Is Image Size and Mega Pixel the same thing?
Printable View
Is Image Size and Mega Pixel the same thing?
nope. image size is the size of teh picture, like 640x480, or 1024x768 for example.
mega pixels is the quality of the picture, for example 1mega pixel is low quality, while 5 mega pixels is really good quality.
Know any good sites that have fairly comprehensive guides for digi camera noobs? :)
Quote:
nope. image size is the size of teh picture, like 640x480, or 1024x768 for example.
mega pixels is the quality of the picture, for example 1mega pixel is low quality, while 5 mega pixels is really good quality.
Sweet, I have a 5mp digital camera that im taking with me on my trip im going on. So I could change the image size to 1.2m (1280X960) to save some memory space, and still have the same quality of picture just smaller?
why dont you try it? it will be lwoer quality, see how they look, if they are acceptable to you then yes leave it at 1.2 if u want.Quote:
Originally posted by Triadcool@30 April 2004 - 22:25
Quote:
nope. image size is the size of teh picture, like 640x480, or 1024x768 for example.
mega pixels is the quality of the picture, for example 1mega pixel is low quality, while 5 mega pixels is really good quality.
Sweet, I have a 5mp digital camera that im taking with me on my trip im going on. So I could change the image size to 1.2m (1280X960) to save some memory space, and still have the same quality of picture just smaller?
But I thought size and Mega Pixels were different things? Why would you lose quality? I thought the only thing you would lose was size?Quote:
why dont you try it? it will be lwoer quality, see how they look, if they are acceptable to you then yes leave it at 1.2 if u want.
You'll want to send by e-mail or print at the smaller size I would think. Play around with it . Its the only way to learn. :)
Edit: You'll need some software now! Like Adobe Photoshop or the like to really have fun.
http://filesharingtalk.com/index.php?showtopic=110994
The 5M picture is way better quality than the 1.2M.Quote:
Does your camera have the option of jpeg compression? If so, you could take the picture at 5M pixels then compress it. Although you are bound to lose some image quality, you would lose far less quality that way.
Quote:
The 5M picture is way better quality than the 1.2M.
Does your camera have the option of jpeg compression? If so, you could take the picture at 5M pixels then compress it. Although you are bound to lose some image quality, you would lose far less quality that way
My camera doesnt have an option for jpeg compression. Is there another fast way to compress my pictures into jpeg after I have put them on my computer?
once its saved to the comp, open it with photoshop or some other picture editing program, then go to save as, and choose to save as a jpeg file.Quote:
Originally posted by Triadcool@1 May 2004 - 07:45
Quote:
The 5M picture is way better quality than the 1.2M.
Does your camera have the option of jpeg compression? If so, you could take the picture at 5M pixels then compress it. Although you are bound to lose some image quality, you would lose far less quality that way
My camera doesnt have an option for jpeg compression. Is there another fast way to compress my pictures into jpeg after I have put them on my computer?
btw, the 5mp does look better when you zoom into the picture, but just looking normal view i cant tell the difference so just use 1.2mp to save space and be able to take more pictures on ur trip.
Both pics look great to me..so if you want to save space go with the 1.2
Quote:
once its saved to the comp, open it with photoshop or some other picture editing program, then go to save as, and choose to save as a jpeg file.
Quote:
Both pics look great to me..so if you want to save space go with the 1.2
Ok, thanks guys.
I think this is something which needs to be thought seriously when buying a digicamera
if youre using it for an industrial process, where you need pinpoint accuracy and amazing detail, then go for the best you can
if youre using it for holiday snap-shots, how good is your printer? can you print at quality enough to warrant the extra space? bet not.
in the end, cameras of ~2/3MP are amazing as personal cameras - with a good printer (Epson 900 photo or slightly better) you can get fantastic pictures for the album....the only difference is that you save a few bob on the camera and on the memory cards..HDD space..etc.