http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/...cs-revolution/
Printable View
Faster than light particles are not that new of a... thing. No one has ever been able to prove that they exist but we know they do. Our universe for example is expanding faster than the speed of light.
He's still a spamtard, he's only posting links then pissing off, not exactly an endearing trait.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skiz
I think you're being too hard on Skiz ,he also occasionally talks football.
Time travel has always been possible. :unsure:
In the last 7 days I have travelled approximately 1 week into the future.
Yes, I truly AM this awesome. :happy:
So are you arguing science or theology?Quote:
Originally Posted by Skiz
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Barbarossa
I thought it was a basic tenet of Eisenstein's Unified Theory that such a particle couldn't exist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skiz
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...78L4FH20110922
That's why it's called a theory.
From what I understand (correct me if I'm wrong. I'm by no means a physicist) the universe itself is expanding beyond the speed of light. But anything within the universe is supposedly unable to reach speeds beyond light speed...I think.
The universal expansion rate is nowhere near the speed of light (yet). Contemporary physicists argue that someday it will be, though, and at that point when we look up on a clear night we'll see very few spots (our solar system). Personally, I believe they have made a mistake, as I think the conclusion they came to is unreasonable. Sure, the universe might be expanding at an increasingly increasing rate, but someday the old concept of gravity and other physical constraints will have to hold back its acceleration. I believe that this is like the age-old "where is the center of the universe?" argument. Until we changed our perspective to a birds-eye view, we were convinced it was the sun. I'm more than sure that a perspective change will amount to the same revolution with this concept - after all, there's no physical reason that the universe isn't already expanding at such a rate, if our theory was true and it has had 14.8 billion years to expand after the first energy release (which was undoubtedly its fastest boost).
Nevertheless, this isn't the first experiment of its kind. Light waves fed into an acceleration track will exit it before they even enter. The data back then was disregarded as erroneous, but there had to be some explanation for that which we did not understand back then.
Also Einstein's theory only played to mass-based particles not being able to travel faster than light. It had nothing to do with light itself, as until very recently it was still a possibility that light itself can travel faster than the standard speed of light itself.
Theoretical physics is like medicine, everyone pretends to know the answers but really it's more about making educated guesses and hoping for the best.
Yes..I'm just going by some things I have read. An article about metric expansion, for example. from what I read, space itself is expanding, making it possible for 2 really distant objects to be moving away from each other at speeds exceeding light. I'm sure there are people here better educated than me that could explain it much better, but that's how I interpret it.
I was 100% sure that ringhunter would definitely comment with a paragraph or more, and I wasn't wrong.
<3Quote:
Originally Posted by ringhunter
Note to self: Do not post in this thread yesterday.
Just doing my part to educate people. :idunno:Quote:
Originally Posted by Aby
I knew about this story two weeks before the author wrote it, which is proof in itself.
bullshit
We call that TheFoX News around here...Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFoX
Only if it's inaccurate, though!Quote:
Originally Posted by megabytemeWe call that TheFoX News around here...Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFoX
Just to clarify, the "speed of light" usually refers to how fast the massless radiation travels in a complete vacuum. Also, the implication stated in the thread title is a bit idiotic. Clearly they're just trying to figure out make your internet go faster.
walk in and out of a black hole. You ll have travelled through time.
/fixedQuote:
Originally Posted by harrydresden
/properly fixed.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrydresden
Hey now, inventing technology defeats the purpose of a hypothetical. Also, died may be a little too relative; all we knoww that Enron Hubbard is waiting for us on the other side.Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Rings/properly fixed.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrydresden
edit: post not edited, fuck I'm tired
If I could travel through time I would prevent the invention of the internet just so this thread would go away.
Overreaction you say? Not according to my theory of relativity.:idunno:
Undoubtedly, said vehicle will look something like this...Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Rings/properly fixed.Quote:
Originally Posted by harrydresden
Attachment 87232
I wouldn't mind seeing that vehicle accelerate towards a black hole