Printable View
has anyone seen this? how is this diffrent from child pornoghraphy?please is there a way to help prevent this i feel this is worse than vcp (images edited to make a model look younger) is child models legal if not than how would i help towards closing these sites? write my goverment the fbi what i dunno but i think this needs to stop
You mean like the child model in your sig? <_<
You don't think she just started yesterday do you? And technically she is still a child.
where is the pix of the child model
Why do you ask? :blink:Quote:
Originally posted by shubhodeep_das@4 November 2003 - 00:21
where is the pix of the child model
@DL amanda bynes is not a super model shes the funny girl shes been on tv since she was 12 or somthing and thats not the type of model i was talking about search for child super models check out a few site youll get what i mean
I'm guessing there's one small difference that sets child pornography and child models apart, THEY'RE WEARING CLOTHES!
There's nothing illegal or wrong about children modeling, what's your problem?
They're wearing really skimy clothes
1. Who is they? I've never seen a Child Super Model, but I'm guessing they're just children who model, except they are super.
2. So what.
Which would you rather have, children legally modeling in skimpy clothing because they want to, and getting paid for it.
OR:
Children being forced to perform sexual acts illegally? I'd say there's much bigger fish to fry then cracking down on skimpy clothes. What do you want to happen, Nation or Worldwide dress codes?
neither
There was this child model on a television program yesterday morning, she was 12 years old, she got to wear designer cloths and got paid by the thousands.
...It's not exactly the same as kiddy porn :lol:
search for child super models visit a site and tell me this shouldnt be considered child porngraphy
Okay, this shouldn't be considered child pornography.
For it to be pornography they have to be nude, not fully clothed. If you consider that to be pornography then what do you do when you skim across the lingerie section in the sunday ads?
but there like 7 to 13 whatever you seriously dont think this is wrong there is pictures focused on there underware
It doesn't matter, there's nothing illegal about it, they're not nude and it's not child pornography.
So you were searching for..........???Quote:
Originally posted by DrunkeNStylE@4 November 2003 - 12:53
search for child super models visit a site and tell me this shouldnt be considered child porngraphy
Thank you for telling about your interests........
:blink: Yogi
i was gonna make anouther amanda sig looking for teens celebs famouse teens amanda etc for some pics that i dont already have and i stmbled accros a site called young super models the description said teens famouse teens so i checked it out and i was horrified with what i saw anyway i dont have to justify myself to you i dont care what you think about me buddy you dont know me
We know you enjoy looking at underaged teens who model, seems like you're the only here who has supported this in any way and yet you're the only one who's opposed to it morally. Oh the irony.
Actually, it wouldn't be. ;) Pictures of nude children isn't CP. Heck, teen and pre-teen nude photography has been a form of art for decades (was a big thing back in the early 1900's, apparently). It's 100% legal too.Quote:
Originally posted by ScotchGuy@4 November 2003 - 11:01
Okay, this shouldn't be considered child pornography.
For it to be pornography they have to be nude, not fully clothed.
So you were searching for..........???Quote:
Originally posted by SensualGardening+4 November 2003 - 12:19--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (SensualGardening @ 4 November 2003 - 12:19)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-DrunkeNStylE@4 November 2003 - 12:53
search for child super models visit a site and tell me this shouldnt be considered child porngraphy
Thank you for telling about your interests........
:blink: Yogi [/b][/quote]
My thoughts entirely SensualGardening - my question is: "Why would i search for that anyway?" :wacko: :x
Peace
UKMan
Perhaps he's a famous drummer for a rock band and was researching it for a project :D
DrunkeNStylE if you dont like this thing about child supermodels etc, why you got a pic of a 'child' in your sig? (she older than me though ) <_<
What made you think to do this in the first place? Don't you like adult models?Quote:
Originally posted by DrunkeNStylE@4 November 2003 - 10:53
search for child super models visit a site and tell me this shouldnt be considered child porngraphy
This is last comment i will make here, because i can see it turning nasty soon.
