Literally and figuratively.
Printable View
Literally and figuratively.
What
His cawk pic got removed and he got disabled.
True story.
Why, to both.
I not know.
Me not mod.
Who actually cares.
That would be like people caring when he was posting.
Why would one.
I care because I'm not sure that that pic was pornographic enough to warrant a kneecapping.
In your own objective opinion, what would be your verdict?
In my own objective opinion I don't give a flying fuck if he wants to post pictures of male genitalia.
However I can see how if it breaches the rules of the board he posted it on, fair do's. One lives by those rules or does something else.
That is maybe biased by the fact that I would never feel the same urge to shock. Maybe I don't crave reaction to the same pathetic extent.
The half-arsed, bedwards kinda issue I was tryna highlight was that there's a difference between the male member flacid and the male member rampant.
Haven't we seen dormant John Thomas's posted in the past with nary a sideways glance.
But as soon as some cunt puts a pair of googly eyes on said cawk, it's fucking get the fuck out of my living room time.
Anyway, I'm talking bawls. Bed.
Night night.
he posted one funny joke and i loled. true story :mellow:
We're not allowed to post pictures of cunts, at all. So it should be the same for dicks. They shouldn't be allowed to post either, I'm fed up reading villageshaman's posts.Quote:
Originally Posted by chalice
That one pic would not typically warrant a "knee-capping", no. However, he was warned on three previous occasions about posting genitalia. One of the times, it was for the exact same two images.
If he wants to ignore those warnings, he'll get an infraction.
Quote:
Originally Posted by callumWe're not allowed to post pictures of cunts, at all. So it should be the same for dicks. They shouldn't be allowed to post either, I'm fed up reading villageshaman's posts.Quote:
Originally Posted by chalice
what about drawings?
So, erm, posting two different pics would have been acceptable?Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
That small ?Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
Sorry guy's I'm having trouble with the quote button , weird . Not me the quote button .
The auld one had a varied genetalia fetish. :no:
Well, look what the cat drug in....
I don't half talk shite when I'm pished.
Re-reading the devastation, I now realise Geezer posted that cunt apple pic again, the one he was disabled for before, like.
To be fair though, I kinda provoked him in the desktop thread. But fuck 'im anyways.
There's people posting front bottom pics in the sexy lady thread, I thought that wasn't allowed either. Not just lady gardens either, actual genitalia.
Where's the consistency, it's like watching Scottish puntsphere referees ffs.
We try to be a bit lax in that thread. People tend to know what they're getting into upon entering it. Thus, posting pics with a small amount of frontal barely showing is hardly worth getting in a huff about.
Geezer is posting close up, full frontal, genitalia. The exact same pics of which he was warned for prior. If someone else were to have posted them (some who hadn't been warned already) they would have been removed and the member PM'd with regard to the rules.
There isn't much to compare here in my opinion.
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
That would be why you (plural) removed the cunt pics then.
Was the onion bloke who posted them banned, at all, even a wee bit.
There was more? I didn't go back much, tbh. :ermm:
So he'll be back, then, innit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
If it's just the matter of an infraction.
Infractions work like so:
There are standard infractions which merit 'X' amount of points per infraction. Every infraction will also have an expiration date. For example, an infraction for "Hostile Posting" is a standard 1 point and expires in 10 days. Accumulation of infractions prior to their expiration could result in the following:
Disabled Privileges - 5 Points (Cannot access Invites section or PM's)
Moderation - 10 Points (Posts are moderated and require mod approval prior to being viewable by the public.)
Disabled - 20 Points (Can only view Report section.)
BANNED - 100 Points
So if you see someone with Disabled Privs or Disabled under their name, that status is not permanent and will expire.
Oh really?Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
I always thought it meant they got to use the ramps and park closer to the door.
Where I live disabled means closest to the shop entrance, you can park here if you have a nice car and can't be bothered walking an extra fucking 20 yards or so. I hate those cunts.
Parent and child can be used so long as you have a child, of any age. They don't need to actually be with you. See also the 20 yard rule. I hate those cunts too but not as much.
Does this mean the quick reply doesn't wurk :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
Can you see all reports in reportworld :j2smilie:Quote:
Disabled - 20 Points (Can only view Report section.)
You can actually.
It's worth getting banned just to see it.