Inflammable or flammable

Make your mind up. FFS.

What's the difference between the two.

Mmmm apart from adding."in" at the start of the word flammable there is absolutely no difference

I would tend to use inflammable

Perhaps more pertinent here - inflamed or flamed?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Biggles

I would tend to use inflammable

Perhaps more pertinent here - inflamed or flamed?

---

:lol:

Geniousles.

I use "burns". It's easier to type, and much easier to pronounce with a speech impediment. :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

I use "burns". It's easier to type, and much easier to pronounce with a speech impediment. :P

---

Neither of the words I listed have the same meaning as the word Burns. :slap:

Burnsable however I personally prefer CindiAry as in "Last night I had sex and was in Cindi Ary ".

I thought you might have written that In Sin Diary, rather than the public interwebs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Something Else

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

I use "burns". It's easier to type, and much easier to pronounce with a speech impediment. :P

---

Neither of the words I listed have the same meaning as the word Burns. :slap:

---

Then I use the word cheese. I've made enough sandwiches to know that cheese burns inflames if you forget it's on the stove.

Inflammable you say it to a homeless dirty person. Flammable is his ass after he get an unknown dangerous disease.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Something Else

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by megabyteme

I use "burns". It's easier to type, and much easier to pronounce with a speech impediment. :P

---

Neither of the words I listed have the same meaning as the word Burns. :slap:

---

Excellent.

Blame it on Latin and its tricky prefixes. In the beginning, there was "inflammable," a perfectly nice English word based on the Latin "inflammare," meaning "to kindle," from "in" (in) plus "flamma" (flame). "Inflammable" became standard English in the 16th century. So far, so good........

Comes the 19th century, and some well-meaning soul dreamt up the word "flammable," basing it on a slightly different Latin word, "flammare," meaning "to set on fire." There was nothing terribly wrong with "flammable," but it never really caught on. After all, we already had "inflammable," so "flammable" pretty much died out in the 1800's......

"But wait," you say, "I saw 'flammable' just the other day." Indeed you did. "Flammable" came back, one of the few successful instances of social engineering of language.....

The Latin prefix "in," while it sometimes means just "in" (as in "inflammable"), more often turns up in English words meaning "not" (as in "invisible" -- "not visible"). After World War Two, safety officials on both sides of the Atlantic decided that folks were too likely to see "inflammable" and decide that the word meant "fireproof," so various agencies set about encouraging the revival of "flammable" as a substitute. The campaign seems to have worked, and "inflammable" has all but disappeared..... Untill this thread...

You should cite your source when you c&p so much...

http://www.write101.com/W.Tips215.htm


Syn: burnable. Now my life is complete... :rolleyes:

Megabyteme I wrote that all by heart... lol... I threw in some periods to make it look like it was my work lol.

Well I really appreciate the explanation. Thank you.

I thought I saw some misplaced periods... :lol:

Flammable