Printable View
These are just photgraphs of the screen but still :o
Image Resized
[img]http://mysite.freeserve.com/smallsheep/Unreal_Engine2.jpg' width='200' height='120' border='0' alt='click for full size view'>
Image Resized
[img]http://mysite.freeserve.com/smallsheep/Unreal_Engine1.jpg' width='200' height='120' border='0' alt='click for full size view'>
:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o
Wow.
.... Wow.
Wow.
Looks good, but will see when it gets here,
:o these are fantastic i can't wait to see the finished product something i can't wait for now !!
If Trigens made you jump, imagine one of these running screaming at you from the dark, or jumping from a vent . :D
Heh, you thought they looked good stationary? How about moving? Recording of an Unreal Demo.......prepare to have your mind blown, all rendered real time. ;)
Check the bump mapping and pixel shading on the wall, the lighting effects and most of all the sheer detail on the model, all with a relativley low polygon count, just heavily detailed and bumpmapped, meaning relativley good framerates :o.
12MB wmv.
http://www.hanners.nildram.co.uk/unreal3_0002.wmv
(Save target as)
Another mirror incase that one goes down:
http://www.testeagles.net/ady/nv40/unreal3_0002.wmv
Needless to say, I am mindblown ;).
Do you think we could expect these sorts of graphics on the NextGen consoles???
Or is that asking tooooo much???
Its possible, the Xbox 2 is rumoured to have a next generation GFX card. But PC's will always be one step ahead ;).Quote:
Originally posted by slimboyfatz@14 April 2004 - 15:02
Do you think we could expect these sorts of graphics on the NextGen consoles???
Or is that asking tooooo much???
Shame both mirrors are down...
http://sanbjoe.home.online.no/nv40/unreal3_0002.wmv
This one should stay up for a couple of hours. :)
omg...Quote:
Originally posted by RGX@14 April 2004 - 08:47
These are just photgraphs of the screen but still :o
Image Resized
Image Resized
[img]http://mysite.freeserve.com/smallsheep/Unreal_Engine2.jpg' width='200' height='120' border='0' alt='click for full size view'>
Image Resized
Image Resized
[img]http://mysite.freeserve.com/smallsheep/Unreal_Engine1.jpg' width='200' height='120' border='0' alt='click for full size view'>
:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o
:o
*speechless*
thoes look like action figures
they look like movie cgi. wow! :o :o :o i wonder wat kind of beast we'll need to play that game
The developers have been quoted as saying....Quote:
Originally posted by abu_has_the_power@14 April 2004 - 22:19
they look like movie cgi. wow! :o :o :o i wonder wat kind of beast we'll need to play that game
'Even though the character models are highly detailed, they do not require a large amount of polygons..so may run at full speed on an Intel Celeron 333mhz with a GeforceMX2'*
* :blink: :blink: :blink: Ummm Yeah right!!!!! :lol: :lol:
The developers have been quoted as saying....Quote:
Originally posted by slimboyfatz+14 April 2004 - 18:57--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (slimboyfatz @ 14 April 2004 - 18:57)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-abu_has_the_power@14 April 2004 - 22:19
they look like movie cgi. wow! :o :o :o i wonder wat kind of beast we'll need to play that game
'Even though the character models are highly detailed, they do not require a large amount of polygons..so may run at full speed on an Intel Celeron 333mhz with a GeforceMX2'*
* :blink: :blink: :blink: Ummm Yeah right!!!!! :lol: :lol: [/b][/quote]
Where'd ypu hear that? In the video, they said they were originally running it at 2-5 FPS, and that the NVidia 6800 was the only card capable of achieving decent framerates. In the vide, looked at some points it was 20-30 FPS. No way my system could run that.
The developers have been quoted as saying....Quote:
Originally posted by slimboyfatz+14 April 2004 - 15:57--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (slimboyfatz @ 14 April 2004 - 15:57)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-abu_has_the_power@14 April 2004 - 22:19
they look like movie cgi. wow! :o :o :o i wonder wat kind of beast we'll need to play that game
'Even though the character models are highly detailed, they do not require a large amount of polygons..so may run at full speed on an Intel Celeron 333mhz with a GeforceMX2'*
* :blink: :blink: :blink: Ummm Yeah right!!!!! :lol: :lol: [/b][/quote]
Yeah right, it seems to be true. The devlopers for Riddick are using the same method. There using a medium render polygon characture and placing a high res skin over it, and making light reflect on objects that ar 2d to make them look 3d.
It really seems like it can work and use less resources doing so.
