Theshad0w's Client S-5.8.10

Printable View

02-17-2004, 11:54 PM
{I}{K}{E}

WHAT'S NEW:

nasty bug fixed
new client code makes it easier on trackers
new tracker code
NOTE: Corrupted downloads may be caused
by bad RAM in your computer!
try running the tool from memtest86.com to check
(and yes, the client includes enhancements
from official v.3.3)

Download
02-18-2004, 07:38 AM
dragon_son

corupted downloads could also be cause by you settings make sure you set them up right or it will corupt 70% of the time

now that i know what my problem was back to shados versions they like me better than other clients
02-18-2004, 08:08 AM
CPU1

shadows has gone down these past few months. its all about azureues now
02-18-2004, 10:11 AM
Java Boy

I have to agree CPU
02-18-2004, 12:27 PM
p2pmaster

Quote:

  shadows has gone down these past few months. its all about azureues now

yes i agree B)
02-18-2004, 12:43 PM
NotoriousBIC

Quote:

Originally posted by {I}{K}{E}@17 February 2004 - 23:54
NOTE: Corrupted downloads may be caused
by bad RAM in your computer!

Isn't that something other programs handle just fine?
02-18-2004, 12:55 PM
dragon_son

gahh i hate azrus it uses way to much system resources abc and shadows all the way
02-18-2004, 06:33 PM
Java Boy

Azureus is definitely not for low spec computers B)
02-19-2004, 12:23 PM
dragon_son

2.4 GHz 800Mhz fsb Intel
1.5 gigs of ddr 3200ram mushkin
Geforce 4600 128megs Nvidia
soundblaster live 5.1 gamer edition Creative
48x24x48 CDRW Liteon
16X DVD BenQ
DFI LanParty PRO857 DFI

umm i dont think thats what i would call low specs

I just find that i get better faster more stable downloads from abc and shadows than azrus. I could almost never get it to go above 50KBs with azrus, while i regularly get it to 200 with abc or shadows.

And so faf outta ALL the clients that i have tested ABC is the least system intensive from what i have seen anyways, and azrus if the most system intensive from what i have seen.

i didnt like azrus using 120,000k mem according to win taskmanager though i will admit it dose have some features that other clients lack i wont be making the jump to azrus anytime soon
02-19-2004, 03:10 PM
NotoriousBIC

I'm still baffled by these problems with Azureus' resource use.

I have lower specs than you dragon_son, but Azureus goes nowhere near that CPU/Mem usage your saying.
It's currently at 2,800 K mem usage and peaking 3% CPU usage and I'm currently downloading/seeding 5 torrents...

Have you installed the correct Java runtime environment?
02-19-2004, 03:20 PM
j4y3m

Mine uses about 20,000k.
02-23-2004, 02:47 PM
{I}{K}{E}

new build released !
02-23-2004, 09:02 PM
mr. nails

Quote:

Originally posted by {I}{K}{E}@17 February 2004 - 17:54
WHAT'S NEW:

nasty bug fixed
new client code makes it easier on trackers
new tracker code
NOTE: Corrupted downloads may be caused
by bad RAM in your computer!
try running the tool from memtest86.com to check
(and yes, the client includes enhancements
from official v.3.3)

Download

that's what's always new. wish he could be more specific. i have NEVER seen or noticed a difference with dl'ing, interface, compatiblity, or anything...