Printable View
my dad purchased the norton internet security student edition for me.
but i have a problem when i do live update it says i have all updates already installed and the last update date changes :
http://www.chrisporrino.pwp.blueyond...nvaproblem.GIF
any ideas
thanks in advance
i cant see the image, a warning somes up saying that I need a password to view it. and its an ftp, Fpublic...
try uploading the pic to the forum.
fixed image, any ideas?
are there any firewalls running that may be blocking it from connecting to the server?
nope it was inckluded with the norton internet security which has norton firewall but i doubt that will not let it connect
btw i am running xp
thanks
well just disable it just incase...and since ur running xp, try disabling the built in firewall (which is a pos anyway, so i doubt its blocking anything).Quote:
Originally posted by podgey@2 May 2004 - 19:10
nope it was inckluded with the norton internet security which has norton firewall but i doubt that will not let it connect
btw i am running xp
thanks
done both but still no joy is there a plan b?
I would check symantec knowledge base. I had a problem like that and it involved uninstalling and making sure all files were deleted, I believe.
try this
Norton... kinda sucks. Sorry you didn't know. There are always problems with Norton's software, especially updating it. Live Update can be a real pain in the ass.
You should get an anti-virus that works... and without killing your system.
NOD32 is excellent.
AVG comes in both a great free edition and a pay version.
-- Xero Grid --
thanks for your help people the problem is fixed
how did u solve it?
I fn hate that. Tell us how. Fn n00bs. :angry:
i hate to say this, but writing zeros to the drive helps because it clears any values set by norton. i can reinstall my comp, and norton thinks my subscription ends 1 year from the date i reinstall. (because all markers are erased from my comp) beats me, but it works :)
it does after reformatting - is that what you mean?
yesQuote:
Originally posted by AndrewBarker@4 May 2004 - 09:08
it does after reformatting - is that what you mean?
or uninstalling and trashing all the reg keys too :)
you bought a symantec product :frusty: :frusty: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally posted by podgey@2 May 2004 - 15:59
my dad purchased the norton internet security student edition for me.
but i have a problem when i do live update it says i have all updates already installed and the last update date changes :
http://www.chrisporrino.pwp.blueyond...nvaproblem.GIF
any ideas
thanks in advance
well just disable it just incase...and since ur running xp, try disabling the built in firewall (which is a pos anyway, so i doubt its blocking anything). [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by ROSSCO_2004+3 May 2004 - 00:26--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (ROSSCO_2004 @ 3 May 2004 - 00:26)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-podgey@2 May 2004 - 19:10
nope it was inckluded with the norton internet security which has norton firewall but i doubt that will not let it connect
btw i am running xp
thanks
Crap
My NAV and SAV have worked flawlessly since installed on my computer and I haven't been out to a computer experiencing trouble with either, either.Quote:
Originally posted by Xero Grid@3 May 2004 - 02:41
You should get an anti-virus that works... and without killing your system.
AVG comes in both a great free edition and a pay version.
AVG is a program I have seen problems with on two systems. One wans't my domain, the other now has NAV2003.
same here :)Quote:
Originally posted by Chewie UK@5 May 2004 - 21:59
My NAV and SAV have worked flawlessly since installed on my computer
NIS and NAV are good products. Bloated beyond hell, but they do the job and then some for the average joe/jane sausage-head PC-user. Systems with less than 512mb ram will definitely feel the crunch resource-wise.
I have found that symantec client-based corporate editions of their firewall and anti-virus softwares offer all the same protections and securities at half the resource cost.
Hell- compare how fast your system starts up using Norton products versus Symantec corporate products...
izzy will never go back. B)
Just checked Task Manager and added up the RAM occupied by Symantec AV v7 (got TPF Pro firewall now)... 36,452KB.Quote:
Originally posted by Izagaia@8 May 2004 - 21:48
I have found that symantec client-based corporate editions of their firewall and anti-virus softwares offer all the same protections and securities at half the resource cost.
Hell- compare how fast your system starts up using Norton products versus Symantec corporate products...
izzy will never go back. B)
That's not really a small footprint for an anti-virus.
I haven't noticed a difference between NAV and SAV as far as computer performance goes. That could be because I've got 512MB RAM, but I'd have thought they'd both be paged to disk anyway because I just leave 'em be.
Just checked Task Manager and added up the RAM occupied by Symantec AV v7 (got TPF Pro firewall now)... 36,452KB.Quote:
Originally posted by Chewie UK+8 May 2004 - 17:32--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Chewie UK @ 8 May 2004 - 17:32)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Izagaia@8 May 2004 - 21:48
I have found that symantec client-based corporate editions of their firewall and anti-virus softwares offer all the same protections and securities at half the resource cost.
Hell- compare how fast your system starts up using Norton products versus Symantec corporate products...
izzy will never go back. B)
That's not really a small footprint for an anti-virus.
I haven't noticed a difference between NAV and SAV as far as computer performance goes. That could be because I've got 512MB RAM, but I'd have thought they'd both be paged to disk anyway because I just leave 'em be. [/b][/quote]
I was generalizing, perhaps exaggerating alittle, I am afraid. But the basis of my arguement, I believe, still holds truth. I had read somewhere that NIS 2004 uses alittle less than 100meg while SCS runs at roughly 60meg.
I have no clue, in hell, as to the total resources consumed by both products. Nor would I have any notion of knowing which processes to total up to even begin guessing.
This is what I am currently using. A package which I think to be similar to NIS products in terms of performance and contents. Though I do understand on a much broader, uniquely different scale.
http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.com/pro...uctID=154&EID=0
All I can testify is that my system, running XP Pro on a [email protected] with 256mg ram, loads more than twice as fast at start up (over five minutes for all processes to load with NIS in place and only a minute and a half when using SCS) when say compared to when I was using NIS2003&2004 Pro. Internet pages load (1.5Mbps dsl on IE browser) instantaneously. Full system anti-virus scans (@150,000 files on a 40gig HD) perform in less than an hour (avg 40 min) compared to the hour and a half that NAV was notoriously noted for.
If this is indication that the two product lines perform vastly different, then my favorability lies with the Symantec enterprise line hands down.
I have the professional version of NIS 2003, but the Live Update still has an expiration. :|
its the corporate version that live update doesn't expireQuote:
Originally posted by backlash@14 May 2004 - 22:35
I have the professional version of NIS 2003, but the Live Update still has an expiration. :|