Yeah right, it seems to be true. The devlopers for Riddick are using the same method. There using a medium render polygon characture and placing a high res skin over it, and making light reflect on objects that ar 2d to make them look 3d.Quote:
Originally posted by Agent Smith+14 April 2004 - 19:08--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Agent Smith @ 14 April 2004 - 19:08)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Quote:
Originally posted by slimboyfatz@14 April 2004 - 15:57
<!--QuoteBegin-abu_has_the_power
Quote:
@14 April 2004 - 22:19
they look like movie cgi. wow! :o :o :o i wonder wat kind of beast we'll need to play that game
The developers have been quoted as saying....
'Even though the character models are highly detailed, they do not require a large amount of polygons..so may run at full speed on an Intel Celeron 333mhz with a GeforceMX2'*
* :blink: :blink: :blink: Ummm Yeah right!!!!! :lol: :lol:
It really seems like it can work and use less resources doing so. [/b][/quote]
they have to, or else no one would be able to play their games, unless they have a $1000 video card
speechless, i'm ashamed that ID can't come up wit something better (maybe they will.........................in like 20 years :lol: )
if doom3 took this long to make, i wonder how long the next technological advancement in games are gonna come, oh wait, it's gonna be unreal 3 :D
those pictures are fckin amazing! looks like something on a movie, a like it. and i hope it works on a 333mhz celeron, that means ill be able to lan with my dads computer and my old computer in my sis's room :)...that'd be cool.
downloading the video file right now, hope its as mind-blowing as the pics :D
halo 2 looks a lot better :) :01:
have to agree with rossco there... the photos look awesome...
c'mon download.... :angry: hurry up... 53% :angry: i wanna see this :ghostface:
shoot yourselfQuote:
Originally posted by gungrave@15 April 2004 - 03:46
halo 2 looks a lot better :) :01:
Halo 2 doesn't even touch this, and its on x-box do i need to say anymore?!?
Gamecube dominates it!
i wouldnt say that joey....
anyhoo i just watched the vid.. its looking fucking amazing...
does any1 have a spare geforce 6800 (was is???) lying around that i could have?.
:music1:
and why shouldn't i say that <_<
says halo 2 is better pfft
RGX = the image in your video is upside down according to BSplayer. Videolan, on the other hand, seems to not want to show any image output :ph34r:
say wat u want <_<Quote:
Originally posted by joeyipod@15 April 2004 - 17:30
and why shouldn't i say that <_<
says halo 2 is better pfft
:box:
:o looks great but the guy talking in the video sounds like a megafag
wow!!!!!!!!!!!!
looks so real!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :lol: :blink:
UNREAL
shoot yourselfQuote:
Originally posted by joeyipod+14 April 2004 - 22:24--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (joeyipod @ 14 April 2004 - 22:24)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-gungrave@15 April 2004 - 03:46
halo 2 looks a lot better :) :01:
[/b][/quote]
i dont mind doing it for him. :01: :smilie4:
don't get me wrong i'm sure halo 2 will be good but in 2 yrs the shit-bo.. i mean x-box will be forgotten and i know x-box 2 won't sell very well. I've already visited the future and i watched it crumble and microsoft, spending every little cent they had into the x-box but still couldn't maintain it in the market.
Yay x-box DIE DIE DIE! :lol:
:helpsmile:
watch me get flamed
Quote:
I've already visited the future and i watched it crumble and microsoft, spending every little cent they had into the x-box but still couldn't maintain it in the market.
:) if your not right im going to slap you
THREAD RESSURECTION
Upside down video? :blink: , runs fine in BS Player for me. :)
And yes the developer was quoted as saying that UT2004 models use around 15,000 polygons wheras these new hi-res models only use around 10,000 just with huge amounts of bumpmapping and gemotery detaill. This should mean that the models will run well on next-gen hardware, and considering this engine is being put into full use in 2005/2006, all gamers should have one of the new GFX cards by then at low prices. :)
Any more news or screenshots I find, I will post here.
so... your theory is that the Unreal engine is going to put MS out of business? quit smoking the crack. :lol:Quote:
Originally posted by joeyipod@17 April 2004 - 06:40
don't get me wrong i'm sure halo 2 will be good but in 2 yrs the shit-bo.. i mean x-box will be forgotten and i know x-box 2 won't sell very well. I've already visited the future and i watched it crumble and microsoft, spending every little cent they had into the x-box but still couldn't maintain it in the market.
Yay x-box DIE DIE DIE! :lol:
:helpsmile:
watch me get flamed
http://i12.ebayimg.com/03/c/00/c0/42/b5_8.JPG
http://i18.ebayimg.com/03/i/01/b3/bf/96_1_b.JPG
mmm... tittiez... :P
Image Resized
[img]http://www.liandriconflict.com/media/images/uc2_1_01.jpg' width='200' height='120' border='0' alt='click for full size view'>