Printable View
what do you rekon right now at this very moment!!!!
...would be the latest greatest PC ever right now. e.g 4Gb processor (possible??), GeForce FX 6000 etc. (i no this isnt out yet but imagine) lol.
i want to see how good the technology is at this moment....
imagine getting a 100% in all the benchmark tests!
:o
sooo ......giv me some specs to make me drool over!!!!!!!!
Athlon FX-51 4ghzQuote:
Originally posted by dray_02@5 December 2003 - 07:18
what do you rekon right now at this very moment!!!!
...would be the latest greatest PC ever right now. e.g 4Gb processor (possible??), GeForce FX 6000 etc. (i no this isnt out yet but imagine) lol.
i want to see how good the technology is at this moment....
imagine getting a 100% in all the benchmark tests!
:o
sooo ......giv me some specs to make me drool over!!!!!!!!
ATI Radeon 11kXT (clocks: cpu=700mhz RAM=2.1ghz comes with 32xAFSAA and ASF)
Sound Blaster Audigy 3 with 48bit sound
dvd±r(w) 16x-10x-32x
8gb RAM pc10000 ddr2
1000watt psu from antec
two 720gb 10000rpm raptor drives
floppy drive (it wont disappear!)
EDIT! you sed imagine so i made up specs for the maximumPC dreamPC of 2004
:huh: :eek: wow that wud be good
I thin its still the earth simulater
http://www.top500.org/lists/2003/11/TOP500_Nov03.pdfQuote:
The Earth Simulator system was installed in the simulator building (with floor space 50m x 65m) at Yokohama Institute for Earth Sciences (Yokohama, Kanagawa) of JAMSTEC. This is the world?s fastest supercomputer configured with 640 nodes (64 Gflop/s per node, 5120 CPUs in total), each of which consists of eight vector processors (8 Gflop/s per CPU), and achieves the peak performance of 40 Tflop/s
just nned to win the lottery so I could host a really big lan party :w00t:
I love maximum PC! my new mag should be coming SOON..I want the next issue lol. I dont think the Dream Machine 2004 will quite have that good of stuff though. They never put that much RAM or that my HDD space lol.
You all guys have separate ideas of newly launched PC. How I wish I could change again my one year old machine.
16x burners will go on sale in a few months, Phillips are going to release them, so at least one part of your PC is already real.Quote:
Originally posted by atiVidia@5 December 2003 - 06:45
dvd±r(w) 16x-10x-32x
hey guys, go drool over this supercomputer.... B) here
you do realise that we will be laughingour asses off at this thread in a few years....hmm lets say 2006-2008
I should be safe for a few years 8^)
Quote:
Originally posted by muchspl2@5 December 2003 - 23:03
I should be safe for a few years 8^)
how come?Quote:
I should be safe for a few years 8^)
i think because he has a good computer
btw those mach 3.8s are OCed
Yeah they are, along with the 3.5's which just seems wrong to me for some reason. You really shouldnt be able to advertise 3.8Ghz, without having to say it is navitely a 3.0Ghz Chip.
now thats one super computer!!!!!!!!!Quote:
Originally posted by Mïcrösöül°V³@5 December 2003 - 21:21
hey guys, go drool over this supercomputer.... B) here
I wish i had that :( <_<
now thats one super computer!!!!!!!!!Quote:
Originally posted by Rizindon+6 December 2003 - 03:16--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Rizindon @ 6 December 2003 - 03:16)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Mïcrösöül°V³@5 December 2003 - 21:21
hey guys, go drool over this supercomputer.... B) here
I wish i had that :( <_< [/b][/quote]
over 27,000 no way
hey john lennon, if you werent dead for so long, youd see on that site down at the bottom where they tell you the native speeds, lol :stupid: its still all about the love, man :hug:Quote:
You really shouldnt be able to advertise 3.8Ghz, without having to say it is navitely a 3.0Ghz Chip
kool
The Machs look cool.
Really, though, I could care less about the box, but the monitors, those are too cool. Way to expensive though.
Lol it isnt just about the monitor and the box...Look on the inside...insane cooling and everythings overclocked....that thing is awesome..too damn much though lol..they do load on the stuff though.
i guess its safe to say that the mach's are a dream PC.
:lol:
sh :blink: it... cant believe it doesnt have a hard drive but a flash drive instead.
It has a hard drive..
Well, when I said the box, I meant the entire pc, cuz if you want to put some time and effort into it you could create a PC that was even better than that one, I’ve seen ppl who had P4's Oced to over 4ghz on overclocking sites, and had them staying stable.Quote:
Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@5 December 2003 - 21:55
Lol it isnt just about the monitor and the box...Look on the inside...insane cooling and everythings overclocked....that thing is awesome..too damn much though lol..they do load on the stuff though.
You can pick up a refrigeration unit for under 1000, and then the rest of the PC (I'd have to price everything) but I'd say as an estimate you could put together for another 5gs or so., It would take a little time and effort on the part of the person building it, but it would be way less than the price they are charging.
More satisfying that way too,
(guess I should mention I meant for like a mid-grade of their systems, cuz if you started adding ram drives and flash drives, it would start to get expensive, but just for their bottom system they want 4gs without the monitor. Example, they are basically charging around $1600 for just a P4 3.2 extreme edition, which you can buy for around $1000 retail.)
Anyway,
I just think it would be cool to have a monitor like that, I know you can do the exact same thing just by buying more than one monitor; and buying either a video card that supports more than one vga output; or just putting a PCI and AGP video card in your system, but It's just not the same. Those monitors are kickin'. If only I had a few thousands dollars to throw away, I'd pick one up.
did anyone notice the 8x dvd writer?
huh
:huh: wot r u huh'ing about? :huh:Quote:
Originally posted by Flash777@6 December 2003 - 11:28
huh
mach is using the 3.4 p4ee chipsQuote:
Originally posted by _John_Lennon_@5 December 2003 - 21:04
Yeah they are, along with the 3.5's which just seems wrong to me for some reason. You really shouldnt be able to advertise 3.8Ghz, without having to say it is navitely a 3.0Ghz Chip.
I dont think there are 3.4Ghz chips...stock
I'm fairly certian 3.2 is the last stock P4 right now.
wheres clocker shouldn't he be drooling over that cooling system
whats the difference between p4 CPUs and AMD CPUs? which is better?
MOD CLOSE THIS TOPIC NOW! god i dont wana get into it again lol. If you have a lot of money then...Intel is the best. Statisticly intel is better OK! Amd is MUCH cheaper though (at least on there non top of the line...chips) Amd 2500 for $90 looks about the same as a P4 2.4 Ghz which is like $150.
the easiest way to not "get into it again" would be not to post :)Quote:
Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@6 December 2003 - 22:51
god i dont wana get into it again lol.
true i guess lol
think ull find that the amd 64 bit processors are currently the most expensive and are currently the best performing on the market...not the intels
I duno...I wouldnt buy the athlon 64s though, there too new and way to high.
agree with you on that but they are the best performing processor between the amd's and the intels on a desktop pc
I duno..i still think the EE beat the athlon 64..but o well..well call it even lol I like the 2500XP newayz
until intel bring out a 64bit cpu then they dont really have a cpu yet to match it performance wise but I wouldnt touch them at the moment cos theyre too new as u said and theyll be getting updated very shortly so the mobos u buy just now will mean u cant upgrade when they r changed.....the bartons are a good processor (i have one myself) simply cos they r cheap and oc well plus they handle everythin u throw at it just now