We all know that pornography is restriced to 18+. But why? Do you think that porn must be free access?
This is a poll request from superdude
BOT
Printable View
We all know that pornography is restriced to 18+. But why? Do you think that porn must be free access?
This is a poll request from superdude
BOT
http://www.nylon.net/brainburger/tongue.jpg YEAHHHHH! :P
Yes. Porn has kept me from having sex before I'm ready.
Actually, I'm hornier than ever now :blink:
uhh... porn is good! :01:
Define porn.
Seriously.
Under 18's have to be protected from predators. Even more so with the proliferation of internet access. Keep it as it is and make an extra effort to track down and kill paedophiles.
porn is free for all :D
Porn makes everything better.
And being glib helps, too, I suppose. <_<Quote:
Originally posted by pusher@3 February 2004 - 04:04
Porn makes everything better.
It does doesn't it? :)Quote:
Originally posted by j2k4@3 February 2004 - 08:07
And being glib helps, too, I suppose. <_<
in my opinion anyone younger then 17 that has sex is just fucked up ;)
thats why kids need porn so they can wank off and not have sex :D
most porn good
some porn bad
http://www.itgamers.net/trix/kitty.swf
imo porn should be for 14+ :lol:
I think that any nudity should be available in a separate section. The reason I say this is that we have young members in this forum who are watching the forum, sometimes in the company of adults. Sometimes in the family living room. Actually the more I think about it, it also applies to grown ups. On a couple of occasions I went to show someone something on the forum. In order to do so I had to display an array of topless women. What kind of impresion does that give to strangers watching the forum. What do they think of me continually on the forum.
The main reason I am against it was the other night during the superbowl. When we had a young American lad watching the superbowl with his family and also logged on to the forum. He must have been embarassed to be shown a display of topless women in a thread about the superbowl. He did complain, and rightly so, at the time. OK someone is going to come back and mention the Jackson incident. That was an accident, I hope. :)
I voted 18+ but that is not really accurate for me.
Explicit porn should be located in separate areas. Basic nudity should be available anywhere. Children should not be taught that nudity in itself is wrong.
TD
:P I did not vote.
No answer fits me.
Put a kid of let's say 14familiar with a computer behind it and odds are he has
seen it all. And i mean all.
Regulation is good, if it actually works. It doesn't.
And it won't get any better.
So only way of "damagecontrol" is education on sexual values.
By parents(if available), at school, etc.
Because what they will "learn" from porn is not real life.
To be honest i'm even more concerned about some "shows" we have on public
channels here, like sexcourt.
Most of those programs are way more sexist than most Pr0nflicks.
And every kid with a tv in it's room can watch them.........
Okay, no real "beavershots", but having a girl suck a ten inch dildo on public
tv...........
Most who know me, know i have nothing against porn for myself.
But i think i have a clear picture not to expect most of it in real life(though
admitted, i'm quite happy in that department.).
But it's not just kids that are a risc building wrong values.
I think also a lot of "adults" could use a course on sexual values before they
indulge in p0rn..........
Yogi
Pornography, yes, for 18 and older. It obviously can not be regulated on the internet, some things just can't be. Example P2P filesharing. LOL. But where and when it can it should be. I find it is espically disturbing if someone is exposed to it who dosn't want to be. It should be availible to only those who want it.
To a certain extent yes it's natural.. but most "porn" these days seems to be pushing the limits of whats natural and whats just outright wrong. It just becomes a question of morals and values, and at 18, I think you can make that decison on your own.
-Steven
Anybody should be able to look at porn but you should have to 18+ to do porn.
Absolutely. And I'll bet those who commented that porn should be available for all don't have children who one day may fall prey to demon pedophiles. I would murder any pedophile who touched my children in the most painful way imaginable.Quote:
Originally posted by Billy_Dean@3 February 2004 - 16:13
Under 18's have to be protected from predators. Even more so with the proliferation of internet access. Keep it as it is and make an extra effort to track down and kill paedophiles.
........................... <_<
;) Restricting porn to 18 and older is a stupid thing and it wont work. If the kid knows where to go he can find porn quite easily.(*cough* Kazaa *cough*)
And I don't give a fuck about moral corrpution. I'm more moral then most of these hypocrital motherfuckers in the world. :angel2:
Absolutely. And I'll bet those who commented that porn should be available for all don't have children who one day may fall prey to demon pedophiles. I would murder any pedophile who touched my children in the most painful way imaginable. [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by Ella+3 February 2004 - 13:15--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Ella @ 3 February 2004 - 13:15)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Billy_Dean@3 February 2004 - 16:13
Under 18's have to be protected from predators. Even more so with the proliferation of internet access. Keep it as it is and make an extra effort to track down and kill paedophiles.
