Is JP back yet?
I'm not posting here till he is.
Fucking Nazi's.
Printable View
Is JP back yet?
I'm not posting here till he is.
Fucking Nazi's.
he's always been sexing nazis. it's the jp way.
Huh.... jp ?
Well sod you all. Especially Lynx. I'm going to go and pass my time playing scrabble on Facebook instead.
This used to be a place where friends could come and rip the living shit out of each other, and if needed, get some damn good support and advice. A damn good member got punished because some twat has no sense of humour or the lack of techological savy to stop his browser jumping around.Mate I'm a lass and I sorted it out inside a minute so why did you get so pissed? Time of the month or something???
huh...?
your a man you obese fack
Mr. JP Fudgley
Cant sux duh wht??cx?
mievmo, your a facking n00b so shew
Crabman and Spider dude, you two special people are so slow at typing its facking unbelievable.
awww mr.mystery is back......
Crabman, youve been viewing this thread for about an hour without posting, you facking retard.
Zat yew JP? :blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.mystery
yes
now sUck my peniz like everyone does.
Many happy returnsQuote:
Originally Posted by mr.mystery
I'm off to bed but I trust you will set about them good style :dry:
I'm a broken woman without him. Sob.
your not even a women with or without him, you manly man
That's mostly true. I got told by a fresh faced 19 year old earlier that I was scary as fuck. :happy:
your not scary, but a man pretending to be a women, you facktard.
Sexist cunt.
man
What? :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by CrabGirl
You really really dont want to know honey.
"honey"Quote:
Originally Posted by CrabGirl
your sooo not a girl, stop trying "mate"
If I was a man, what would you call me?
Crabman, like i did before, ffs your slow and your always a post behind, what a dumb fackQuote:
Originally Posted by CrabGirl
Just seen this.Quote:
Originally Posted by CrabGirl
Sorry, if I'd seen it before I'd have responded.
Despite what you have presumed or been told, he wasn't banned for posting that link once, or twice, he was banned for posting it a third time after being told not to post it again without a warning, after complaints from other members.
That sort of behaviour has never been acceptable here, and it isn't going to become acceptable.
Thanks for responding. How many other members complained? I'm not a computer savy girl and it took me about 20 seconds to giggle at the thing and shut it down. So what it fecked your browser intermittently. I was at work today and sent my boss back down to the ground floor in the lift, which I found hilarious and my boss growled at but didn't lock me out of the building. Don't you think you are being a bit abrasive and prejudiced?Quote:
Originally Posted by lynxJust seen this.Quote:
Originally Posted by CrabGirl
Sorry, if I'd seen it before I'd have responded.
Despite what you have presumed or been told, he wasn't banned for posting that link once, or twice, he was banned for posting it a third time after being told not to post it again without a warning, after complaints from other members.
That sort of behaviour has never been acceptable here, and it isn't going to become acceptable.
Does it matter how many complained? Suppose I had done nothing about the complaint, would that have been acceptable? I don't think so.Quote:
Originally Posted by CrabGirlThanks for responding. How many other members complained? I'm not a computer savy girl and it took me about 20 seconds to giggle at the thing and shut it down. So what it fecked your browser intermittently. I was at work today and sent my boss back down to the ground floor in the lift, which I found hilarious and my boss growled at but didn't lock me out of the building. Don't you think you are being a bit abrasive and prejudiced?Quote:
Originally Posted by lynx
So he was told not to post it again WITHOUT A WARNING. He could have posted it as many times as he liked with the warning, nothing would have happened.
Try sending your boss down to the ground floor again tomorrow, and make sure he knows you did it deliberately. Think you'll get the same response?
go away, shew, with your boring posts
Yes it matters how many complained! Otherwise people could accuse you of abusing your mod position. People portray objectional behaviour every day in the LOUNGE ffs. You didnt have to click. I don't click on half the stuff these shits post because I know it'll be rank. Yup I'll send my boss down to the ground floor every day I can and cackle at doing so as he walks out of the lift shaking his head at me and making me make the tea for the rest of the day. I don't fucking work in a dictatorship which is what this seems to be.Quote:
Originally Posted by lynxDoes it matter how many complained? Suppose I had done nothing about the complaint, would that have been acceptable? I don't think so.Quote:
Originally Posted by CrabGirl
So he was told not to post it again WITHOUT A WARNING. He could have posted it as many times as he liked with the warning, nothing would have happened.
