You can view the page at http://filesharingtalk.com/content/1...rough-in-Speed
Printable View
You can view the page at http://filesharingtalk.com/content/1...rough-in-Speed
All these students are indians ...Should be called Chili University , not Rice
Cibu you're an idiot. And whoever wrote this article is, too. True 4G technology doesn't exist. In technical terms we're somewhere around the 3.75 mark.
Nope , not an idiot . Am I an idiot because I tell it like it is ?
http://network4g.verizonwireless.com...rizon-wireless read this
@Darth Rings shutup 4g networks exists for long time you just didn't know:shifty:
cant even get plain 3g here still all stuck on 2g
@cibu That's because Indian students bother to learn something at school same goes for Chinese, it means that they're smarter than us ! :D
My local wireless providers all started calling their networks 4g. They claim that the definition has been changed to include anything above 3g speeds. That would make sense in my opinion; if console manufacturers were each to release a new console, each being only slightly better than it's predecessor, would you not call it an eighth gen console (7th gen being the current gen: 360, ps3, etc.)?
This all assuming that 3g/4g means "3rd/4th generation", which I'm now worried it might not be.:blushing:
these bastards jumped the gun! 5g isn't supposed to be out until 2019!!!
Chili is a country, and rice grows predominantly in Asian countries i.e. India
Along with phone makers, service providers are cheating ITU out of their mobile data system, and their specifications. It's a very broad topic that I can talk about for days really, (I've followed phones diligently for a decade and above).
The closest example I could give you is if (setting trademarks aside), HP, Dell, ASUS, etc. all got together and released a new kind of computer port and called it USB4, and then Best Buy came along and started marketing the first USB4 compatible PC's on the market on their shelves. Technically, without Intel's hand, and without the specifications Intel set for the research levels achieved before a working USB 4.0 system is on the market, this is just the name of USB bastardized to get mass appeal. Yes, USB4 might be faster than USB 3.0 by all means, but it is not what actual USB 4.0 technology is/is supposed to be. It's just a label.
You are correct that the G represents generation, but each generation is supposed to roll according to speed/range specifications that the international committee decides upon, and such speeds have not been achieved yet (I believe the 4G spec is 1Gbit/s, but the current "4G" phones can only hit a theoretical of 144mbit/s connections).
There was an unofficial 2.5G in the past, an official 3.5G, and this current "4G" generation is technically an unofficial 3.75G. Thought I'd include that so you can see that generations don't exactly go up in integers. Also, the time lapse between generations is unlimited. True 4G could be 2015, while true 5G could be 2050. It's not according to when new tech is out, it's according to when standards are met.