I actually get scared by those comments. And that's mildly put........
And i honestly don't see the link here, in this topic, to peadophiles.......... :huh:
Yogi
I voted 18+ altho thats not strictly true of the way I feel.
I think 18 is probably too high nowadays, I mean for gods sake, I challenge any of you mothers/fathers out there who have a son of 13 plus to turn his bedroom upside down, I garuantee you will find at least a mag.
What harm does it do?
The problem being that it should be controled, properly created.
By companies such as Private.
They also educated to an extent, maybe not so much on saftey altho some do stress the use of protection. But education in sexual pleasure.
If they are interested in sex, nothings going to stop them.
I remember at school (about 12) being told that real life sex is nothing like the porn films, by this age I had seen a couple :rolleyes:
And too this day I think our teacher was very wrong in saying that.
Ok so the old plummer and Private Eye storylines of the 70's were a bit much, but that all went, the sex is how sex is and should be. Hot steamy and fun :)
So.........I find it hard to put an age on this, I'd say a normal man/woman /m/m w/w film should be 15.
Mags should be 15.
Harder material dealing in specific sexuality and acts such as bondage should be 18, for saftey reasons.
And so speaks your resident pervert :lol: :lol:
Jonno B)
Now that's a big OOPS!!!Quote:
The problem being that it should be controled, properly created.
By companies such as Private.
Private 's way of "creating" is sooo sickening.
Ever seen a documentary on their way of producing???
Disgusting......
And the output is porn without any emotion or creativity. Not my cup of tea.........
Yogi
Go ahead, Yogs. I'm stating an opinion. I can't control how you feel about it, mate. Sorry, but it's something I feel pretty strongly over.Quote:
Originally posted by SensualGardening@3 February 2004 - 20:33
I actually get scared by those comments. And that's mildly put........
Some of the reasons to keep it 18 are 1. This is the age of ID's, you can't issue a kid of 15 ID to buy porn mags. 2. At 18 you are legally an adult, free to choose. 3. If the age were lowered, you'd get young girls being lured into the sex industry when they are at too yound and too impressionable an age.
However mature you 14 and 15 year olds think you are, you're wrong. A scheming adult would take you apart. A sexual predator would eat you. You need protecting until such times as you are able to look after yourselves.
You have to draw the line somewhere, that should be at adulthood. l want my kids, and other's kids protected. Your 15 year old son having a Playboy under his pillow is not the issue here.
You can look without doing anything...Quote:
Originally posted by Billy_Dean@3 February 2004 - 11:39
Some of the reasons to keep it 18 are 1. This is the age of ID's, you can't issue a kid of 15 ID to buy porn mags. 2. At 18 you are legally an adult, free to choose. 3. If the age were lowered, you'd get young girls being lured into the sex industry when they are at too yound and too impressionable an age.
However mature you 14 and 15 year olds think you are, you're wrong. A scheming adult would take you apart. A sexual predator would eat you. You need protecting until such times as you are able to look after yourselves.
You have to draw the line somewhere, that should be at adulthood. l want my kids, and other's kids protected. Your 15 year old son having a Playboy under his pillow is not the issue here.
pron for all - only because i'm not 18 till June
Go ahead, Yogs. I'm stating an opinion. I can't control how you feel about it, mate. Sorry, but it's something I feel pretty strongly over. [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by Ella+3 February 2004 - 14:37--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Ella @ 3 February 2004 - 14:37)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-SensualGardening@3 February 2004 - 20:33
I actually get scared by those comments. And that's mildly put........
Though they weren't my biological kids, i would be a serialkiller now if i did kill all
involved in screwing up their life........
But the stories i heard from my fosterkids............And in the varios institutions i
worked.............
And that's not "just" sexual abuse....., but also mental!!!
The way i look at it, i'm more concerned with neglecting and abusive parents,
than with the few sick people in this world, called peadophiles........(most of them
being victims becoming offenders.....)
As i don't have kids of my own, i can't talk from that perspective, but i can imagine
feelings as you describe, hey maybe i would even act that way, given the
circumstances..... I just would never promote them, like for instance BD.....
Killing vermin never helps, it just gives you a false impression of justice....
So basically it would be a selfish act, giving your kid the impression killing actually
solves problems.......
And there you have the circle people don't seem to get out.........
Yogi
free for everyone
what difference does it make if your 17 and 364 days year old at 11:59 pm???
does it mean that in 1 minute time you have all of a sudden become good enough for porn ?
blah
You have to draw a line, try getting in a pub the day before your 18th birthday. 364, 363, 362, 361, where does it stop?
