these day lots of users use nude images in theyr sig and me and i belive lots of users cant surf page's with nude image in front of there family
so plz use something else
Printable View
these day lots of users use nude images in theyr sig and me and i belive lots of users cant surf page's with nude image in front of there family
so plz use something else
i think the rules should be changed
- semi-nudity (tits) allowed in topics, to please the sexiest ladies readers (including me)
- no nudity (bare-skin is ok) in avatars and signitures, because they can't be contained
Yes I agree with you, it's quite embarrassing for me. Especially for example if someone was viewing this website in a busy library or cybercafe.
Do you mean pics like my avatar?
Yours isn't as bad (as in embarrassing) as some of the others I've seen on this board.Quote:
Do you mean pics like my avatar?
This is already the case - bare butts aren't really offensive - everyone has one, but if someone has an issue with an avatar or a signature, please PM a moderator with the member's name so that we can deal with the issue.Quote:
4. There will be no offensive or inflammatory posts meant to offend or hurt any other member(s) or guest(s) including the use of photos containing obscene, grotesque or bare nudity in this forum. Please keep photos of this nature within the Lounge area. Nudity may not exceed topless in nature unless the lower extremeties are covered. Nudity posts can be edited or removed as deemed necessary by a Mod or Admin without question.
9. Signatures will be restricted in size and content which includes the use bare nudity. Signatures may not exceed a 495x150 pixels or 100,000 bytes combined in size. Signatures that do not comply may be removed or edited by a moderator or administator without question.
10. Avatars can not be uploaded; they must be linked from a web address or picture hosting site. They can not exceed 80x80 in size, and must not be offensive in nature which includes the use of bare nudity.
Thanks :)
also, its possible to disable the viewing of avatars and sigs when you have a problem with family looking over your shoulder ;)
@NikkiD - bare boobs aren't really offensive either, everyone has them ( just some are bigger than others) :lol:
:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by RPerry@20 September 2003 - 18:22
@NikkiD - bare boobs aren't really offensive either, everyone has them ( just some are bigger than others) :lol:
OK, I've just found out how to do it. For anyone who wants to know, go to My Controls, then Board Settings.Quote:
also, its possible to disable the viewing of avatars and sigs when you have a problem with family looking over your shoulder
:-"Quote:
@NikkiD - bare boobs aren't really offensive either, everyone has them ( just some are bigger than others)
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Somehow I think you guys are referring to me... <_<
eh.. paul has an ass avatar. and a damn fine one at that. so i think we should be able to post boobalies.
look at "Amarjit" sig and plz some 1 explain to him or pm modsQuote:
Originally posted by NikkiD@20 September 2003 - 21:06
but if someone has an issue with an avatar or a signature, please PM a moderator with the member's name so that we can deal with the issue.
Thanks :)
yes true if Paul can have a arse we all can fair is fair
Someone call me? B)
EDIT Like someone said earlier, if the administrator can have an ass avatar, why should we not be influenced by him?
you dont see anything more in amarjits sig thn you would on any beach, in fact a whole lot less
Amarjit's signature doesn't include any nudity - it is within these rules. All three women are covered (though not by much).
Although... it is over the filesize limit by about 30KB...
;)
It used to have some nudity (a nipple, as I remember), but he changed it as soon as a mod asked :).Quote:
Originally posted by NikkiD@21 September 2003 - 17:27
Amarjit's signature doesn't include any nudity - it is within these rules. All three women are covered (though not by much).
Amarjit's sig is just fine with me! :P
If you have a problem, or your in a public library or wherever, just turn sigs off.
Not to me.Quote:
Amarjit's sig is just fine with me!
It's not like it's difficult for that signature to be reduced in filesize or anything.Quote:
Originally posted by NikkiD@21 September 2003 - 12:27
Although... it is over the filesize limit by about 30KB...
Original : http://members.lycos.co.uk/kazaaliter2k3/signature.png
Reduced: http://www.uploadit.org/files/220903...edbySb1234.gif
- The original is 133k
- The reduced one is 45k
It used to have some nudity (a nipple, as I remember), but he changed it as soon as a mod asked :). [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by Lamsey+21 September 2003 - 17:29--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Lamsey @ 21 September 2003 - 17:29)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-NikkiD@21 September 2003 - 17:27
Amarjit's signature doesn't include any nudity - it is within these rules. All three women are covered (though not by much).
