<_< This may be a silly question but does anyone share music iso's for people who want a perfect copy of the cd and if so does anyone know where to get them from i know its a silly question :blink:
Printable View
<_< This may be a silly question but does anyone share music iso's for people who want a perfect copy of the cd and if so does anyone know where to get them from i know its a silly question :blink:
Damn! I wish I had your ears! Man you must be super human if you can tell the difference between 128kbps mps and CD adio! :lol: :lol: :lol: Why the hell not just download 45 megs of mp3 and get the full album? Or if you want a perfect copy of a album BUY IT! Like I said, mr superhuman man, how can you tell the difference?
P.S. Can you hear my sarcasm? :lol:
Well GimpyDoodlyDoo,Quote:
Originally posted by GimpyDoodlyDoo@21 June 2003 - 05:46
Damn! I wish I had your ears! Man you must be super human if you can tell the difference between 128kbps mps and CD adio! :lol: :lol: :lol: Why the hell not just download 45 megs of mp3 and get the full album? Or if you want a perfect copy of a album BUY IT! Like I said, mr superhuman man, how can you tell the difference?
if you talk about 128 I can tell the difference for sure, above all in the lower & higher frequency ranges.
It is different when comparing 320 and Audio CD, but 128 and also 192 are still poor qualities compared with CDs <_<
If you're used to compare using your PC Cd player/burner it is most likely true that you can't hear a big difference, but if you use a Hi-Fi the difference shows up clear.
Hope this helps & have a nice day :)
....very well trained musician's ears here... :rolleyes:Quote:
P.S. Can you hear my sarcasm? :lol:
ok your trying to tell me 192 is a poor quality u are joking :lol: :lol:Quote:
It is different when comparing 320 and Audio CD, but 128 and also 192 are still poor qualities compared with CDs
128 maybe yeah
Ciao adthomp ;)Quote:
Originally posted by adthomp@21 June 2003 - 09:20
ok your trying to tell me 192 is a poor quality u are joking :lol: :lol:Quote:
It is different when comparing 320 and Audio CD, but 128 and also 192 are still poor qualities compared with CDs
128 maybe yeah
No, I'm not joking and I didn't say 192 is absolute poor quality: I said it is still poor compared with CDs.
IMHO, 192 is the best "quality/file size" compromise: higher compressions lower quality and lower compressions increase the file size.
But again, 192 is NOT as good as CD quality. :rolleyes: ...only 320 can compete and 128 is definitely poor.
Please note : IMHO B)
Have a nice day ! :)
yes 320 is near CD quality honestly I cant tell the difference bwteen 192 and 320 also I think its just a waist of tim e and room on my HD
I agree that it is not wise using 320 because it occupies way too much space.Quote:
Originally posted by adthomp@21 June 2003 - 09:43
yes 320 is near CD quality honestly I cant tell the difference bwteen 192 and 320 also I think its just a waist of tim e and room on my HD
If you can't ear difference between 192 and 320 it is probably due to the hardware you use when listening to music, but you can try a simple test by ripping & burning a couple songs that you know very well in both 192 and 320 and then listen to them through the "phone" output of a Hi-Fi stand-alone MP3 enabled Cd or DVD player...
Hi-Fi circuits are very different and the performance is far better than the one you can obtain form the best CD/DVD player on a PC...
If you need to know what I talk about, that works for sure :)
Have a nice weekend ! :P
Hey MDB/nightcrawler - I don't think it's a stupid question. Some people have got better hearing than others, just like some people have more acute eyesight. And if you work in music, if you're a sound engineer, or if you're blind, then of course you're going to develop your hearing even more. No probs...
Maybe its becasue IO have a $10 pirce of shit speakers coz I cant tell any differnece though them yet when its burned and I paly it on a good stero I can tell the difference
Fully agreed dfhsfgjdgjdg, but believe me, using the proper player the difference between 192 & 320 is cristal clear also for normal and not trained people.Quote:
Originally posted by dfhsfgjdgjdg@21 June 2003 - 09:56
Hey MDB - I don't think it's a stupid question. Some people have got better hearing than others, just like some people have more acute eyesight. And if you work in music, if you're a sound engineer, or if you're blind, then of course you're going to develop your hearing even more. No probs...
Don't forget that CD/DVD players & burners installed on PCs were born for data, not for music, and they cannot perform like Hi-Fi devices because of their deep differences in circuits and components.
I could surely explain it better in Italian, sorry... :(
Take care ! :)
Wow Didnt Expect that many replies!!
Well Its Not Just About the sound quality which is pretty damn important if u ask me since i listen to alot of music at work but i also think it would be easier too.
Ive Lost count of the the amount of times ive tried to download an albums worth of mp3's and half of them turn out to be fake ,Poor Quality Not all there or tampered with in some way by some lamer with nothing better to do.
I think I would rather download a perfect image of a cd then do whatever i want with it without all the fuss and and frustration of finding the perfect mp3's
P.s Thanks For All the Replies
:blink: Night Crawler :rolleyes: