Printable View
I'm looking to change my fav client utorrent ,because of the disk overloaded it piss me of ....i tried all the trick i found none of them work i bypassed somehow of the message disk overloaded but after some time my speed is going down...
at disk cache i even put 1024 mb...:yup:
currently i'm using utorrent 2.0.4 the newest version 2.2 it's loading to slow even if have 4gb of ram LOL
my HDD reads & writes with 50mb/s i don't see the problem...
use deluge..
You forgot to say which OS you're using, and whether you're using a seedbox.
deluge is good, anything but modded utorrent :P
Would you care to elaborate? The only times I've had that issue is when I transcoded video to the same drive I was leeching on, and that's no more since I now have separate drives.Quote:
Originally Posted by johhny
Anyway, I second Anarkial's comment, if your desire to switch is so big.
:unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbucker
I've only had that issue on failing drives. May want to run some drive diagnostics as it may not be utorrent causing your issues... At the very least, back up your data in case...
Edit: I transcode all the time on the same drive that I leech/seed on, and its an old IDE drive too. Guess I'm just lucky?
Qtorrent is a very good utorrent alternative and best of all its open source http://qbittorrent.sourceforge.net/
I guess so, specially if your connection speed is better than mine. I use viDrop (which is a mencoder frontend) for those tasks, maybe which program you use makes a difference. Or it could also be the you're using a large disk cache in uTorrent - I used to work around the issue by setting it to 500MB.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokeman
i don't use a seedbox i have fast connection i heard deluge it dosen't show disk overloaded but the speeds are lower than utorrent.
i'll give a try with qbittorrent...i'm using win7 x64 version
And I've heard Deluge can actually be faster and upload more in high-speed connections :ermm:Quote:
Originally Posted by johhny
Just try it, I guess...
that's nice but the deluge client dosen't have a stop option for torrents only pause?confused
I think pausing in Deluge is the same as stopping in uTorrent.
Yeah, I don't know what's up with that. It does have the nice option of dividing by tracker though - basically only important for those who use a lot of private trackers.
Isn't deluge heavy on resources ? Also it does need the gtk libraries .
Yes, it does need the GTK+ runtime, which adds some bloat. However, I have a 6-year old PC and it can run the Java-based Azureus without any issues, so any modern computer should be able to cope with Deluge.
Why don't you focus instead on tweaking your NTFS file system, like removing time stamps, smart placement, cache, etc ?
That would have a true impact on your performance.
Or move to FAT.
And its 4GB filesize limit plus extra fragmentation? Thanks, but no thanks... unless you were joking, in that case please ignore this useless post :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Anarkial
Vuze 4.5.1 (imho)
Good choice, but sadly, Vuze remains banned on a few popular private trackers. So, unless the thread starter feels like dual-wielding different clients... unless he's not a member there, of course.Quote:
Originally Posted by Timo_P
Besides what.cd, who else is banning Vuze?
ups... sorry, I didn't know(
PTPC for sure, then there were a couple of others whose names escape me. Maybe I'm just coming up with stuff. :idunno:Quote:
Originally Posted by Cabalo
I know Waffles initially jumped on the Vuze ban bandwagon, but allowed the latest versions after some time.
So, the only relevant tracker which bans Vuze is What.cd.
That's ok.
i'm on NTFS system the cache stamp is tweaked... and vuze is very slow at connection...i don't care they banend what.cd & ptp because i;m not member of any of that...
i don't care about resources...
Don't care about resources, and your having a resource (hard drive access) issue?
Ok then...
I think halite is the best alternative
Explain yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by johhny
slow to connecting at peers & speed it's a big difference...i think the most close to utorrent is deluge
@tokeman i was talking about RAM,about HDD it's reading & writing with 50 mb/s...so it's hard to believe utorrent can't handle a 11 mb/s job....
it's a config problem somewhere...
I don't know what your connection speed may be, but I've never had that problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by johhny
As Expeto said, Halite would be closer since it's coded in C++. Can't believe I forgot about it. :pinch:Quote:
i think the most close to utorrent is deluge
RevTTQuote:
Originally Posted by Cabalo
Didn't they unban it shortly afterwards?Quote:
Originally Posted by whatcdfan