Printable View
im a fairly heavy downloader, i don't know all the details, nor do i care to read them all unless its directed towards me.
Anywho,
I want to go back to downloading again, but im all paranoid about it...
What all do i need to do to not have to worry about downloading? :ph34r:
Thanks.
Well i hope you're a heavy uploader as well <_<
Download the latest K-Lite 2.43 with Bad IP Blocker and Privacy Patch, nothing to worry about, after all there's only 4 million of us to catch :lol:
DOWNLOAD HERE
That's what i was hoping to hear :-D
Mainly im just worried about getting sued or whatever, i dont need that money pressure on my parents B) .
It's impossible to get sued while using the latest K-Lite w/ Bad IP blocker and privacy enabled.
:) thats good to her though i wasn't that worried
Ya, ok <_<Quote:
Originally posted by Supernatural@29 November 2003 - 17:31
It's impossible to get sued while using the latest K-Lite w/ Bad IP blocker and privacy enabled.
Don't fill peoples heads with nonsense like that. Just because they can't see your whole list does not mean they cannot sue you. Just makes you less of a target.
Besides, if your ip keeps coming up in searches with different files, they got you there.
TD
how wrong you are... :)Quote:
Originally posted by Supernatural@29 November 2003 - 14:31
It's impossible to get sued while using the latest K-Lite w/ Bad IP blocker and privacy enabled.
Remember that they can't sue you for downloading music... only if you share a large amount. If they have no proof that you are sharing, they have no case. It's that simple.
your statement was wrong though, you only serve to mislead those who know no betterQuote:
Originally posted by Supernatural@29 November 2003 - 21:13
Remember that they can't sue you for downloading music... only if you share a large amount. If they have no proof that you are sharing, they have no case. It's that simple.
The only way for them to not get proof of your sharing is for you not to share.Quote:
Originally posted by Supernatural@30 November 2003 - 00:13
If they have no proof that you are sharing, they have no case. It's that simple.
Another point is that although they have been targeting people with large amounts of files, does not mean they will not get those with only a few. If I was them, that's who I would go after. Scare away the infrequent/light users and only need to worry about the die-hards(riaa, look they other way, don't need you reading this :P ).
TD
well it they get the people with only a few they are wasteing time and money
You scare more people away by going after anyone. Especially those with a few. Look how many of the larger sharers here feel safe by using the search blocking function.
If word gets out that anyone is free game and not just larger sharers, then many more of the smaller users will leave.
That doesn't seem like a waste of money to me.
TD
Well I certainly wouldn't leave, no matter what they do!!! :DQuote:
Originally posted by tracydani@30 November 2003 - 09:56
You scare more people away by going after anyone. Especially those with a few. Look how many of the larger sharers here feel safe by using the search blocking function.
If word gets out that anyone is free game and not just larger sharers, then many more of the smaller users will leave.
That doesn't seem like a waste of money to me.
TD
So they would be wasting money, in my view!!
LOL, I don't think they are too worried about the people on 56k :D I could be wrong though ;)
TD
:blink: :blink:
I am not on 56K !!! LOL!!Quote:
Originally posted by tracydani@30 November 2003 - 10:06
LOL, I don't think they are too worried about the people on 56k :D I could be wrong though ;)
TD
LOL, sorry. Thought I had read that somewhere :D
TD
RIAA has already tried to sue people (on accident) that weren't even running Kazaa. Then threatened them... when they realized THEIR mistake.Quote:
Originally posted by Supernatural@29 November 2003 - 10:31
It's impossible to get sued while using the latest K-Lite w/ Bad IP blocker and privacy enabled.
Whether they can prove anything or not doesn't seem to make much difference to THEM anymore.
All their list of your (supposed) shared files is good for/intended for is to strongarm you to settling out of court or getting a court order for MORE evidence (a full-scale fishing expedition if need-be)...including confiscating practically anything computer-related you own.
If you bend over and take it they could care less if you're innocent or guilty... it still has the same effect.
Bullies and assholes WANT you to be afraid of them.
Anyone here SERIOUSLY interesting in turning the tables on them needs to private message me.
What I will suggest is strictly legal, but...unusual...so I won't suggest it here.
Computer experience + networking experience is a must, so please only those who have that are can get 'up to speed' quickly need apply.
Dammit, you got my curiosity but I lack the skills :lol:Quote:
Originally posted by Switeck@30 November 2003 - 15:11
What I will suggest is strictly legal, but...unusual...so I won't suggest it here.
Computer experience + networking experience is a must, so please only those who have that are can get 'up to speed' quickly need apply.
Oh well, just clue us in sometime.
TD
Dammit, you got my curiosity but I lack the skills :lol:Quote:
Originally posted by tracydani+30 November 2003 - 08:36--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (tracydani @ 30 November 2003 - 08:36)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Switeck@30 November 2003 - 15:11
What I will suggest is strictly legal, but...unusual...so I won't suggest it here.
Computer experience + networking experience is a must, so please only those who have that are can get 'up to speed' quickly need apply.
Oh well, just clue us in sometime.
TD [/b][/quote]
Simple - turn the tables and start hunting them.
If their monitoring is in any way effective, it HAS to be quite a bit of bandwidth at the supernode level.
What if we started setting up supernodes to hunt for just that sort of traffic?