Pornstars clutching themselves.. :unsure: Nothing wrong with that :blink:
I had a couple of lovley bums but i have removed them for a bitta Christina! :D
Dave
I just made a new one. If anyone has a problem with it, and can give me a good reason why, I will change it. If you are in a public place, you could always just turn sigs off, or browse this board with images off.
where's tawny roberts?Quote:
Originally posted by KrackHead2k@21 September 2003 - 21:46
I just made a new one. If anyone has a problem with it, and can give me a good reason why, I will change it. If you are in a public place, you could always just turn sigs off, or browse this board with images off.
How many mods have posted in this topic so far...
I count 5...
Who's missing...
Balamm
Bender
Anyone else...
You guys are BUM bored...
Were board or your board, i am tired. :lol:
:PQuote:
Originally posted by Shad0w Hacker@21 September 2003 - 23:19
where's tawny roberts?
I'd never forget gorgeous Tawny Roberts... I'm looking for a better pic of her. Until then, I'll stick with Aria Giovanni, Briana Banks, and Sky Lopez. :wub:
I thoght the last was sky, i think your first pis of tawny was the best. (althogh i like tawnee stone more) :)
Yea Tawnee Stone is also very nice... :)
KrackHead2k, firstly i dont have a problem with your sig, i love it, but if i was offended with it i shouldnt have to go and turn off avatars, people want to see avatars and shouldnt have to turn them all off just so they dont see things that they think is offensive. They should be able to browse this forum without eyes in the back of their head.
Take this into account please
Dave
You are over the limit with about 30k ;)Quote:
Originally posted by Schumacher_Skaife@22 September 2003 - 11:56
KrackHead2k, firstly i dont have a problem with your sig, i love it, but if i was offended with it i shouldnt have to go and turn off avatars, people want to see avatars and shouldnt have to turn them all off just so they dont see things that they think is offensive. They should be able to browse this forum without eyes in the back of their head.
Take this into account please
Dave
I like them. In fact soon as I saw them my sabre lit up :blink:
nikki i live ur avatar. being canadian i wiish the leafs win the stanley cup in the next 50 years :PQuote:
Originally posted by NikkiD@20 September 2003 - 17:06
This is already the case - bare butts aren't really offensive - everyone has one, but if someone has an issue with an avatar or a signature, please PM a moderator with the member's name so that we can deal with the issue.Quote:
4. There will be no offensive or inflammatory posts meant to offend or hurt any other member(s) or guest(s) including the use of photos containing obscene, grotesque or bare nudity in this forum. Please keep photos of this nature within the Lounge area. Nudity may not exceed topless in nature unless the lower extremeties are covered. Nudity posts can be edited or removed as deemed necessary by a Mod or Admin without question.
9. Signatures will be restricted in size and content which includes the use bare nudity. Signatures may not exceed a 495x150 pixels or 100,000 bytes combined in size. Signatures that do not comply may be removed or edited by a moderator or administator without question.
10. Avatars can not be uploaded; they must be linked from a web address or picture hosting site. They can not exceed 80x80 in size, and must not be offensive in nature which includes the use of bare nudity.
Thanks :)
You are over the limit with about 30k ;) [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by Benno+22 September 2003 - 20:15--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Benno @ 22 September 2003 - 20:15)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Schumacher_Skaife@22 September 2003 - 11:56
KrackHead2k, firstly i dont have a problem with your sig, i love it, but if i was offended with it i shouldnt have to go and turn off avatars, people want to see avatars and shouldnt have to turn them all off just so they dont see things that they think is offensive. They should be able to browse this forum without eyes in the back of their head.
Take this into account please
Dave
Are you sure? I Thought it was around 64? If i am i will change it
Dave
I think Benno is right
avatar ~ 65k & each sig pic is ~ 30
:)
oh shit i didnt realise it was sig n ava combined, sorry ill get on it now
dave
What about mine?
Wizzandabe, your fine
Dave
I don't know why people are so desparate to use nude images... May be you think its your pleasure but it doesn't make any difference if you don't use them...
Great Sig! ;) ;) ;) :lol:Quote:
Originally posted by KrackHead2k@22 September 2003 - 05:46
I just made a new one. If anyone has a problem with it, and can give me a good reason why, I will change it. If you are in a public place, you could always just turn sigs off, or browse this board with images off.
I dnt have a problem with the sigs
at school i jus turn them off! loads quicker too ;)