http://www.sendbackliberty.us/
amazing satire? ;)
Printable View
http://www.sendbackliberty.us/
amazing satire? ;)
Zis site is tres humorous, non? :D
Ya know, I was with 'em all the way to the part about Ronald Reagan.
Then for some reason I couldn't stop gagging...
P.S.- I wonder if they would mind if I edited their site for grammar. Or maybe proper grammar is a French thing...
Reagan was good for what ailed the U.S. at the time-A great counter-Carter, if you will.Quote:
Originally posted by clocker@28 April 2003 - 11:46
Ya know, I was with 'em all the way to the part about Ronald Reagan.
Then for some reason I couldn't stop gagging...
P.S.- I wonder if they would mind if I edited their site for grammar. Or maybe proper grammar is a French thing...
The grammar could use some work.
As re: the French: Ze grammair iz pairfect!!!
Why should we stop with the Statue of Liberty?
I say we send back that cesspool New Orleans, too!
My personal term of affection for the French is "Poodle smugglers".
As a young man of 16, I spent some time in Cannes. I wore the typical modest American swimwear to the beach. For the first couple days I couldn't get over the fact that the women were topless. After a while I acclimated and started to notice other things.
I can tolerate differences in modesty among cultures, but if your going to wear an itty bitty swimsuit, tidy up the yard a little.
It looked like these poor little swimsuits were just about to burst, stuffed to the brim with unbridled kinky pubic hair.
I determined that these people were involved in some sort of lucrative underworld poodle smuggling racket, transporting poodles up and down the beach in their swimsuits until they could make the drop and score some big cash.
what's all this about grammar? can't you find something constructive to
say? I agree the americans should send the Statue Of Liberty back.
We Brits can send the Blackpool Tower, which is a smaller replica of tha
StatueOf Liberty, the French gave to us in the distant past (don't know
when), (don't know why).
Is my grammer ok, if not go eat a frogs leg billyfridge. :P
sorry, billyfridge again, made a right cock up there didn't I, our Blackpool
Tower is a replica of the Eiffel Tower, not theStatue Of Liberty. oooops.
Ooooo...
*edit for spelling & grammar
good idea, we don't need it :P
one less terrorist target. by giving the statue back to the french, we're winning the war on terror! :P
Before it sinks and cannot be retrieved! :lol:Quote:
Originally posted by clocker@28 April 2003 - 12:03
Why should we stop with the Statue of Liberty?
I say we send back that cesspool New Orleans, too!
This goes in the file :lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally posted by hobbes@28 April 2003 - 12:34
My personal term of affection for the French is "Poodle smugglers".
You mean a replica of the Eiffel Tower surely.......Otherwise its a bit of an abstract rendition. :blink:Quote:
We Brits can send the Blackpool Tower, which is a smaller replica of tha
StatueOf Liberty
Goes along with his somewhat abstract logic, really.Quote:
Originally posted by Rat Faced@29 April 2003 - 01:41
You mean a replica of the Eiffel Tower surely.......Otherwise its a bit of an abstract rendition. :blink:
thats the flag of orleon;s is'nt it?
and actually, back me up here rat faced, there would not be a USA today if it was not for french interference in a family squabble between england and english colonial settlers in the american colonies, truth is less than 5% bothered about indepedence.
Don't they teach US history in the US?Quote:
and actually, back me up here rat faced, there would not be a USA today if it was not for french interference in a family squabble between england and english colonial settlers in the american colonies, truth is less than 5% bothered about indepedence
Yes, but I think it goes something like this:Quote:
Originally posted by chloe_cc2002@30 April 2003 - 22:31
Don't they teach US history in the US?Quote:
and actually, back me up here rat faced, there would not be a USA today if it was not for french interference in a family squabble between england and english colonial settlers in the american colonies, truth is less than 5% bothered about indepedence
Chapter 1: And So God Created America, And Saw That It Was Good...... :unsure:
:rolleyes:
LOLQuote:
Chapter 1: And So God Created America, And Saw That It Was Good......
The French were interfering but were at with war with the British. The war of independence tied down a lot of resources to the British. At a very low cost the French caused the British a whole lot of trouble and that helped the war with the British.
Every ship that was in the Americas fighting against the Americans wasn't available to use against Nelson in Europe.
The British and French fleets were evenly matched in numbers. The British warships were spread very thin, and transports were especially important because from a strategic point of view the greater number of transports they had the larger the garrison the French had to put in each port city, because the size of their invasion force was limited by the number of transports they hard. For the British having those tied up in the Americas was quite an impediment.
If you remember the move Lloyds of London the British merchants were screaming out for escorts for their merchant ships and trying to maintain the blockade which was thinning and crumbling on them. The British won in the end, but the French helping the Americans a bit paid off massively really.
anyway........
http://www.imahosting.com/sigs/nutto.jpg
Actually, the bent toward revisionism has left intact only those "facts" acknowledging human (read: neither male nor female; presumably at least some androgynous 'beings') involvement in the creation of America; God was legally estopped from reviewing/approving the result. He has been banished from books and public discourse, and is currently being hunted so as to be tried for 'war crimes'. :(Quote:
Originally posted by barbarossa@1 May 2003 - 05:01
Chapter 1: And So God Created America, And Saw That It Was Good...... :unsure:
:rolleyes:
Rumor has it France is contracting with an American textbook publisher for the right to legally supplant Britain as America's progenitor.
