My friend giving me a invitation of awesome-HD. But i don have much Knowledge about it.
is that a good HD tracker?? Which one is the best..
And what do you think about the best tracker?? share your thoughts..
Printable View
My friend giving me a invitation of awesome-HD. But i don have much Knowledge about it.
is that a good HD tracker?? Which one is the best..
And what do you think about the best tracker?? share your thoughts..
I think its good....but not the best...most of here thinks it is the fourth best HD tracker....and its ratio proof is very effective.....there are many freeleech....75%, 50% and 25% but no full freeleech....many user use seedbox and u can survive there with a 128 KB upload speed....And they have some large collection of HD content....Now its up to u.....
Fuck all of 'em, go only for HDbits.
I don't know the tracker is best but they have the best internal encoders on the planet(my idea)
Thanks for infos mate..
http://filesharingtalk.com/threads/436531-Hd-tQuote:
Originally Posted by whatcdfan
:frusty:
*Fixed.Quote:
Originally Posted by whatcdfan
Awesome HD is setup very cleanly, well organized, strong focus on 1080p encodes and bluray remuxes (where they take the original video, audio, chapters and subtitles of a bluray and package them into an MKV). All the internals and almost all of the remuxes (which are also mostly internal) are 75 % freeleech, so even a small swarm shouldn't really hurt your ratio which at the highest is required to be 0.6.
On the downside, they don't have very many 720p internals or a lot of torrent activity in general. Only a handful of films seem to have snatches above 1000, the highest being 1807. I just remember having seen much more activity elsewhere. I also probably don't know what the fuck I'm talking about either, since I haven't been a member of that many sites. Either that or I'm trying to compare it to TV show releases. Either way, I'd easily recommend the site.
I'll just end up forwarding them to OlegQuote:
Originally Posted by whatcdfan*Fixed.Quote:
Originally Posted by whatcdfan
Sarcasm fail? :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by a7x
a7x & Me :oops:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mooi1990http://filesharingtalk.com/threads/4...wesome-HD-goodQuote:
Originally Posted by whatcdfan
This kinda disqualifies your request for HD-T.
:cheers:
Not good at all friends.. IPT is fine...
m using it.. provides good upload speed so that ratio stays good..
For remuxes HD-Torrents is much better as their internal group mux the orignal PGS subs, while AH-D remuxers mostly use SRT or IDX/SUB.
mjmacky: In my experience even for a medium sized tracker (20-30k) 1000 snatches is A LOT. You only see those numbers on huge trackers, open trackers or TV torrents.
Like I said, I probably don't have a clue what I'm talking about when speaking about general BT. As far as I noticed, original PGS subtitles ARE included in the remuxes, and all of them.
At AHD? No, you're completly wrong. It's SRT or IDX/SUB (aka VOBSUB), only a handful of the internal remuxes at AHD have the original PGS subtitles muxed.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
VOBSUB might have been converted from PGS but it still looks worse, even 1080p VOBSUB. With SRT you never know. Did they OCR it or just download from a subtitle site? Did they bother to do a good OCRing? That's the reason I got tired of encoders and just download/make remuxes.
Wasn't all of them, just all of the ones I've downloaded. I just looked at the 10 most recent remuxes, 6 of them had PGS. It looks like HiFi converts to text in each case. HDRemuX leaves the PGS but in a couple of situations converts to VOBSUB. I'm guessing they have multiple members in the groups, and each of them do it differently.
My preference is to have SRT. I always thought image-based subs look like shit, even the new style for Bluray.
Nah. 2/14 releases had PGS subs muxed on first page. The rest have VOBSUB/SRT. That's an handful, like I just wrote.
I'm talking about internal remuxers. KRaLiMaRKo isn't an internal group at AHW, neither is User-Upload. ;)