Try sending your boss down to the ground floor again tomorrow, and make sure he knows you did it deliberately. Think you'll get the same response?
I like smackheads, me. They give me something to laugh at. Keep posting :)Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.mysteryCrabman, like i did before, ffs your slow and your always a post behind, what a dumb fackQuote:
Originally Posted by CrabGirl
You are avoiding the real question.Quote:
Originally Posted by CrabGirlYes it matters how many complained! Otherwise people could accuse you of abusing your mod position. People portray objectional behaviour every day in the LOUNGE ffs. You didnt have to click. I don't click on half the stuff these shits post because I know it'll be rank. Yup I'll send my boss down to the ground floor every day I can and cackle at doing so as he walks out of the lift shaking his head at me and making me make the tea for the rest of the day. I don't fucking work in a dictatorship which is what this seems to be.Quote:
Originally Posted by lynx
Suppose I had done nothing about the complaint, would that have been acceptable?
Two choices:
Yes, it would have been acceptable
No, it would not have been acceptable
Pick one.
If you pick yes, that's the end of it. Of course, that means I'll simply ignore any concerns you have too.
If you pick no, then please explain what YOU think I should have done.
yeah he was fairly warned.
yeah websites are dicatorships.
yeah thats harsh.
it was only 2 days, he'll get over it...
I fell for it all six times and called him a SOB, but really I wasn't mad mad (like angery)...
Don't give me that shit. Bless you and your little power trip behaviour. I was asking a valid question. Exactly how many people complained before you banned him? You didn't answer.Quote:
Originally Posted by lynxYou are avoiding the real question.Quote:
Originally Posted by CrabGirl
Suppose I had done nothing about the complaint, would that have been acceptable?
Two choices:
Yes, it would have been acceptable
No, it would not have been acceptable
Pick one.
If you pick yes, that's the end of it. Of course, that means I'll simply ignore any concerns you have too.
If you pick no, then please explain what YOU think I should have done.
I wanted to know exactly how many complained about the thing you found to be unacceptable. Was it an unfair question?
My attention was drawn to the original thread by someone moaning about it (not an actual complaint), and I subsequently received one complaint. One is sufficient. Since I lost a download of almost 700MB I would have also complained, but complaining to myself seemed a little pointless. Perhaps your browser reacted differently to mine and the complainants, that's hardly relevant. The result is that he was asked not to repeat the link without a warning.Quote:
Originally Posted by CrabGirlDon't give me that shit. Bless you and your little power trip behaviour. I was asking a valid question. Exactly how many people complained before you banned him? You didn't answer.Quote:
Originally Posted by lynx
I wanted to know exactly how many complained about the thing you found to be unacceptable. Was it an unfair question?
However, for the THIRD TIME, he was not banned because someone complained, or that I lost a download, he was banned because he repeatedly posted a link that he was asked not to post without a warning.
Now, how about you answer my question.
I was one of the members that complained. I wil complain if someone does it again. Not JP as I have all 8 known of his accounts on ignore.
My reasons
1. I pay for my internet. What right has anyone, under false pretenses, to send a piece of software that disables my web browser?
2. I posted how to disable this software earlier. The third time it was 'linked' the method I had posted to get rid of it had been disabled. I am not suggesting that JP did this, he probably did not know. He had however been warned by two mods not to post it.
3 An American website that I visited disabled the right click to stop people stealing their 'pics' and stuff. They were ordered by their web browser that they were not allowed to do this. (It was pointless anyway as all you had to do was print the screen:)).
4. As I have said in an earlier post the internet are trying stop this type of malicious software.
5. What would happen if a few 'guests' had clicked this link? The only have two options. Don't come back or inform their web browser or Microsoft etc giving the name of the Forum and the poster.
6. The forum or anyone else can't survive without ISP's. If the ISP's decide to take action against offenders and the forum allows offenders to post such links, then the Forum will suffer.
7. Finally(Thank goodness:)) how come if this is such a great 'larf' have all the other members not posted this link? I will answer for you, it is because all the other members have more common sense than the member involved.
I have just realized that we have all broke rule 14 by discussing this.:whistling
You know what Lynx. I can't be bothered anymore. You did what you thought was right on the basis of one complaint and due to your status your word is law.