I actually meant it's done safely, most of the Private stars use condoms, they are all clean and ALL over 21.Quote:
Originally posted by SensualGardening@3 February 2004 - 12:33
Now that's a big OOPS!!!
Private 's way of "creating" is sooo sickening.
Ever seen a documentary on their way of producing???
Disgusting......
No porn is meaningful, it designed to arouse, not be romantic :rolleyes:
Why is'nt it?? It's porn!Quote:
Your 15 year old son having a Playboy under his pillow is not the issue here.
Come on you guys, how many of saw a porn movie before you were 18...........before you were 15?.........I did, do I got out hurting people? No, I'm in a sturdy relationship and have been for 14 years.
Pedophiles will be around whether there's porn or not and no law is going to stop them. It's trajic but true.
This is a sick world. Full of a lot of sick things and people.
But to say porn is bad is no different from saying the internet is bad.
Most of these incidents happen now because of chat rooms.
Pedophiles have increased in number dramatically since the age of the internet.
Jonno B)
Not true. Over 18 that is and wearing condoms is nice if you also treat people with respect.Quote:
I actually meant it's done safely, most of the Private stars use condoms, they are all clean and ALL over 21.
I never mentioned romance.Quote:
No porn is meaningful, it designed to arouse, not be romantic
But only try to listen to 1 private-flick.........
Any idea why 90% of the private girls come from east-europe???
Nowhere you get the impression the girls actually have fun.........
And, yes, there 's a lot of pOrn where that is the case, at least where you get the
idea the girls have some say in what happens........ and in some cases really have
fun...
Yogi
Yogi
Yogi dude , I've seen many documantaries on porn makers, Private is one of the most respected in the business :)
Laura Angel, Kata Lynn, Cassandra Wild, Dolly Buster , Sylvia Saint , Tonisha Mills!
To name but a few all make shit loads of money and love doing it.
They come from all over, admitedly mostly Germany, but some from the US and various other places.
My point is, it's properly produced :)
And I had a thought, it's legal in this country to have sex, Straight or gay , 2 years before you can buy porn.
THAT makes no sense!
Jonno B)
Okay, i leave it at that.Quote:
Originally posted by JONNO_CELEBS@3 February 2004 - 16:03
Yogi dude , I've seen many documantaries on porn makers, Private is one of the most respected in the business :)
Laura Angel, Kata Lynn, Cassandra Wild, Dolly Buster , Sylvia Saint , Tonisha Mills!
To name but a few all make shit loads of money and love doing it.
They come from all over, admitedly mostly Germany, but some from the US and various other places.
My point is, it's properly produced :)
And I had a thought, it's legal in this country to have sex, Straight or gay , 2 years before you can buy porn.
THAT makes no sense!
Jonno B)
You obviously have a different view.
But take a look at Pierre Woodman's so called "Audition's" and you get my drift....
And, oh, most doc's on pr0n are made by.........pr0ncompany's!!!
Yogi
Ok me and you is not gonna argue dude :hug: (get ya hand off me butt :lol: )
I will just say that the docs I've seen were exploiting Porn companies, showing all their bad sides, really quite disturbing, but the interviews were very interesting :)
We's cool Brah :hug:
You and me know waaaaay too much about porn :lol: :lol:
Jonno B)
The votes are tied.
Quote:
Originally posted by JONNO_CELEBS@3 February 2004 - 16:14
Y' right!!Quote:
Ok me and you is not gonna argue dude :hug: (get ya hand off me butt :lol: )
But i will argue about that hand!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:
WTF???Quote:
We's cool Brah :hug:
We are Hot!!!! :lol: :lol:
Talk for yourself!!! :lol:Quote:
You and me know waaaaay too much about porn :lol: :lol:
It's a lifelong study!!! :P B) ;) :">
:wub:
Yogi
[/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by SensualGardening+3 February 2004 - 14:20--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (SensualGardening @ 3 February 2004 - 14:20)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-JONNO_CELEBS@3 February 2004 - 16:14
:lol: :lol:
:ph34r: What was it then? :PQuote:
Y' right!!
But i will argue about that hand!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:
No, at the mo I'm cold :ph34r: But Hot too :01: B)Quote:
WTF???
We are Hot!!!! :lol:
I stopped watching porn.........oh must have been..........a couple of hours ago :lol: :lol:Quote:
Talk for yourself!!! :lol:
It's a lifelong study!!! :P B) ;) :">
Jonno B)
:lol: :lol: :lol:Quote:
stopped watching porn.........oh must have been..........a couple of hours ago
I know the feeling!!
I stop everyday!!!
:P Yogi
Same as I give up smoking ever hour or so :lol:
Jonno B)