Big,fat Michael Moore

is registered to vote in 2 states. LMAO. What a gluttton. But is that really surprising of Democratic voters. After all, it is a time-honored tradition dating back to Kennedy and LBJ. Voter fraud, multiple voting, and dead people voting is commonplace among Democrats. The WallStreet Journal proved how easy it is to make up a fictitious voter and register to vote through the mail. Also, dead people are not taken off the voting rolls for months. Dems control most of the political machines in the big cities thus allowing for these abuses. How else can anyone explain a Democrat winning an election? Who in their right mind would vote to have their taxes increased? They didn't need to cheat in 1992, they had Ross Perot, without whom the Dems would have lost every presidential election since 1976 . :lol:

ha ha a Republican :lol:

I can't type for the pain in my sides laughing :teehee: :teehee: :teehee:



http://homepages.uni-tuebingen.de/st...n/beafraid.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rollwave@28 June 2004 - 22:37
is registered to vote in 2 states. LMAO. What a gluttton. But is that really surprising of Democratic voters. After all, it is a time-honored tradition dating back to Kennedy and LBJ. Voter fraud, multiple voting, and dead people voting is commonplace among Democrats. The WallStreet Journal proved how easy it is to make up a fictitious voter and register to vote through the mail. Also, dead people are not taken off the voting rolls for months. Dems control most of the political machines in the big cities thus allowing for these abuses. How else can anyone explain a Democrat winning an election? Who in their right mind would vote to have their taxes increased? They didn't need to cheat in 1992, they had Ross Perot, without whom the Dems would have lost every presidential election since 1976 . :lol:

---

lmao :lol: wat a dumb person (and a republican at that) <--- coincidence? i think not lol :lol: jp jp, still funny though

What do you expect from a member of the National Rifle Association?

Rollwave,
Sources please.

Quote:

---

Also, dead people are not taken off the voting rolls for months

---

Don&#39;t be disheartened.

Black Democrat voting Floridians are taken off the voting rolls for no good reason.

Yet you reckon "Dems control most of the political machines"? Even though Jeb Bush is the governor of Florida? Even though the chairwoman of Bush&#39;s campaign was in charge of the vote count?

A veritable paradox indeed...

This isn’t my thread but the post did state The Wall Street Journal was the source.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BigBank_Hank
This isn’t my thread but the post did state The Wall Street Journal was the source.

---

The post stated that The Wall Street Journal "proved how easy it is to make up a fictitious voter and register to vote through the mail".

It doesnt say that The Wall Street Journal is the source of the "Moore is registered to vote in 2 states" story.

Has he moved house recently?

If he has, he will be registered to vote in 2 places...like everyone else that moves house is...until the register of voters is updated.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Skweeky@29 June 2004 - 19:49
Has he moved house recently?

If he has, he will be registered to vote in 2 places...like everyone else that moves house is...until the register of voters is updated.

---

Last time he voted in New York was 2001.

He registered in Michigan in April, and co-incidentally his Driving License has been changed to Michigan around the same time....he&#39;s never voted there.

He spends equal time between New York and Michigan....however Michigan is a "Swing" State (13th I think?) and New York is a safe Democrat State.

If its anything like UK, the "Register of Voters" only gets updated once a year...or before an election, so if you cancel your registration it could sit there for months before the Register is updated.... I dont know the US (or NY State) system.

To me, it looks like he&#39;s making Michigan his "main residence"....not surprising, he really wants Bush out and his vote means more there, plus thats where he comes from.



If i got the State politics wrong, im sure i&#39;ll be corrected ;)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rollwave@29 June 2004 - 06:37
is registered to vote in 2 states. LMAO. What a gluttton. But is that really surprising of Democratic voters. After all, it is a time-honored tradition dating back to Kennedy and LBJ. Voter fraud, multiple voting, and dead people voting is commonplace among Democrats. The WallStreet Journal proved how easy it is to make up a fictitious voter and register to vote through the mail. Also, dead people are not taken off the voting rolls for months. Dems control most of the political machines in the big cities thus allowing for these abuses. How else can anyone explain a Democrat winning an election? Who in their right mind would vote to have their taxes increased? They didn&#39;t need to cheat in 1992, they had Ross Perot, without whom the Dems would have lost every presidential election since 1976 . :lol:

---

:o

That will explain the enormous turnout for elections......





