Skiz is the only one who can help us now.
Round up some of your friends, cross two borders and save FST, Skiz.
Printable View
Skiz is the only one who can help us now.
Round up some of your friends, cross two borders and save FST, Skiz.
:unsure:
Darthy, have they been spiking your wheaties with hallucinogens again ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhdiSqt6sXEQuote:
Originally Posted by Skiz
This kind of comment is exactly what Arizona is trying to outlaw.Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
I'm shocked, you realise that would reduce my repertoire to vague allusions of sexual impropriety, and casting aspersions on my victims heritage. :blink:
Also targeted.Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
Arizona just wants us to talk about fucking daisies. And titties. Basically anything that can make a man happy.
Sorry if my posts have become incredibly short. I'm just incredibly frustrated that while I sit in a room reading about man's advances into nano-sized particle therapy, about space suit advances since the year 1969, and about prediction algorithms for solar flares, people with real, legislative power choose to allocate resources to fucking curation. Everything that is wrong with bigoted, backwards beliefs is found in these very drafters.
Are you sure you got that right? I thought American legislators liked guns and rather dubious self defense laws, rather than sex (personally I'd rather be fucked than killed)judging from the news from Florida. Despite overwhelming legal opinion and overwhelming public opinon to the contrary the state is sticking to it's rather racist stance.Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth CiceroAlso targeted.Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
Arizona just wants us to talk about fucking daisies. And titties. Basically anything that can make a man happy.
Sorry if my posts have become incredibly short. I'm just incredibly frustrated that while I sit in a room reading about man's advances into nano-sized particle therapy, about space suit advances since the year 1969, and about prediction algorithms for solar flares, people with real, legislative power choose to allocate resources to fucking curation. Everything that is wrong with bigoted, backwards beliefs is found in these very drafters.
Its not right, man should be allowed to behave in as vile a way as he likes. There are no consequences after all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Cicero
I live in Florida, may be the cause of my utterly desperate requirement to flee the U.S. altogether. They are all ignorant superficial rednecks here, currently housing the worst governor in U.S. history. A story like the recent one does not surprise me in the slightest.Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
Did I ever tell anyone the story of how me and a couple of friends had to infiltrate a trailer park to beat the shit out of a group of meth-ed out skinheads that were hunting one of our black friends? Florida.
Thanks for proving everything that is wrong with this bill is true.Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesW
The fact that you can bring up your previous closet fears out into an argument not even close to being the same just screams "downfall" to this new bill.
Supply and Demand is an economic concept, you shining beacon of a real-world manifestation of Walter White, you.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
I genuinely do not understand the American fascination with shooting holes in each other in such large numbers. Being a primarily rural population and also having many sport animals some attracting hunting tourists, New Zealand has a strong gun culture. It is however properly regulated. Anyone who wants to own a gun must pass a test and get a photo ID like a drivers licence. MSSA's (Military Style Semi Automatic) are now banned. To purchase a weapon you MUST present your valid licence, and there are special classes of licence for handguns and collectors weapons.
I wish the musket would come back into style.
You should watch this series Top Shot.They gather a bunch of marksmen and shoot the fuck out of stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
That sounds like the worst recommendation anyone has ever suggested to me. I thought you said you were at least pretending to like me.Quote:
Originally Posted by IdolEyes787You should watch this series Top Shot.They gather a bunch of marksmen and shoot the fuck out of stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
They shoot the fuck out of stuff real good ?
Also stuff occasionally blows up.:)
And it's Anime.:yup:
:emo: :stalker:Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesW
I bet Dave couldn't make more than five posts of reasonable length before someone posts a balustrade smiley at him.Quote:
Originally Posted by ckrit:emo: :stalker:Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesW
Even if he tried particularly hard not to be mental.
I've never seen redneck anime, and if you find it to exist, well that would just blow my mind.Quote:
Originally Posted by IdolEyes787
Rule 34, pneub.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmackyI've never seen redneck anime, and if you find it to exist, well that would just blow my mind.Quote:
Originally Posted by IdolEyes787
Dear moderator, I feel a strong urge to yeehaw at this point, is there something wrong with me? :blink:
That rule doesn't apply to the reverse.Quote:
Originally Posted by mankerRule 34, pneub.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
How you orate during onanism is a personal thing and is no reflection on your mental state.Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
I hope :ermm:
I was about to say you should have quoted him. Anyways, I meant to say "doesn't apply in reverse" in my previous statement. Your error made me revisit my error.Quote:
Originally Posted by mankerHow you orate during onanism is a personal thing and is no reflection on your mental state.Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
I hope :ermm:
The mind bogglesQuote:
Originally Posted by mankerHow you orate during onanism is a personal thing and is no reflection on your mental state.Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
I hope :ermm:
nsfwQuote:
Originally Posted by mjmackythat rule doesn't apply to the reverse.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Spoiler: Show
That's not proper anime, and revisit the idea that rule doesn't apply in reverse.
It does if he says it backwards :yup:
It of porn is there, exists it if.Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
I think that's Yoda's response to, "what's your favorite fetish?".
My favorite porn fetish is watching it on fast forward, it's hilarious! :PQuote:
Originally Posted by mjmackyIt of porn is there, exists it if.Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
I think that's Yoda's response to, "what's your favorite fetish?".
Of course it works in reverse. I'll demonstrate how with the gift of words.
If rule 34 states pornography or sexually related material exists for any conceivable subject, then the existence of the subject is implied by the existence of its porn derivative.
I posted anime containing a naked redneck family fucking a horse, one implication thereof is that redneck anime exists.
You used too many words, you need too keep your sentences shorter and more concise to stop your audience from falling asleep. :blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
I've got Mary chastising me for not making long enough posts, and now you saying that they're too verbose.
Anyway, I've made a mental note: Mary can't get enough of my soliloquies and if you read more than three sentences, you get crotchety.
To Long; Didn't Read?
You're trying to get away with it. The rule only states that porn covers existing subject, but there is no exclusive requirement in said rule. That being, that you can have porn for things that don't exist. I'll submit an example.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
P.S. It was taking too long to find a decent porno (older mythologies just seemed too accessible), and I didn't want to do the Silverman thing, so I just made my own. How can this porno exist by your assumption?
Attachment 106579
I am not one to long for a read that is too long to read.Quote:
Originally Posted by Snee
Your point detracts from your stance :schnauz:Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmackyYou're trying to get away with it. The rule only states that porn covers existing subject, but there is no exclusive requirement in said rule. That being, that you can have porn for things that don't exist. I'll submit an example.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
P.S. It was taking too long to find a decent porno (older mythologies just seemed too accessible), and I didn't want to do the Silverman thing, so I just made my own. How can this porno exist by your assumption?
Attachment 106579
The rule I posted is the real and actual rule. The one you alluded to is the shorthand version for people who are hard of reading and/or thinking.