See what happens when you piss God off?Quote:
Originally posted by j2k4@1 May 2003 - 08:41
God was legally estopped from reviewing/approving the result. He has been banished from books and public discourse, and is currently being hunted so as to be tried for 'war crimes'. :(
He hath smote your avatar.
Now before anyone accuses me of being on drugs and/or alcohol or being otherwise impaired without the influence of any intoxicating substance, I know I am in the 'Statue of Liberty' forum.
However, I am very confused by the fact that it says last post 'Chloe' as when I inspect the said thread there are two others that have posted after I did.
Is this a strange and unusual phenomenon??
I told you God was pissed.Quote:
Originally posted by chloe_cc2002@1 May 2003 - 14:42
Is this a strange and unusual phenomenon??
See what happens when you piss God off?Quote:
Originally posted by clocker+1 May 2003 - 13:39--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (clocker @ 1 May 2003 - 13:39)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--j2k4@1 May 2003 - 08:41
God was legally estopped from reviewing/approving the result. He has been banished from books and public discourse, and is currently being hunted so as to be tried for 'war crimes'. :(
He hath smote your avatar. [/b][/quote]
Yes-
He keeps taking it away and giving it back; I don't know what I've done (or undone).
Methinks, if this continues, I shall have to consult with [B][O][T], as he is well-acquainted with all things avatarian and is also presumably on good terms with God. :)
J2...
"Eloquent pissing" is a talent I'm not acquainted with.
Would you consider posting any tips on how best to develop this skill?
Perhaps a instructional video ( with appropriate pixellation, of course). :huh:
As for development of the skill, you, sir, already possess the ability, and I am glad to confirm this. ;)Quote:
Originally posted by clocker@2 May 2003 - 09:58
J2...
"Eloquent pissing" is a talent I'm not acquainted with.
Would you consider posting any tips on how best to develop this skill?
Perhaps a instructional video ( with appropriate pixellation, of course). :huh:
If you covet MY style (to the extent I exhibit any), tough-you can't have it. B)
Any instructional videos forthcoming will be appropriately 'pissellated' (remember: terminology is terrribly important).
All in all, there is admirable eloquence all over this forum for the discerning ear :D :D
My,j2, but you have become enamored of emoticons...*
*note lack of expected smiley here
My style(!) continues it's metamorphosis! (no emoticon)Quote:
Originally posted by clocker@2 May 2003 - 13:52
My,j2, but you have become enamored of emoticons...*
*note lack of expected smiley here
Somewhat like Jeff Goldblum in The Fly.Quote:
Originally posted by j2k4@2 May 2003 - 17:21
My style(!) continues it's metamorphosis! (no emoticon)
Somewhat like Jeff Goldblum in The Fly. [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by clocker+2 May 2003 - 19:21--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (clocker @ 2 May 2003 - 19:21)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--j2k4@2 May 2003 - 17:21
My style(!) continues it's metamorphosis! (no emoticon)
Yes, exactly (somewhat). :huh:
There are no fly politicians.
You are correct again, hobbes.Quote:
Originally posted by hobbes@2 May 2003 - 20:35
There are no fly politicians.
Flies are by nature anarchists.
Which is a good thing.
Can you imagine the bloodsucking if they were Republicans?
You are correct again, hobbes.Quote:
Originally posted by clocker+3 May 2003 - 04:05--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (clocker @ 3 May 2003 - 04:05)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--hobbes@2 May 2003 - 20:35
There are no fly politicians.
Flies are by nature anarchists.
Which is a good thing.
Can you imagine the bloodsucking if they were Republicans?[/b][/quote]
Yeah, only the wealthy would get to suck blood, then declare this as a tax deduction.
Seriously, I hope you and you intelligent friends in Colorado can get some love from el presidente.
Yours,
Hobbes
Yeah, only the wealthy would get to suck blood, then declare this as a tax deduction.Quote:
Originally posted by hobbes+2 May 2003 - 22:12--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (hobbes @ 2 May 2003 - 22:12)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Quote:
Originally posted by -clocker@3 May 2003 - 04:05
<!--QuoteBegin--hobbes
Quote:
@2 May 2003 - 20:35
There are no fly politicians.
You are correct again, hobbes.
Flies are by nature anarchists.
Which is a good thing.
Can you imagine the bloodsucking if they were Republicans?
Seriously, I hope you and you intelligent friends in Colorado can get some love from el presidente.
Yours,
Hobbes [/b][/quote]
"Fly" politicians?
My friends, I give you J.C. Watts!
Seriously, I don't appreciate being termed a 'fly'-now, leave me, so that I might enjoy this bit of leftover burger. :P
Now who's Renfield?Quote:
Originally posted by j2k4@3 May 2003 - 03:20
Seriously, I don't appreciate being termed a 'fly'-now, leave me, so that I might enjoy this bit of leftover burger. :P
Now who's Renfield? [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by clocker+3 May 2003 - 14:22--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (clocker @ 3 May 2003 - 14:22)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--j2k4@3 May 2003 - 03:20
Seriously, I don't appreciate being termed a 'fly'-now, leave me, so that I might enjoy this bit of leftover burger. :P
Why me, of course! :D