:blink:




No wait a minute ... it will explain why there is any turnout at all. It just the same half dozen people voting all day. :lol:

going off topic a bit but i got some junk mail this morning, titled "micheal moor assinated"....opened to find an advert for herbal sex aids... :D

whatever people think of him or his films, just goes to show how well known he is if spammers feel that people will open email with his name on it

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Biggles@29 June 2004 - 14:02

No wait a minute ... it will explain why there is any turnout at all. It just the same half dozen people voting all day. :lol:

---

Righto.
Say what you will, you must grant this...those damn Democrats are energetic.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by hungrylilboy@29 June 2004 - 14:02
going off topic a bit but i got some junk mail this morning, titled "micheal moor assinated"....opened to find an advert for herbal sex aids... :D

whatever people think of him or his films, just goes to show how well known he is if spammers feel that people will open email with his name on it

---

You open junk mail??????????? :eek: :nono:

The way I heard it was that while he takes pains to claim his "independent" status as a voter (he says he&#39;s not a Democrat), he is a registered Democrat in both states.

Apparently facts, in Mr. Moore&#39;s capable hands, are maleable things, indeed. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by j2k4@29 June 2004 - 19:03


Apparently facts, in Mr. Moore&#39;s capable hands, are maleable things, indeed. ;)

---

As "facts" in yours are increasingly nebulous.
From whom did this damaging bit of evidence originate?

This isn&#39;t yet another Al Franken rip-off is it?

Quote:

---

Originally posted by clocker+29 June 2004 - 21:47--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (clocker &#064; 29 June 2004 - 21:47)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin-j2k4@29 June 2004 - 19:03


Apparently facts, in Mr. Moore&#39;s capable hands, are maleable things, indeed. ;)

---

As "facts" in yours are increasingly nebulous.
From whom did this damaging bit of evidence originate?

This isn&#39;t yet another Al Franken rip-off is it?[/b][/quote]
No way-

It was recounted by the award-winning and unassailable ace of FOXNEWS, Mr. Brit Hume. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by j2k4@29 June 2004 - 20:05
the award-winning and unassailable ace of FOXNEWS, Mr. Brit Hume. ;)

---

Isn&#39;t that an anagram for Al Franken?






Damn...this quest for my wayward fifth star is wearing me out&#33;

:P

Having just finished "Stupid White Men", where he has some choice words against the Democrats and Clinton/Gore in particular....(he appears to think Nadar is the only Candidate that actually would do what he claimed...)

I suspect that Mr Moore wouldnt actually vote Democrat unless it was a Swing State...and this merely to keep the greater of 2 evils out of office.

His Michigan registration doesnt have anything as to his politics BTW... The Smoking Gun has copies of both registrations (The New York One was in 1992, The Michigan one April past)



j2k4,

You&#39;d be proud of the slagging off he gave Clinton/Gore ;)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Rat Faced@30 June 2004 - 13:48
j2k4,

You&#39;d be proud of the slagging off he gave Clinton/Gore ;)

---

...which no doubt required the totality of whatever redemptive qualities Mr. Moore possesses. ;)

HE Defended Bush on some things...

Not because he agreed with what had been done, but because Bush was merely continuing Clintons policies in these areas, and was getting the Blame unfairly...



I think he&#39;s a little bit of an anarchist, our Mr Moore.... definatly not a Democrat, way too far to the Left for that.

I feel he may be happier in Europe than the USA

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Rat Faced@30 June 2004 - 16:00


I feel he may be happier in Europe than the USA

---

I expect you are correct, however, the money is in the U.S.; also, I believe Moore is addicted to the dissenters here, and there would necessarily be less of that in Europe, at least to start.

