Well, I won't fall for it a second time! Keep your hands off my desk, boss!
Attachment 85690
Printable View
Well, I won't fall for it a second time! Keep your hands off my desk, boss!
Attachment 85690
You're not looking at the wider picture, you need to copy the handwriting on the 'hole here' postit score a couple of pads of green postits and randomly daub the aforementioned postit's at various places around the office, giving lots of ventilation to people you dislike ofc.
Natalie sounds hawt. i'd do stuffs to her hole. Sex stuffs :naughty:
there's loads of pubs here in brighton with glory holes in the mens room. True story :smilie4:
Brighton you say? :smilie4:
Natalie spends all day ordering men in overalls about. Natalie is the kind of woman women want to be and men want to do.
They must be right at your eye level too :pinch:Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Mulder
:glag:
:fist:
Quality midget joke to the max.
:rolleyes:
One the senior chaps in a previous job I was in was arrested for the glory hole thing in a pubic toilet. He successfully defended the charges by demonstrating to the judge (not sure of how this was done exactly) that he was too mighty for said hole and therefore the laws of physics forbade the crime having taken place. Result was that although there were the inevitable scurrilous sniggers these were outweighed with envious glances. Fortune favours the brave.
We get it Les, you have a big cawk.
FFS you don't have to ram it down everyone's throat, or rub our faces in it.
OK sure, but what about the "it was soft in, soft out" counter argument? Did it not matter due to the doubt? It's like someone who can't pull there fist through the theater cup holder, you would have to show a lack of cognitive skill or relentless stubbornness to pull it off.Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggles
No idea - I do know the defence was successful and the implication as reported (with much tittering) in the press at the time was that the member was infeasibly large in relation to the hole.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmackyOK sure, but what about the "it was soft in, soft out" counter argument? Did it not matter due to the doubt? It's like someone who can't pull there fist through the theater cup holder, you would have to show a lack of cognitive skill or relentless stubbornness to pull it off.Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggles
:naughty:Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
How do we knowQuote:
Originally Posted by Biggles
youhe wasn't the one on the receiving end?
Is there any other way? :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
Hmphh!Quote:
Originally Posted by SqueamousHow do we knowyouhe wasn't the one on the receiving end?
Is there any other way? :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
I understand that the other cubicle was occupied by an occifer or something else.
So it was surprising he wasn't screwed come to think of it. :huh:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggles
It strikes me, Les, that JP is a master of subtle nuance.Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
And thank God for that, huh, 'cuz sometimes he's just a bludgeoning half-wit.
For some reason, this evokes the memories of the velociraptors ramming the steel door in the first Jurassic Park. That, and King Kong breaking free before ravaging New York.Quote:
Originally Posted by BigglesHmphh!Quote:
Originally Posted by Squeamous
I understand that the other cubicle was occupied by an occifer or something else.
So it was surprising he wasn't screwed come to think of it. :huh:
Did the officer get paid leave for post-traumatic stress? :unsure: