Quote:
Originally posted by Jibbler@17 February 2004 - 18:16
This discussion has moved way beyond sound quality. 320? Too damn big, and tests have proven that lossless compression can be achieved at much smaller bitrate/filesize.
The ripkit was designed to keep things uniform among the rippers, and each rip comes with an nfo that shows ripping notes, details... an .sfv file to verify that there were no corrupt files created during ftp xfer... an m3u file to make playing/burning a full cd easy... we add coverscans, which most major ripping groups DON'T include.. why? cause they are lazy.. and our rips conform to scene standard which is --alt-preset standard VBR using tried, tested, and proven ripper/encoder matching of EAC/Lame. This 'scene standard' was created by audiofiles and computer geeks who thru there own time/testing/contribution, were able to determine a system acceptable for creating music even YOUR ears will satisfy.
The rip kit really shouldn't be discussed on such a 'public' forum. Users looking to properly share high quality rips of thier music are welcome to contribute and possibly rip for us. However, we are an internal group that does this purely for the fun of the scene, so we are not recruiting new members. However, if you can contribute something to the cause............ :music1:
The new Ripping Scene standard is --alt-preset standard VBR using tried, tested, and proven ripper/encoder matching of EAC/Lame. This 'scene standard' was created by audiofiles and computer geeks who thru there own time/testing/contribution, were able to determine a system acceptable for creating music to satisfy the ears of anyone.