Actually, I think Europeans would tire of him in relatively short order. ;)

I caught a snippet on the radio which seemed to be suggesting that his movie is doing well. He may be more than happy in the US - especially if he feels his message is going over well.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Biggles@30 June 2004 - 17:08
I caught a snippet on the radio which seemed to be suggesting that his movie is doing well. He may be more than happy in the US - especially if he feels his message is going over well.

---

His movie is doing very well, and critiques of same are also garnering interest, so I guess the great public debate is, after a fashion, underway.

He personally is aided by a not-so-extraordinary talent for finding himself amongst those who are normally disposed to agree with his views, and avoiding dissenters.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by j2k4@30 June 2004 - 19:03


He personally is aided by a not-so-extraordinary talent for finding himself amongst those who are normally disposed to agree with his views, and avoiding dissenters.

---

Much like Dick Cheney.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by clocker+30 June 2004 - 21:06--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (clocker @ 30 June 2004 - 21:06)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-j2k4@30 June 2004 - 19:03


He personally is aided by a not-so-extraordinary talent for finding himself amongst those who are normally disposed to agree with his views, and avoiding dissenters.

---

Much like Dick Cheney. [/b][/quote]
Just so-

Debate is a tremendously wearing endeavor, is it not?

Poor Richard has a tired ticker, too. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by j2k4+1 July 2004 - 03:03--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (j2k4 @ 1 July 2004 - 03:03)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>

Quote:

---

Originally posted by clocker@30 June 2004 - 21:06
<!--QuoteBegin-j2k4

---

Quote:

---

@30 June 2004 - 19:03


He personally is aided by a not-so-extraordinary talent for finding himself amongst those who are normally disposed to agree with his views, and avoiding dissenters.

---

Much like Dick Cheney.

---

Just so-

Debate is a tremendously wearing endeavor, is it not?

Poor Richard has a tired ticker, too. ;) [/b][/quote]
Which is somewhat worrisome given that he would appear to be running mate for the second term. Whilst he may be a tad tricky he is at least cognisant of what is going on. :helpsmile:

As an aside, I heard today some speculation that Bill Clinton (as the de facto head of the Democratic Party) is preparing to put the kibosh on John Kerry&#39;s emerging prospect veep, John Edwards (I have forecast Edwards as Kerry&#39;s choice, and also what follows, as the only possible exception), offering instead Hillary as Kerry&#39;s partner; Clinton believes (correctly, in my mind) that Edwards&#39; candidacy would forestall Hillary&#39;s chances in &#39;08, and perhaps beyond.

So-

The Dems are left with a BIG decision: Who&#39;s gonna run the show?

The candidate, or the ex-pres?

Herewith, another prognostication:

Kerry goes with Edwards, Kerry loses.

Kerry goes with Hillary, and loses big.

And just think-it&#39;s all up to ole&#39; Bill&#33;

Now, that&#39;s some funny shit.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

EDIT: Almost forgot:

Part of the same discussion was this little tid-bit:

Cheney steps aside for Condi Rice as Veep.

God, would I love that-Condi debating Hillary?

Condi would destroy her, and that is no lie.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by j2k4@1 July 2004 - 13:47
As an aside, I heard today some speculation that Bill Clinton (as the de facto head of the Democratic Party) is preparing to put the kibosh on John Kerry&#39;s emerging prospect veep, John Edwards (I have forecast Edwards as Kerry&#39;s choice, and also what follows, as the only possible exception), offering instead Hillary as Kerry&#39;s partner; Clinton believes (correctly, in my mind) that Edwards&#39; candidacy would forestall Hillary&#39;s chances in &#39;08, and perhaps beyond.

So-

The Dems are left with a BIG decision: Who&#39;s gonna run the show?

The candidate, or the ex-pres?

Herewith, another prognostication:

Kerry goes with Edwards, Kerry loses.

