I'm a newsgroup guy but I was wondering what is the most sought after tracker and why?
Printable View
I'm a newsgroup guy but I was wondering what is the most sought after tracker and why?
overall? Torrentleech probably. it's one of the most popular.
I'd probably have to say that FTN is the most sought after overall because it is ratio free, has no minimum seed time, has great PRE times and speeds, is very exclusive, and has a great design. But it really depends on who you ask, because not everyone is looking for 0-day trackers...
And what makes a tracker leet?
well that is stupid then
I like your nick / avatar :)
The most sought after trackers will be useless to you if you're a newsgroup user.
Some trackers have things you can't find on usenet. The ones that specialise.
ftn is hardly the best.....only if you don't like ratios.
Speed is everything.
Running Linux I already have just about everything I'll ever need at my disposal for free and from fast servers. Things that I do download I want them fast.
If I'm in the mood for a movie, I find one I'd like to watch and grab it.. I get to watch an hour or two later.. I don't want to wait in line to have it complete 2-5 days later which by then I have decided I want to watch a different movie..
I missed Wednesdays Mythbusters, I grabbed all 1.3GB of it in 25 minutes and was on my way to watching it. And I would suspect that someone did the same as me only to then make it a torrent to up it on a tracker they needed rapport.
Lot of wasted steps and time if you ask me.
Agree. Unless it's something specialised, forget torrents. They are for kids. :smilie4:
:lol:
Well said. I think Beebo might get a look in too tho'
Beebo who?
Beebo Baggins.
http://www.tolkien-online.com/images...ing_a_pipe.jpg
Why do you think I don't use public trackers -_-?
IMO,All ratios do is to cause people to jump on all the new torrents, wether they want that torrent or not, just so they can form a buffer, so they don't take a ratio hit when they find something they actually want to download.
well its a double edged sword isnt it.
Without seeders the tracker would be dead as no downloader could complete anything.
but without downloaders the tracker is dead because the seeders have no one to seed to.
problem is most people want something for nothing, and with a tracker of 3000 ish members who have been there awhile, no ratio probably works. with a tracker of 10,000+ I can forsee a disaster.
OK 3,000 may play fair, but the rest will just take everything they can get and fuck the rest, as long as they get it, who cares, thats why i believe ratios are important, but they are not the perfect answer by any means, coming up with that perfect answer is a hard job though lol
Yes, I have a crap connection. And no, I don't hate uploading. I seed everything for a very, very long time. And that is on sites with no ratio, or a "minimum seed time". I guess you need ratios on larger sites, because not everyone in a larger site is going to care about wether people are able to download something or not, kind of like a bystander effect. But in smaller sites, no-ratio works well. I suppose that's why I like the smaller communities more :P
"Oh, there's plenty of other people here, they don't need me".
BTW, why do I "only deserve being on a public site"? There's no need for little attacks.
I would say FTN, maybe ScT.
ScT is most sought after and best
Stick with newgroups mate files tend to show up a tiny bit later then trackers such as ScT however newsgroups have tons more content and have far better retention.
I have never used newsgroups, I assume they have better speeds on old stuff. But I can grab 1.3 gigs in less than 25 minutes on a handful of trackers. s*c, s*t ect.
I realize seeds go away, but I have been able to get pretty good speeds on relatively old stuff at places like tl where there are a buttload of members.
Im not disagreeing that newsgroups are better or not, this comment just seemed off a little
The speed on usenet is relative to what speed your connection is obviously.
What he meant by the speed he quoted would have been his maximum.
The speed on usenet will always max out that sort of line. The age of the file is irrelevant. The files are hosted on a company's high-speed servers and remain there for up to 240 days.
Yeah, like I said I havent tried newsgroups (will eventually), and am not saying torrents are better.
This line through me off mostly "I don't want to wait in line to have it complete 2-5 days later which by then I have decided I want to watch a different movie..".
:beer: