See you all in about 6 months.
Please don't cry.
Fuck, this board is eating itself from the inside out.
Printable View
See you all in about 6 months.
Please don't cry.
Fuck, this board is eating itself from the inside out.
is that not a good thing?
TTFN mate, catch you the next time you are passing thro'.Quote:
Originally Posted by chalice
All the best to you and your's, may the road rise to meet you.
:o
How dare you turn up here after years of ignorance and declare another 6 months orf.
It's unjust, so it is. :no:
"so it is", nice touch.
I thought so too, so I did.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by chaliceI thought so too, so I did.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
Go now, so manker can start posting again. :naughty:
I'm going, so I am.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by chalice
Go now, so manker can start posting again. :naughty:
Good idea, so it is.Quote:
Originally Posted by chaliceI'm going, so I am.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
The current masochistic tendancy of the board is interesting. In 6 months it will have either taken to religion or be festoned with nipple clamps (or maybe both come to think of it :unsure: ).Quote:
Originally Posted by chalice
I am given to understand that the former pre-supposes the latter for you Witch chaps.Quote:
Originally Posted by BigglesThe current masochistic tendancy of the board is interesting. In 6 months it will have either taken to religion or be festoned with nipple clamps (or maybe both come to think of it :unsure: ).Quote:
Originally Posted by chalice
Two speeling mistakes in one relatively short post, that's very un-Leslike.
Classic Freudian double error there. Freud noted that single errors were rare and that an error was often compensated by a complimentary second error. I think the chap may have been on to something (despite the flower/dream/sex thing) because I never noticed festooned's rather jarring lack of a second o. I have tendency to mis-speel tendency - not sure why :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by Chip MonkI am given to understand that the former pre-supposes the latter for you Witch chaps.Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggles
Two speeling mistakes in one relatively short post, that's very un-Leslike.
PS - we get our nipple clamps from the Inquisition as they own intellectual property rights on them - (discounted, as other relgions get favourable rates, obviousment)
Bye. Was nice having you around, chalice.
Always bearing in mind that Freud was a raving lunatic.Quote:
Originally Posted by BigglesClassic Freudian double error there. Freud noted that single errors were rare and that an error was often compensated by a complimentary second error. I think the chap may have been on to something (despite the flower/dream/sex thing) because I never noticed festooned's rather jarring lack of a second o. I have tendency to mis-speel tendency - not sure why :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by Chip Monk
PS - we get our nipple clamps from the Inquisition as they own intellectual property rights on them - (discounted, as other relgions get favourable rates, obviousment)
I think Emma is quite sexy. I also love her voice with the cute wee thing which is almost an impediment, but in a good way.
http://www.jla.co.uk/images/Artists/FreudEmma1P.jpg
Both points are sound.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chip MonkAlways bearing in mind that Freud was a raving lunatic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggles
I think Emma is quite sexy. I also love her voice with the cute wee thing which is almost an impediment, but in a good way.
http://www.jla.co.uk/images/Artists/FreudEmma1P.jpg
I didn't know such picture existed.Quote:
Originally Posted by BigglesBoth points are sound.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chip Monk
:coat:
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Chip MonkI didn't know such picture existed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggles
:coat:
Perhaps Mulder could do one of his artistic interpretations for us.
Nah, Barbie's are better.
Not the dolls like.