Printable View
Should it be banned?
Millions of fish have their faces ripped in half simply for the hunt.
There is a plan to stop this but at present you must obtain a liscence and pay "Swim Fee's"
This is a big big money business too.
Yet it's still cruel.
Agree/Dissagree?
Jonno :cool:
Its spelt coarse :P
I don't think it should be banned though
Yeah yeah whatever.
I made this so JP will stop spamming my foxy thread with fish :lol:
It should be banned or the law lifted so we can eat Carp etc.
Jonno :cool:
You aren't allowed to kill freshwater fish
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
The fisherman, if you get caught killing anything you have caught by the baliffs of that fishery or by a NRA official you are in trouble.
Besides you throw them back so they can be caught again, if you catch your 20lb carp you put it back so that next time you catch it it could be 30lb
:lol:What sort of fecked up answer/question is that? :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
@Dan ..... Yes that is true, and if it were banned the numbers of fish would decline due to no one bothering to stock the lakes/ponds etc.
It is actually governed more closely now so that minimum cruelty is caused :)
In an ideal world it should be banned tho :)
Jonno :cool:
Yes, but that would be compulsary at that Venue, there will be a request sign to say "Pike must be destroyed" .Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley
Altho they may have changed the laws on that :)
Jonno :cool:
And how many hounds are drowned in this pursuit? :angry:Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon L. Obscene
At lot of lakes are specially stocked purely for the purpose of fishing.
I've been known to angle, not for a few years tho'
In t'other thread JP asked if it was different to fox hunting because a fox is a mammal. I believe it is. Fish run on instinct, there is little or no cognitive thought, in fact fish are partially controled by their lateral lines - bypassing their ickle brain for most motor functions. They've really not much idea of what's going on. Comparing a gudgeon to a fox is quite unrealistic.
That doesn't mean that we should torture them but it does make the argument for bannage a little different to the fox hunting one. I think using a barbless hook and the right type of nets makes the concept a little more palatable, at least.
I'm not sure if anyone will argue that a fish has just as much right to live as a fox or whatever but there is a clear distinction as far as I'm concerned. I've no qualms about swatting an irksome fly or exhaling and killing a million bacteria, it is all relative.
Fishing provides a great many people with a means of relaxing and enjoyment, to curtail that for the sake of what a fish will forget a few seconds later doesn't make sense, to me.
I already said that :01:Quote:
Originally Posted by DanB
WooHoo , people who agree with me in TWO!! threads :01:
@JP ..... Yeah, erm good debating techniques, thats how I used to do it :P
Jonno :cool:
No I dissagree with that.
While at the same time I agree whole heartedly and would like to congratulate you on fine points of view while spouting complete shite at the same time :01:
Jonno :cool:
You're most welcome in your current nippled state I should expect plenty more on this November eve :01:
Jonno :cool: