Rogers (ISP) Claims That It Is Th..
Yes, Rogers the one i thougt was the best in isp's is now throttleing bandwidth consumed by p2p , mainly BT. If you call them up , they will indeed admit to it. Well then, now there are 2 options for me. Get a new isp or making sumthing like Bittorent lol , anways yea .. they are throttleing BT bottom line.
Re: Rogers (ISP) Claims That It Is Th..
They suck i hope they go out of business soon.
Re: Rogers (ISP) Claims That It Is Th..
Re: Rogers (ISP) Claims That It Is Th..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linkin Park
Get telus.
Telus huh, will ask parents about that , and i will also check if they are in my area , please god please , its funny how i live like 10 sec walk to bell world and they dont have bell high speed in my area , the guy is like we dont have serive here sorry lol
Re: Rogers (ISP) Claims That It Is Th..
Quote:
Originally Posted by top25
They suck i hope they go out of business soon.
that's highly doubtful considering it's a multi-billion dollar company.
Re: Rogers (ISP) Claims That It Is Th..
Just use port 1720 and your problem will be solved.
Rogers uses port 1720 for their VoIP and they don't throttle it.
Re: Rogers (ISP) Claims That It Is Th..
how do u find out what port they used for hteir voip?
Re: Rogers (ISP) Claims That It Is Th..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crude
Just use port 1720 and your problem will be solved.
Rogers uses port 1720 for their VoIP and they don't throttle it.
agreed, i'm on port 1720 too and speeds are fine
now only problem is their stupid bandwidth cap, 100GB monthly
Quote:
Originally Posted by dark0anima
how do u find out what port they used for hteir voip?
i'm not sure where Crude found it, but on places like DSLreports or just searching in google will find many rogers complaints, and also ways to fix it =D (best way to fix it is to switch to another provider!:P)
Re: Rogers (ISP) Claims That It Is Th..
does this apply to SHAW as well ?
Re: Rogers (ISP) Claims That It Is Th..
Looks like they might be, at least in some areas (I saw Winnipeg and Vancouver on the list)
winnipeg: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,14712734
vancouver: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,12280534
and see the main shaw forum here: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/shaw
Re: Rogers (ISP) Claims That It Is Th..
i didnt know that about port 1720....will suggest it to a friend of mine. the list possible isp options keeps getting less and less in the toronto area at least.
Re: Rogers (ISP) Claims That It Is Th..
theres also port 1755. Rogers is getting worser day by day
Re: Rogers (ISP) Claims That It Is Th..
For Window users, can also try BitComet and turn on "Encyrpt Protocol Header". Supposed to stop the throttling.
Read it today on a couple of other forums discussing the same thing.
Yes I know BitComet sucks.
Re: Rogers (ISP) Claims That It Is Th..
I don't think it will matter which port you use.
ISPs have also worked out the port number dodge (they may be stupid but they aren't ignorant), so they don't throttle throughput based on port number. First of all they don't even start checking until your data rate exceeds a particular threshold on one port over a particular period of time. Then they monitor the data types on that port and build a profile. If it matches the p2p profile it gets throttled.
True voip is unlikely to meet the threshold so it doesn't usually get checked, and even if it does (for those who simply don't know when to shut up) the data profile won't match p2p so it won't get blocked.
Re: Rogers (ISP) Claims That It Is Th..
Quote:
Originally Posted by LikesWine
Yes I know BitComet sucks.
and is also banned by many trackers....
Re: Rogers (ISP) Claims That It Is Th..
As a long time Rogers customer I can truly state that they do SUCK 100% :)
Re: Rogers (ISP) Claims That It Is Th..
Quote:
Originally Posted by accat13
As a long time Rogers customer I can truly state that they do SUCK 100% :)
lol.
As a short time Rogers customer I can truly state that they do SUCK 100% :)