but is there enough to keep him out of the white house for another term?
Printable View
but is there enough to keep him out of the white house for another term?
depends if he allows ALL votes to be counted or if he does a "Mugabe" :lol:
well with all of the democrats running its hard to say if its possible for any of them to beat him
That's what primaries are for Rapfan.Quote:
Originally posted by RapFan@24 January 2004 - 00:34
well with all of the democrats running its hard to say if its possible for any of them to beat him
btw I don't like Bush either <_<
I'm gonna laugh if he doesn't get reelected cause nothing will change regardless weather a Repub or Dem is elected.
i donno when bush got elected many things changed sadly they were negitive changes
Funny-
Another Presidential election coming fast, and no one has even taken the time to properly suss the events in Florida from 2000.
You all unquestioningly bought the party line, huh?
Oh, well-
I'm not gonna go through all that again. ;)
Site about the people running
there are just too many
Let's all focus on the negative now. That's the best thing to do. Not that we should focus on the economy coming back strong, or the capture/kill of 2/3's of the Al Aqaida Network which also fucking attacked us in 1993 when Blowjob Clinton didn't do anything about it, or the capture of a murderous dictator. Let's just focus on the what the liberal media tells us!
Tsk TskQuote:
Originally posted by E-squirrel@25 January 2004 - 17:28
Let's all focus on the negative now. That's the best thing to do. Not that we should focus on the economy coming back strong, or the capture/kill of 2/3's of the Al Aqaida Network which also fucking attacked us in 1993 when Blowjob Clinton didn't do anything about it, or the capture of a murderous dictator. Let's just focus on the what the liberal media tells us!
That is no way to present a left wing view point. You have to present reasoned arguments on why we should focus on the liberal media. :D
What happened in Florida happens in every state, for some reason Gores guys thought Florida would yield the electoral votes needed but it wasn't an isolated incident they just happen to shine the spot light on it.Quote:
Originally posted by j2k4@24 January 2004 - 17:16
Funny-
Another Presidential election coming fast, and no one has even taken the time to properly suss the events in Florida from 2000.
You all unquestioningly bought the party line, huh?
Oh, well-
I'm not gonna go through all that again. ;)
What happened in Florida happens in every state, for some reason Gores guys thought Florida would yield the electoral votes needed but it wasn't an isolated incident they just happen to shine the spot light on it. [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by <TROUBLE^MAKER>+25 January 2004 - 16:50--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (<TROUBLE^MAKER> @ 25 January 2004 - 16:50)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-j2k4@24 January 2004 - 17:16
Funny-
Another Presidential election coming fast, and no one has even taken the time to properly suss the events in Florida from 2000.
You all unquestioningly bought the party line, huh?
Oh, well-
I'm not gonna go through all that again. ;)
Quite right.
I have enumerated the facts here many times, along with a delightfully humorous selection of anecdotal antics on the part of the Dems, but to no avail, hence my refusal to take up the gauntlet again. ;)
While I believe most American do hate Bush, that doesn't matter.
It matters whether those same people bother to vote. <_<
Should voters be "means tested"?Quote:
Originally posted by Busyman@25 January 2004 - 19:32
While I believe most American do hate Bush, that doesn't matter.
It matters whether those same people bother to vote. <_<
I thought, for the longest time, that voter apathy would be the downfall of the Republic; now I fear the opposite could be true.
I had a discussion a while back with someone who professed agreement with everything I said.
Turned out he was just ignorant. ;)
Should voters be "means tested"?Quote:
Originally posted by j2k4+26 January 2004 - 00:43--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (j2k4 @ 26 January 2004 - 00:43)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Busyman@25 January 2004 - 19:32
While I believe most American do hate Bush, that doesn't matter.
It matters whether those same people bother to vote. <_<
I thought, for the longest time, that voter apathy would be the downfall of the Republic; now I fear the opposite could be true.
I had a discussion a while back with someone who professed agreement with everything I said.
Turned out he was just ignorant. ;) [/b][/quote]
Not quite sure to what you're referring. Maybe the discussion with ilw?
I don't think voters should be tested; just fucking vote!!! <_<
When you vote it makes politicians listen to you particular groups problems.
If you do not then you don't make or break them getting into office so you are off their radar.
Busyman-
I am referring to the uninformed voter-a dangerous creature, to be sure.
Guess what?
I get to go play pool now!
Later, gator. ;)
what exactly do all you have against bush??
1. his tax cuts are working
2. he freed 2 countries in 1 term
3. he tells it like it is unlike the democrats ::cough:: treason lobby ::cough::
I never disputed his tax cuts aren't working. They work for the rich. He himself said his tax cut were for big business to spur new employment. Well big business did get the tax cut......with very little new employment.Quote:
Originally posted by nsane@26 January 2004 - 04:44
what exactly do all you have against bush??
1. his tax cuts are working
2. he freed 2 countries in 1 term
3. he tells it like it is unlike the democrats ::cough:: treason lobby ::cough::
So I guess you're right.http://www.gamespy.com/avatars/av/AT/at461.gif
Hmm the government cut my taxes...what should i do?
a). pocket the money and have the new pool installed
B). better returns for company investors
c). employ more people as i didn't have enough staff as it was
I know which i would be inclined to do if my company was large enough
the tax cut saved everyone the same % of money, it's just that rich ppl have more money so they get more money backQuote:
Originally posted by Busyman@25 January 2004 - 22:41
I never disputed his tax cuts aren't working. They work for the rich. He himself said his tax cut were for big business to spur new employment. Well big business did get the tax cut......with very little new employment.
So I guess you're right.http://www.gamespy.com/avatars/av/AT/at461.gif
10% of $10000 is $1000
10% of $1000000 is $100000
see the more you have the more you get back, it's just that the democrats wanna make look like u did to ppl that can't put 2 & 2 together
the tax cut saved everyone the same % of money, it's just that rich ppl have more money so they get more money backQuote:
Originally posted by nsane+26 January 2004 - 11:50--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (nsane @ 26 January 2004 - 11:50)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Busyman@25 January 2004 - 22:41
I never disputed his tax cuts aren't working. They work for the rich. He himself said his tax cut were for big business to spur new employment. Well big business did get the tax cut......with very little new employment.
So I guess you're right.http://www.gamespy.com/avatars/av/AT/at461.gif
10% of $10000 is $1000
10% of $1000000 is $100000
see the more you have the more you get back, it's just that the democrats wanna make look like u did to ppl that can't put 2 & 2 together [/b][/quote]
Aww no shit Sherlock....
but there's different types of tax cuts. Please read up on that and come back to us.
(ever heard of tax brackets?)