for gay sex, at a rest area?
im sure this is a united states thing.
Printable View
for gay sex, at a rest area?
im sure this is a united states thing.
You wouldn't believe the PM's I get when I log on here sometimes...
You know who you are.
not me, you probly get that because you look gay so gays will approach you. im too scary to be approached by women let alone men.
It's probably herbert. Ignore him :dabs:
or benchez.Quote:
Originally Posted by Barbarossa
I've never met any of you IRL, so no.
If you look gay as in if your appearnce and behaviour is considered to be gay then most likely you will be approached by a gay guy. If you dont look or sound gay then chances are very unlikley that this would happened to you.
Back to the thread, No I havent
No. His guide dog steered him away from a smelly old bloke. Me.:lol:
When I was younger I am sure I was 'approached' and did not realize it. Homosexuality was never spoken about. IMO a lot of children suffered because of this. If you are not told what the dangers are how do you know you are in danger?
Can't resist a comment: It is important to distinguish between homosexuality and paedophilia. The former does not suggest the latter. Each one is a distinct form of sexual orientation.Quote:
Homosexuality was never spoken about. IMO a lot of children suffered because of this. If you are not told what the dangers are how do you know you are in danger?
homos, paedos - they're all pink on the inside :smilie4:
except the dead ones. They go yellow
I wouldn't stoop as low as snowultra. Maybe Smith. :unsure:
Why do you think this is a "united states thing"?Quote:
Originally Posted by snowultra
Happens to me all the time
It's known as cottaging in Britain. I'm pretty sure we invented it.
Not in the mind of homophobes, it's a classic response from that type of narrow minded prick.Quote:
Originally Posted by kallieb
I would much rather be a narrow minded prick than post a paedophile picture of a wee lassie. :angry: Thankfully someone in charge had the good sense and taste to take it off.Quote:
Originally Posted by SextentNot in the mind of homophobes, it's a classic response from that type of narrow minded prick.Quote:
Originally Posted by kallieb
Who posted such a picture.Quote:
Originally Posted by bigboabI would much rather be a narrow minded prick than post a paedophile picture of a wee lassie. :angry: Thankfully someone in charge had the good sense and taste to take it off.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextent
YouQuote:
Originally Posted by SextentWho posted such a picture.Quote:
Originally Posted by bigboab
Instinct is a good thing. naivety is cute but is not.
Sextent you naughty lad.
Maybe it was one of those looks-barely-legal-but-is-actually-over-age kind of photos.
When did I do this.Quote:
Originally Posted by bigboabYouQuote:
Originally Posted by Sextent
I have no idea what he is talking about, hopefully he will let me know.Quote:
Originally Posted by kallieb
I hear you. Baseless accusations that cut to our core and make us feel shitty are not pleasant events.
About a year ago. One of the Mods will enlighten you. I dont know who complained, if anybody. It was removed within short period of time.Quote:
Originally Posted by SextentWhen did I do this.Quote:
Originally Posted by bigboab
It was a pic of a wee lassie sitting on a 'rocking horse'. The head of the rocking horse was turned around and looking up the wee girls upturned skirt. It sounds by that description as a 'larf'.
However you have to consider that someone set this up using a wee lassie, then taking a pic of it.
As I said lucky there was a Mod online at the time and took appropriate action.
I'm sure I'm going to get an explanation of the accusation, just waiting for it. What confuses me is that if a mod thought I had posted such a thing, to the extent of deleting it, then the very least they would have done would be to contact me via PM.
How could I prove it if a Mod deleted the pic and closed the thread?Quote:
Originally Posted by kallieb
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextent
I agree they should have contacted you.
What the fuck are you talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by bigboabAbout a year ago. One of the Mods will enlighten you. I dont know who complained, if anybody. It was removed within short period of time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextent
It was a pic of a wee lassie sitting on a 'rocking horse'. The head of the rocking horse was turned around and looking up the wee girls upturned skirt. It sounds by that description as a 'larf'.
However you have to consider that someone set this up using a wee lassie, then taking a pic of it.
As I said lucky there was a Mod online at the time and took appropriate action.
You don't need to prove anything. It just causes a flame up and and no other useful purpose. The start of all this thread was about gay pick-ups, and then there was this assertion that somehow gay is the same as paedophile, and now there's this photo thing happening.Quote:
How could I prove it if a Mod deleted the pic and closed the thread?
Sounds like a good stopping spot.
Fuck that, this twisted prick has accused me of posting paedophile images. Which no-one else saw because the thread was deleted.
Other than me, only the Mod concerned can tell you.Quote:
Originally Posted by SextentWhat the fuck are you talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by bigboab
Oh really and who would that be.
I haven't got a clue. I am not lying about the posting of the pic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextent
So your story is that I posted this image in a thread, only you saw it and the thread was deleted by a mod, who never contacted me about it.
You really are a sick lying bastard. Do you seriously expect anyone to believe this.
You don't like me, fair enough and you revelled in it when you reported me for posting links to Rick Astley and I got banned for it. Even listing names to make sure none were missed.
This however is a whole different ball game, to accuse a person of such a thing. You are pathetic and twisted.
From the description it sounds like the picture of the Donald Duck ride in one of US Amusement parks which rather bizarrely has Donald (or one of those characters I forget which) with the head and eyes facing backwards. If it is the picture I am thinking about then it is not porn in the least and there are probably millions of photos in peoples albums with their kid sitting on that ride. However, it is rather odd and one wonders what they were on when they designed it.
If it was not that picture then I have no idea what we are discussing either.
You sick fuck. Don't accuse people of stuff like that. :angry:Quote:
Originally Posted by bigboabI would much rather be a narrow minded prick than post a paedophile picture of a wee lassie. :angry: Thankfully someone in charge had the good sense and taste to take it off.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextent
Les
He specifically said rocking horse and that it's head was turned round to look up her skirt.
I personally think it may have been his interpretation of whatever picture it was. In which case he's the twisted fuck. I for one am sure that JP or any other sane member of this forum would not have done such a thing, because for one it's wrong, and for two they'd have been hounded off the board whoever they were.
Well the Donald ride is sort of like that I think he is supposed to be floating on his back and the kid sits on the stomach - or something :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextent
But if it was a rocking horse then no I didn't see it.
No to the toilet thing too btw - obviously not their type or I frequent the wrong/right public loos.