As a parent (with 3 girls) i have allways been proud of them and of course have many momentos of them with photos and of course the occasional video. Some of the photos are of course taken on the beach, at home in the garden and other places where they, as young kids do, pose in front of the camera and make like models or whatever. These are innocent pictures that i will treasure for the rest of my life.
However, what i would never ever dream of or even think of is allowing those pictures to be published for all to see, even if they are innocent. The mere fact that the parents of these poor innocent children are using and exploiting them in the way they are over the Internet is in itself a serious crime - thats my humble opnion - and i can only guess at the motives of these parents. What that child will go through in later years when she understands the full implications of those pictures being exploited over the Internet will be a nightmare to say the least.
I can only hope that is what DrunkeNStylE is trying to get at. But i cannot understand why anyone would want to search for such sites in the first place - expecially on this forum.
Peace
UKMan
Some, not all, parents of child models are crazy and force the children to be isolated from society and starve themselves to stay thin. The popularity they gain through modeling does not make up in their loss of childhood. 10 is too young to professionally model.
Child pornography is the lowest form of entertainment and the sickos who watch, make, and allow this to happen (bad parents) should be tortured and burned.
I agree with drunkenstyle completely!!
I tried his search (don't flame me :angry: ), I googled "child super model" and all I found was porn sites. So I tried www.childsupermodels.com. It worked. The third picture on the site's main page is of an 8 year old wearing a bra with the strap hanging off of her shoulder.
Models do the bra off of the shoulder thing because it makes guys imagine the bra coming off. Models pull there panties down with there thumb to make guys imagine the panties coming off...it's that simple.
The life of a super model:
1. Girls want to be them
2. Guys want to screw them
So how is it right to give children the same status?!?!?!
I know that this isn't 'illegal', but how can you deny that is pornography. pornography doesn't mean nudity. When 2 people are 'making love' on TV, that is softcore porn, they don't need to show the nipples. If someguy got off everytime he saw a jar of peanut butter....pictures of peanutbutter would be porn to him.
drunkenstyle, you should bring this topic up in a more "mature" forum, it wont get anywhere here
dudes theres nothing rong with child moddeling, what about all the kids that model for the sears catalouge?or the weekly flyer? these kids make alot of money 2. and most of the time they r forced 2 put it in the bank for a car or colage or a house one day. ;)
as long as they wear clothes and dont model thongs or items like that - who cares !
Child modelling is totally wrong and the people who do it should be severely punished.
mabey peeps should read my whole post before making foul accusations of me like i stated i think this is wrong those of you who dont think this is wrong seriously need to check out a site after that if you can tell me this dosnt disturb you than you need to check yourself i mean what if this was you little daughter. thanx to you who do agree with me. BTW yeas thats a 17 year old girl in my sig i am 19 we are praticaly the same age group
she's still jailbait in most american states.
Child modeling is right as long as it's tasteful, when people pose like this you aren't supposed to be looking at the clothes. This kinda of modeling is purely for sexual purposes, and now they are making kids do it.
I saw an HBO special on Child Models, and in my opinion, it is a living hell for the family. The child doesn't have a normal life, and the family spends tens of thousands of dollars. The siblings of the child model are not treated the same either.
Sorry, DrunkenStyle, if i offended you.Quote:
Originally posted by DrunkeNStylE@4 November 2003 - 13:25
i was gonna make anouther amanda sig looking for teens celebs famouse teens amanda etc for some pics that i dont already have and i stmbled accros a site called young super models the description said teens famouse teens so i checked it out and i was horrified with what i saw anyway i dont have to justify myself to you i dont care what you think about me buddy you dont know me
But searching for ....... is asking for what you were so surprised about.
I don't think you have any bad intentions whatsoever.
And i don't think it's wrong for somebody your age to fall for girls Amanda's age.
Kid's posing for advertisements(clothing, candy) is not wrong in my opinion. As long as it is the kid's choice.(and it is told about possible consequences....)
For the rest: see ukman's contribution.
:lol: Yogi
And if you don't care what people think, because you don't know them; why post it???
@SensualGardening its all good im not offended or nething i just didnt want peeps to get the wrong impession you know what i mean