Printable View
I was just wondering if ther were any PS2 or Xbox emulators out there? :P
- im guessing that there isnt, because of the sophistication involved in creating such an emulator.
:01:
and before you state " try searching"
... i already did, i just wanted to see if ther was any progress since then
results on the search engine
if they even do you need probally like an alienware to play it or something <_<Quote:
Originally posted by dray_02@9 January 2004 - 06:59
I was just wondering if ther were any PS2 or Xbox emulators out there? :P
- im guessing that there isnt, because of the sophistication involved in creating such an emulator.
:01:
if they even do you need probally like an alienware to play it or something <_< [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by Monkeee+9 January 2004 - 07:02--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Monkeee @ 9 January 2004 - 07:02)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-dray_02@9 January 2004 - 06:59
I was just wondering if ther were any PS2 or Xbox emulators out there? :P
- im guessing that there isnt, because of the sophistication involved in creating such an emulator.
:01:
lol, r u serious?
surely PS2 and Xbox consoles cant be that high tech. can they? why would we need beasty machines?
In terms of computer specs could sum1 tell me the specs of a PS2 and Xbox.
e.g P4 2 gz
gf 4 mx 440
lol jk :lol: ;) (i think :smilie4: )
uhh you do need a pretty high end machine to run ps2 or xbox emulator...consoles are made solely for gaming so it runs it fine
emulation requires a lot of overhead-- it is usually a huge waste of power, so the machine running the emulator needs to be significantly faster than the one it's emulating, to make up for the waste.Quote:
Originally posted by dray_02@8 January 2004 - 23:11
surely PS2 and Xbox consoles cant be that high tech. can they? why would we need beasty machines?
oh ok :huh:
emulation requires a lot of overhead-- it is usually a huge waste of power, so the machine running the emulator needs to be significantly faster than the one it's emulating, to make up for the waste. [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by 3RA1N1AC+9 January 2004 - 08:38--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (3RA1N1AC @ 9 January 2004 - 08:38)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-dray_02@8 January 2004 - 23:11
surely PS2 and Xbox consoles cant be that high tech. can they? why would we need beasty machines?
Indeed! even GBA emulators need decent(ish) computers to run properly and look at the specs of a GBA!
Indeed! even GBA emulators need decent(ish) computers to run properly and look at the specs of a GBA! [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by Gooch2k+10 January 2004 - 12:03--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Gooch2k @ 10 January 2004 - 12:03)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Quote:
Originally posted by 3RA1N1AC@9 January 2004 - 08:38
<!--QuoteBegin-dray_02
Quote:
@8 January 2004 - 23:11
surely PS2 and Xbox consoles cant be that high tech. can they? why would we need beasty machines?
emulation requires a lot of overhead-- it is usually a huge waste of power, so the machine running the emulator needs to be significantly faster than the one it's emulating, to make up for the waste.
Very true....thats why they say for example you will never see either a Dreamcast/PS2 or Gamecube emulator for the Xbox..because games for these consoles have so much coding in them and written specifically for that console that the Xbox would pretty much cough & splutter when trying to re-interpret the code and play the game....if it was maybe half a dozen times faster than it is now you might be in with a shot.........as for Xbox emulators for the PC, there is only one at the moment 'Xenium' and the only game that runs is Halo :blink: may as well buy the PC version :lol: :lol:
PS2:
http://www.e-lation.net/site/img/history_sys/ps2.gif
CPU
CPU: Toshiba, Sony
Typ: Emotion Engine
Takt: 295 MHz
Graphic engine:
Sony
Graphics Synthesizer
147 MHz
Memory
36 M
RambusDRAM
400 MHz
Graphic
640x480 - 1280x1024
Pixel: 64 Bit
Pixel/Sec: 1,2 G/s
Sound
Channels: 48+ ADPCM
Dolby Surround, Dolby Digital, DTS
Procesor: SPU
-----------
X-Box:
http://www.e-lation.net/site/img/history_sys/xbox.gif
CPU
Intel
Pentium III
733 MHz
Graphic engine:
nVidia
XGPU
233 MHz
Memory:
64 M
DDR-SRAM
200 MHz
Graphic:
720x560
Pixel: 32 Bit
Pixel/Sec: 3,7 G/s
Sound
Channels: 256
Dolby Digital 5.1
Processor: APU
--------
Source: e-lation.net
Visit e-lation.net for more specs and emulation stuff B)
--------
PCSX2 [v0.5] is the best avaible PS2 emulator you still can't play comercial PS2 games on your PC with it.But I belive that the guys who are devolping PCSX2, will release a working PS2 emulator (someday ...) :rolleyes:
Hey, I thought that Xbox'es has Celeron processors, not P3s??
As you can see, it's an Intel Pentium 3 (733 MHz) :D and I think the x-box has a 80GB HDD :huh:
B) B) B)
I've heard in quite a few places that they contain 733 Celerons.Quote:
Originally posted by Dark Ride@10 January 2004 - 13:24
As you can see, it's an Intel Pentium 3 (733 MHz) :D and I think the x-box has a 80GB HDD :huh:
B) B) B)
They have 8gb hard drives don't they ?