have ScT.org ( clean 2 weeks old acc ) need U******** account + mail ONLY
Printable View
have ScT.org ( clean 2 weeks old acc ) need U******** account + mail ONLY
http://sct.org/
that's exactly what i need :D
:lol::lol::lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tk2011
Seriously....no trades just registered a month ago seems kinda suspicious to me!!! I got my eyes on you......:lol: :lol: :lol:
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
that is a good one
well i have to start from sth, i do have it, can provide proofs, will go first with trusted one)))
ohh c'mon hes new here
maybe he just got cracked in u know)))
You Must Be A Member 30 Days AND Have 20 Posts To Use The BT Invites Section
The rules to post in the invites forum have changed? That guy only have 15 posts.
I see a lot of not having 20 post in bittorrent invite section.
But i wait. :(
well,
so why is he allowed to post in here? server error?
in my case i wasny able to post here until reaching 5 posts + month
I don't understand why people here think that "new" members can't have memberships on the top sites. Not everyone starts here. Have you ever thought that some people just join here after already being on several torrent trackers?
thxx for understanding mate
Must be server error or the rules not being implemented, i think the 20 post rule have a long time now, so, i don't know.Quote:
Originally Posted by walczanin
I think the people who only have 5 posts got promoted when the new rule (minimum 20 posts) wasn't implemented yet and FST staff didn't want to demote anyone... unless I'm wrong again
They just didn't demote the people that joined before they changed the rule.
i have uk-t
i want sct+ftn+fsc+revoltt+czone :p :p :p
lol
dont u wanna north star as well?))))))
It was 10 posts for when I joined a month ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by NaToLaMust be server error or the rules not being implemented, i think the 20 post rule have a long time now, so, i don't know.Quote:
Originally Posted by walczanin
Funny, I thought it was always 5 posts.:huh:Quote:
Originally Posted by NaToLa
I can understand perfectly the situation don't get me wrong. But you have to see it from our perspective that he is new and he has not traded. Why not trade other things and gain some trust first then trade other sites. Yes you are right that people can be new and have access to top sites. I never said this was wrong all i said was that new members seem more suspicous when it comes to trading. You really don't expect me to take blame for slight suspicion....after all it is human nature.;) :lol: :lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by jelll
heheh
kinda true)))
Yeah i know but i truly mean't no harm.:DQuote:
Originally Posted by walczanin
I understand where you are coming from but my comment is partially also based on the growing trend that I'm seeing here that people automatically doubt the poster if they offer something worthwhile.Quote:
Originally Posted by gamer4evaI can understand perfectly the situation don't get me wrong. But you have to see it from our perspective that he is new and he has not traded. Why not trade other things and gain some trust first then trade other sites. Yes you are right that people can be new and have access to top sites. I never said this was wrong all i said was that new members seem more suspicous when it comes to trading. You really don't expect me to take blame for slight suspicion....after all it is human nature.;) :lol: :lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by jelll
they are automatically doubted IF they offer something worthwhile AND they're new. But if a reputable member offer the same worthwile account/invite, i doubt suspicions would arise.Quote:
Originally Posted by jelll
Why to all first have to trust someone before trade ? ... Use a middle men :)
I'll be the middle men in this trade lol :P :P :P :lol:
the guy offered to go 1st if the other person is a trusted trader here
cant get any fairer than that
trade done