Kerry goes with Hillary, and loses big.

And just think-it&#39;s all up to ole&#39; Bill&#33;

Now, that&#39;s some funny shit.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

---

Who cares who Kerry runs with....... We&#39;re more concerned who cheney runs with :lol: :lol:

Saw a cartoon on CNN but couldn&#39;t find it on the web

Quote:

---

Originally posted by vidcc@1 July 2004 - 23:00
Who cares who Kerry runs with....... We&#39;re more concerned who cheney runs with :lol: :lol:

---

Ronald McDonald, perhaps? ;)

What?

No reaction?

No refutation?

No speculation?

What&#39;s wrong with you people?

Don&#39;t Liberals "throw the bones" on occasion? :huh:

Just watched this film, hmmm that really can&#39;t be good for your country&#39;s moral :(

Quote:

---

Originally posted by danb@3 July 2004 - 17:23
Just watched this film, hmmm that really can&#39;t be good for your country&#39;s moral :(

---

Such things can have unintended consequences; I&#39;ve talked to more people who have seen it and are pissed off at it than pissed off by it.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by j2k4+3 July 2004 - 19:47--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (j2k4 @ 3 July 2004 - 19:47)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-danb@3 July 2004 - 17:23
Just watched this film, hmmm that really can&#39;t be good for your country&#39;s moral&nbsp; :(

---

Such things can have unintended consequences; I&#39;ve talked to more people who have seen it and are pissed off at it than pissed off by it. [/b][/quote]
Really?

I suppose where you are and who you talk to makes a big difference.

In my neighborhood ( where I am by far the youngest), reaction to the movie is overwhelmingly positive...maybe 10 to 1 really.
I was surprised at the number of folks who had seen it and expect that it will be a widely discussed topic at tomorrow&#39;s neighborhood party.

I&#39;m not sure if this is germaine, but recent polling here shows that Bush has lost a 10 point lead and now trails Kerry by 4 points.
Both candidates just made a swing through the state.

I can only assume that Nader is so far ahead of them both that they don&#39;t bother reporting his percentages.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by clocker@4 July 2004 - 01:24
In my neighborhood ( where I am by far the youngest), reaction to the movie is overwhelmingly positive...maybe 10 to 1 really.

---

Wow, this topic must be just slighty behind:

I pooped this week

and

Erection? Oh, do you mean building something?

Quote:

---

Originally posted by clocker@3 July 2004 - 22:24

I suppose where you are and who you talk to makes a big difference.

I can only assume that Nader is so far ahead of them both that they don&#39;t bother reporting his percentages.

---

I gathered these opinions using the same technique Mr. Moore uses to collect positive feedback:

Knowing where to hangout. ;)

Will Nader be on the ballot in Colorado? :huh:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by j2k4@3 July 2004 - 20:29

I gathered these opinions using the same technique Mr. Moore uses to collect positive feedback:

Knowing where to hangout. ;)

---

Ya know, it really surprises me how popular Bush is amongst prison inmates.

When you get out, you might be surprised what us "outsiders" think of the movie.

Hope your parole isn&#39;t too onerous....the job market is for shit.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by clocker+4 July 2004 - 01:40--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (clocker &#064; 4 July 2004 - 01:40)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-j2k4@3 July 2004 - 20:29

I gathered these opinions using the same technique Mr. Moore uses to collect positive feedback:

Knowing where to hangout. ;)

---

Ya know, it really surprises me how popular Bush is amongst prison inmates.

When you get out, you might be surprised what us "outsiders" think of the movie.

Hope your parole isn&#39;t too onerous....the job market is for shit. [/b][/quote]
Bush, the death penalty advocate, is popular at prisons?

Interesting.

So those who may die because his of policies are strong supporters. He must very good then.

BTW, where is me coat?

Quote:

---

Originally posted by j2k4@3 July 2004 - 22:29

Will Nader be on the ballot in Colorado? :huh:

---

This was a serious question, not a dig; I really have no idea.