sorry i cant create a poll but what resolution do ya prefer.
640x480
800x600
1024x768
1152x864
Higher
Printable View
sorry i cant create a poll but what resolution do ya prefer.
640x480
800x600
1024x768
1152x864
Higher
Higher!
There was a poll about this before. Kinda old but I'll go along.
1024x768 B)
My computer can only go 800X600 or 1024x768 :'(
I have it set at 1024X768
same me, thats due to me always upgading but forgetting about the monitor.Quote:
Originally posted by stonecold1203@24 July 2003 - 23:29
My computer can only go 800X600 or 1024x768 :'(
I have it set at 1024X768
I too have it set at 1024x768.
1024x768 32bit colour, on 14.1" laptop screen
1024x768 is jst fine with me
1600 X 1200 is my standard.
I have a 21 incher though :D
1024x768 works 4 me
800x600. My PC is shared by my family, and my parents always complain that 1024x768 is too small. :(
I use 1024X768! theres no better! lol i love it
1024X768 @100 Hz refresh rate
My monitor can handle 1600 X 1200 @70 Hz refresh rate, and this is a seventeen inch!
Same...Quote:
Originally posted by Livy@24 July 2003 - 18:33
1024x768 32bit colour, on 14.1" laptop screen
Agreed you couldnt start a poll but could have requested a mod. And i think this might belong in softwareworld anyways isnt it...
Got it set to 1152x864 I always used to prefer 1024, but then i discovered i could get better minesweeper times with higer resolution :)
Mines at 1024 by 786
on a 17" CRT moniter
1600x1200@72hz for games.
1024x768@100hz for desktop.
800 x 600~
800x600 but lotz of u like it smaller so im gonna try for a day...
I run at 1280 by 960 but can go upto 2048 by 1536 but that is ridiculously small.
I have a 22 inch compaq P1210 industrial monitor. It's the dogs danglies!
A lot of you prefer 1024x768, and guess what so do I.
Damn I must be bored posting in this thread.
Nice to see that you got your priorities straight now ilw :PQuote:
Originally posted by ilw@25 July 2003 - 02:44
Got it set to 1152x864 I always used to prefer 1024, but then i discovered i could get better minesweeper times with higer resolution :)
I use 800x600 because it's easier to work with small images that way.
Besides... my eyes aren't as young as they used to be! :geek:
1280 x 1024 at the moment [it depends on which monitor i'm using]
i already started a topic on may 13 What Resolution Do You Run? this is pretty much a carbon copy
so i'd bring forum rule seven to your attention;
I think it's general practise on this board to expect people to search before posting threads which have already been postedQuote:
Originally posted by www.klboard.ath.cx/bb/index.php?act=boardrules
7. Try to post in the correct forum. Take the time to look at the other topics, read forum descriptions, and see where your topic should go. Also, take the time to read the FAQs and other pinned topics. The administrators and moderators may move topics posted in the wrong areas.
i wish i could have started a poll instead, but such is life
[/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by echidna+26 July 2003 - 10:31--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (echidna @ 26 July 2003 - 10:31)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-www.klboard.ath.cx/bb/index.php?act=boardrules
7. Try to post in the correct forum. Take the time to look at the other topics, read forum descriptions, and see where your topic should go. Also, take the time to read the FAQs and other pinned topics. The administrators and moderators may move topics posted in the wrong areas.
Not wanting to start an argument echidna, but it's not surprising that a thread that hasn't been posted in for two months probably wasn't easy to spot when ultimatejester opened this one.
And if I'm reading the rule you quoted correctly... it refers mostly to posting in the wrong forum - which isn't the case here... or to duplicating "pinned" topics - which your thread isn't.
1024x768 any bigger and my eyes would explode....
Lord knows your eyes nearly pop out of their sockets when you see me as it is! :blink:Quote:
Originally posted by MetroStars@26 July 2003 - 10:49
1024x768 any bigger and my eyes would explode....
Not wanting to start an argument echidna, but it's not surprising that a thread that hasn't been posted in for two months probably wasn't easy to spot when ultimatejester opened this one.Quote:
Originally posted by tite-wad+27 July 2003 - 01:40--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (tite-wad @ 27 July 2003 - 01:40)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Quote:
Originally posted by echidna@26 July 2003 - 10:31
<!--QuoteBegin-www.klboard.ath.cx/bb/index.php?act=boardrules
Quote:
7. Try to post in the correct forum. Take the time to look at the other topics, read forum descriptions, and see where your topic should go. Also, take the time to read the FAQs and other pinned topics. The administrators and moderators may move topics posted in the wrong areas.
And if I'm reading the rule you quoted correctly... it refers mostly to posting in the wrong forum - which isn't the case here... or to duplicating "pinned" topics - which your thread isn't. [/b][/quote]
i was going to post this;
typing 'monitor resolution' into the search page, picking 'Hardwareworld', selecting 'any date' and hitting enter takes seconds
even on a slow dial up the result is available in under two minutes
but after experimenting [without putting my name in the member field] i have come to a new conclusion;
the search function sux
i was just wanting to encourage searching to try to cut down on duplication
i recall seeing a requests that similar topics be searched out before reposting somewhere here, i just figured that the rule i quoted entailed that intention
now i realise we are all destined to see the same topics ad infinitum
such is life
i didn't wanna tread on any toes by it only to try to make the board a bit more streamlined :lol: [as if that's going happen]
Oh I agree with you that the same topics/threads appear over and over ad nauseum. Often the same question is asked when the same one is just a few lines below the top - ridiculous! <_<
And I'd imagine if someone were to try a bit, they could find your thread with the search engine.
It's just that the old thread was essentially dead when this one started and that's why I thought perhaps the jester might not have realized it even existed. ;)
1024X768 looks the best for me
800 x 600 SVGA, it sucks, I might change it to XGA, I've used it previously, looks pretty nice, but my CRT's refresh rates are crap, so after a couple of hours at the screen, my eyes feel droopy ... :lol:
Sparsely uses 1152 x 864 @ 75Hz Refresh Rate on a 17" Panasonic CRT Monitor, 32bit color.
1024 by 786 suites me
1280X1024@100Hz
1024 X 768 is cool for me
using a 17" TFT
1024x768 for me at the moment. I'm thinking of getting a new TFT monitor soon though so think of the possibilites!
2048x1536 recently changed, since i'm using a 42" high definition tv for viewing. looks amazing, i'll never go back to a moniter again.
I just Love MOre And MORE FRAmes Per SEcond So I Still Use 800 X 600 I dont care about fucking graphics I just Love MY Frames Per Second ! :wub:
1600x1220 @60Hz 19''. Flat.
Same...Quote:
Originally posted by I.am+25 July 2003 - 05:56--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (I.am @ 25 July 2003 - 05:56)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Livy@24 July 2003 - 18:33
1024x768 32bit colour, on 14.1" laptop screen
Agreed you couldnt start a poll but could have requested a mod. And i think this might belong in softwareworld anyways isnt it... [/b][/quote]
i already asked the moderator but he sed that this has been done before and how wud this belong in the softwareworld
1024x768 @85hz ;)