Like TB, WB of Middle East etc.
What do you think?
Printable View
Like TB, WB of Middle East etc.
What do you think?
yes, it's always funny to see the threads...
nah, not rly it's lame behaviour...
yes
explain why plzQuote:
Originally Posted by Polarbear
Yes! like the country of cheaters....
whole countries of cheaters?Quote:
Originally Posted by spark
kinda wrong...:blink:
LOL wat u talkig about it's just like saying we should't pass americam to europe becouse they living in coutry of killerssQuote:
Originally Posted by spark
IT'S SICK
yes, because i've seen statistics.
there are countries with a cheater/leecher rate of over 85% on a tracker.
there are several reasons for this, but it's a fact.
agreed :DQuote:
Originally Posted by tooxanLOL wat u talkig about it's just like saying we should't pass americam to europe becouse they living in coutry of killerssQuote:
Originally Posted by spark
IT'S SICK
@SliDer5: You really got bored today, didn't you? :D
If the trackers can't help themselves through other means of identifying cheaters, then banning country-wide IP-ranges is certainly the safest option for the tracker and all the remaining members. Some tracker staff should always consider the needs of many above the needs of a few, that's unfortunately not very fair or popular for a certain group of people.
statistics might be wrong, think of yourself - how would you feel if your entire country was banned?Quote:
Originally Posted by Polarbear
He want his privs back :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by lingo
absolutely agreed :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
even if I would I can't get them back ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by sparkHe want his privs back :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by lingo
FST = Filesharing Talk :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by lingo
If 70% of my country are cheaters/f***kers then I am 2 and I deserve it :)Quote:
Originally Posted by SliDer5statistics might be wrong, think of yourself - how would you feel if your entire country was banned?Quote:
Originally Posted by Polarbear
it is wrong, there are smart system to prevent cheating, not a massive punishment! :huh:Quote:
Originally Posted by sparkIf 70% of my country are cheaters/f***kers then I am 2 and I deserve it :)Quote:
Originally Posted by SliDer5
pretend you are tracker staff.
-you get 100 users from country xyz every month
-85% cheat or leech their ass off
now you have to ban 85 single users. it's a timewasting process.
ban the whole country and you save time and work. for the benefit of the good users.
of course it's hard for the 25 good users of this country, but what are you gonna do?
yeah i agree with polarbear...but sometimes banning an entire country doesn't work...u have to disable their accounts too coz their can enter from a box or a proxy
There is a site with a smart system! and 90% of you keep complaining about it everyday! The Great OiNK!Quote:
Originally Posted by SliDer5it is wrong, there are smart system to prevent cheating, not a massive punishment! :huh:Quote:
Originally Posted by spark
still wrong, now days you don't need to 85 users all is automatic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Polarbear
Well, spark, banning a whole country is the easiest and fastest option. If you do it manually, you'll never see the end of it with too many cheaters following the already disabled ones. If you do it the oink way, you will encounter a certain amount of people who were disabled by no mistake of their own. I'm convinced that a 'smart system' like theirs works, but it's does make some mistakes - some trackers can afford that and oink is certainly large enough ;)
the first and most important rule of a cheater is: never ever admit that you cheated.Quote:
Originally Posted by SliDer5still wrong, now days you don't need to 85 users all is automatic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Polarbear
most of those 85 users will complain, whine and say they didn't do nothing after they've been banned.
that involves a lot of work and good nerves.
trackers don't ban countries for no reason. why would they?
No offense... I think you are acting a bit hyperactive today, but you have come up with such interesting topics. Good job... :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by SliDer5FST = Filesharing Talk :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by lingo
absolutely not, it's ridiculous to label a whole country as cheaters and these trackers are the closest thing we have to self-governing communities in the world no geographical region should be excluded we should be priding ourselves on the fact that we are part of something that does not care about borders
I can live with OiNK mistakes :) OiNK has the best rules I've ever seen, best script I've ever heard about...and they'll never ban a whole country, simply the do not need to...Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
smart system is the solution, not a massive punishmentQuote:
Originally Posted by sparkI can live with OiNK mistakes :) OiNK has the best rules I've ever seen, best script I've ever heard about...and they'll never ban a whole country, simply the do not need to...Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
That's what most people will say until their own account was disabled for reasons unknown ;) But like you said, oink has probably the best scripted way to recognize cheaters and that's a good thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by spark
may be for the sake of racism.Quote:
Originally Posted by Polarbearthe first and most important rule of a cheater is: never ever admit that you cheated.Quote:
Originally Posted by SliDer5
most of those 85 users will complain, whine and say they didn't do nothing after they've been banned.
that involves a lot of work and good nerves.
trackers don't ban countries for no reason. why would they?
we wish for it, but there are always some part of people that should put a bordersQuote:
Originally Posted by Dylster
don't go there ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by SkullForcemay be for the sake of racism.Quote:
Originally Posted by Polarbear
i agree with you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylster
but unfortunately bittorrent sites are not part of the unesco
banning it not about cheaters today, mostly of Ddos attacks, and there are a perfect solutions for that.
is your country banned, slider5 ?
Banning a whole country may be a solution for the tracker, but it is not justical at all. ISP ban is all wrong while IP ban is okay for me and OiNK is doing a great job even if I don't like the staff there. A friend in my dormitory was banned b/c he was using the banned IP which I was using the last year. :/
PS: I missed why you have "DISABLED PRIVS" SliDer5. You mind sending me a PM about it if you don't wanna go off-topic here? :P
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Polarbear
my country does not exist anymoreQuote:
Originally Posted by Polarbear
Hell No! Totally Unfair!
well, that's great. would be hard to ban a country that doesn't exist, wouldn't it?Quote:
Originally Posted by SliDer5my country does not exist anymoreQuote:
Originally Posted by Polarbear
messed with my sig and forgot the rules, now paying for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by lingo
Germany exists very wellQuote:
Originally Posted by Polarbearwell, that's great. would be hard to ban a country that doesn't exist, wouldn't it?Quote:
Originally Posted by SliDer5
There's no reason to ban a country if your invite only, since each member will stay or go based on the merit of how they ran their account.
The big trackers would probably need to ban an entire range simply because the idiots keep signing up under new names all the time.
Yes, it's called null routing.Quote:
Originally Posted by SliDer5
20,000 IPs from one country give you crap, null route the country. DDOS over, site back up.
Of course you can always drop only the troublesome IPs, but it's going to cost you a fortune. Why should the tracker owners pay for that, especially if they don't get enough donations to pay for it?