Would u purchase more music if:
Music CDs cost $12
Music CDs cost $10
You could compile your own mix CD for $15
Forget CDs, eaiser to download
Still too high, $5 or less
Printable View
Would u purchase more music if:
Music CDs cost $12
Music CDs cost $10
You could compile your own mix CD for $15
Forget CDs, eaiser to download
Still too high, $5 or less
That's my opinion. It's not about money for me.Quote:
Forget CDs, eaiser to download
Quote:
Still too high, $5 or less
$5 is good...artists would still get the same amount from each album as they did when they sold CD's @$25 an album...Quote:
Still too high, $5 or less
i think downloading is much easier instead of getting up and buying the cd.
Here is the way I think it should work (not that you all care about my opinion). I would be willing to pay for music if the following conditions were met.
Have to option to download individual tracks or full albums. Give a per track discount for full albums. Thats is the way the rest of the business world operates: the volume discount. You get one price if you by 1 widget. You get a better price (and maybe even free freight) if you buy 100 widgets.
Have an option to pay a little extra to movie clips, special artwork, etc. The prices should be in the 25 cents (US) per track for a full album and maybe 40 or 50 cents for per track for individual tracks.
Make all the music available in a variety of popular formats and bitrates (mp3, ogg, ape, wma, etc).
Make available fast connections for downloading.
The record companies will still make their money. They would eliminate, or at least drastically reduce, manufacturing, packaging, shipping, and storage costs. This model won't come without sacrifices, namely the brick-and-mortar retailers but that is the tough reality of the business world. Just ask anyone in American steel or automobile industry.
get rid of the record companies. musicians record their own songs and put them up on the internet for 5 bucks or whatnot. they dont even get 5 dollars for every 20 dollar album.. this way, its better for the consumer and the artist.
Still buy a shitload of albums that i've dl 1st from the net...
Live by the rule... if you like it support the artists....
well if the music industry gave us the choice to just give the artist $3 out of the $30 we pay for a CD then I would the artist only gets taht much from a CD
why notQuote:
Originally posted by ultimatejester@20 September 2003 - 01:23
Forget CDs, eaiser to download
i8 say they wana f*** us so we f*** them but for 5 i'm cool :lol:Quote:
Originally posted by ultimatejester@19 September 2003 - 20:23
Still too high, $5 or less
i bought a cd variousa;bum other day cus i treated myself 4 having 2teeth out in dentist. £14.99 it cost me but im collecting the points ,and points means money
Forget CDs, eaiser to download and also I want Them as mp3.
BOT
Thats rightQuote:
Originally posted by jetje@20 September 2003 - 02:34
Still buy a shitload of albums that i've dl 1st from the net...
Live by the rule... if you like it support the artists....
They could still make a living if CDs were 10 bucks or less
No, it wouldn't make me purchase more music. However, when I do purchase music now, I'm never dissappointed with what I bring home. ;)
i guess im going to take back what i said earlier. I do buy albums at 15 bux apiece if i like them. im going to buy outkast. i went to the record store the other day and bough johnny cash and some grateful dead. ive noticed that prices have gone down considerably at tower records.
I paid 17$ the other day for the new Spiritualized, just cuz their label dropped them, and it's a damn fine CD.
I had, however, downloaded it about a month ago. ;)