was trying to go round the houses.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
No that's just plain old snitching.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheese
To indirectly tell secrets or offenses to a person of authority or any person meant to be kept away from a secret or offense, sometimes inadvertently.Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
If the telling of secrets or offenses is purposeful, minute details are usually left out as not to appear to be directly telling.
It is indirectly snitching.
Oh that, I do that all the time.
Meh.
Prefixing something with 'dry' implies that the following word isn't diluted in any way - meaning a purer form of the suffix.
Therefore dry-snitching should be a more explicit version of snitching (which is generic and could mean an overt or an indirect snitch).
Dry-snitching should not be surreptitious in any way :snooty:
Excellent..you dry snitch, you.Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
Meh?Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Dry snitching, in itself, isn't clandestine due to the possibility of it being inadvertent.
It is 'dry' simply because of it being devoid of certain details or proper addressee. :snooty: It is the simplest, most effortless way to snitch.
Deary me, you are in a tizzy. Bawa makes more sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
This whole dry-snitching definition ... you just made it up, eh.
Of course not. :dry: You say that after you come back from a search party.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
How'd it go?
:shifty: